Humans logo

The Study demonstrates that the way lonely people receive information and see the environment differs.

When compared to their nonlonely contemporaries, the researchers discovered substantial differences between how the brains of lonely people function and process information.

By Francis DamiPublished 10 months ago 3 min read
Like

The Study demonstrates that the way lonely people receive information and see the environment differs.

According to a study from the United States that was published in the journal Psychological Science, lonely people don't quite perceive the environment the same way as those who aren't lonely.

It was further said that while those who are not lonely absorb information similarly, those who are lonely each perceive the world in their own unique way.

How was the study carried out?

66 first-year college students between the ages of 18 and 21 participated in the University of California study's neuroimaging examinations. Additionally, the UCLA Loneliness Scale, a self-report questionnaire to gauge emotions of social isolation and loneliness, was given to the students.

Based on the findings, two categories of young adults were created: those who experience loneliness and those who do not: "nonlonely." Then, while using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity, 14 video clips were played to the class.

It was claimed that the subject matter was interesting enough to prevent participants' thoughts from straying throughout the assignment from affecting the information gathered. The videos covered a variety of subjects, including wistful music videos, party scenes, and sporting events, offering a variety of situations for examination.

The University of Southern California assistant professor of psychology Elisa Baek and her group examined 214 distinct brain areas to see how they changed over time in response to the stimuli in the films.

Additionally, they analyzed each brain region's activity in various people to determine how similar or dissimilar their reactions were.

What did the research reveal?

When compared to their nonlonely friends, the researchers discovered that lonely people's brains function and process information very differently. The researchers also observed that there were substantial variances among individual loners in addition to differences between the two groups.

The researchers looked for correlations between brain reactions to naturalistic stimuli and loneliness as well as whether these neural responses adhere to what they called the "Anna Karenina principle." The first phase of the novel Anna Karenina by Russian author and philosopher Leo Tolstoy served as its inspiration. "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own unique way."

"It was surprising to find that lonely people were even less similar to each other," said Baek. in a declaration. The "Anna Karenina principle" is a good description of lonely people, she continued because their unique experiences of loneliness are not universally relatable.

According to the study, persons with high levels of loneliness, regardless of how many friends they had, were more likely to have distinctive brain responses than individuals who were not lonely.

Despite our everyday connections with other people, the researchers emphasized that being surrounded by people who have different perspectives on the world may also be a risk factor for loneliness.

People are social creatures at heart, and strong social ties can contribute to their longevity and well-being. The healthcare system is a crucial, but underutilized, partner in diagnosing loneliness and preventing illnesses linked to it.

Almost all persons 50 and older have some kind of interaction with the healthcare system. A doctor's checkup or a visit from a home health nurse may be one of the few face-to-face interactions someone without social connections has. Clinicians have a rare chance to spot patients who are at risk for social isolation or loneliness.

Clinicians are advised by NASEM to routinely examine patients who may be at risk and refer them to community options for assistance. NASEM advises applying the Berkman-Syme Social Network Index in therapeutic settings.

the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale (for gauging loneliness) and the social isolation scale (for gauging social isolation).

Patients, however, must use their own judgment. Some folks could enjoy their solitude. Also crucial to keep in mind is the fact that loneliness and social isolation are two separate but unrelated characteristics of social connections. Both of these pose health risks.

singlesciencereviewinterviewhumanityfriendshipfamilyfact or fictionadviceinterviewhistoryfact or fictioncareerbook review
Like

About the Creator

Francis Dami

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.