trump
For Trump's Fans, foes, frenemies and Twitter followers.
Understanding Trickle-Down Economics: A Critical Perspective
The Promise of Prosperity There is something interesting about the way economic policies are presented to the public. Governments frequently promise that particular reforms will create prosperity, encourage investment and eventually improve the living standards of society. Yet behind these familiar promises lie questions that are rarely examined with the same enthusiasm. Who is expected to benefit first? Who must wait for the benefits to arrive? And what happens when an economy grows without producing a comparable improvement in the lives of those whose labour sustains it?
By Sergios Saropoulosabout 8 hours ago in The Swamp
Election Cycle 2026
Election cycle in full swing! Millions of American rush to the polls to make their voice heard in a quintessential election year. The mud slinging from various political parties entangles Americans, bringing up various questions. What has happened so far?
By Iris Harris4 days ago in The Swamp
The Missing Argument in the Stay-at-Home Parent Subsidy Debate
Preface: Video Context: Video Credit: Timcast / Tim Pool This article is a response to a recent Timcast segment discussing the proposed policy that would allow qualifying married couples with a stay-at-home parent to receive childcare subsidies of roughly $9,000 per child per year. The video frames the central debate around whether this amounts to additional welfare or whether it simply redirects money government is already spending on childcare toward parents who choose to provide that care themselves. Around 9:32–10:20 , Tim argues that the welfare expenditure already exists and that the important change is where the incentive points: instead of subsidizing families specifically when parents work and children are cared for elsewhere, the same funding could begin supporting married parents who raise their children at home.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast2 months ago in The Swamp
A Better Buyout: Paying Married Parents to Buy Back Their Time
A Different Kind of Buyout I previously proposed what I called a Family Support Buyout: give families the option to voluntarily exchange a large portion of the government benefits and services already being spent on their behalf for one predictable, untaxed monthly payment they control themselves. Instead of administering SNAP, childcare subsidies, housing assistance, refundable credits, cash assistance, and other ordinary supports through separate bureaucracies, government could calculate the avoidable cost of those programs and offer families perhaps 65, 70, or 75 percent of that value directly. The family would relinquish the benefits being replaced, taxpayers would retain the remaining savings, and the household would gain dramatically greater control over how its resources are allocated. Medical coverage, disability services, catastrophic healthcare, and other specialized needs could remain separate because those costs are less suitable for a simple cash conversion. The central idea was straightforward: if government is already spending $100 supporting a family, perhaps both taxpayers and the family can benefit if the family receives $70 directly instead.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast2 months ago in The Swamp
