Psyche logo

Learned Helplessness and Learned Optimism

Feel defeated before you even begin to fight? It might be learned behavior.

By Donna L. Roberts, PhD (Psych Pstuff)Published about a year ago 3 min read
Photo by Jeremy Perkins on Unsplash

Learned helplessness is a phenomenon in which an individual experiences a sense of powerlessness in situations where they have previously been exposed to uncontrollable, negative events. Discovered quite serendipitously, it has since been credited by some scholars as the impetus that resulted in cognitive psychology’s displacement of behaviorism. This phenomenon has since been observed in a wide range of species, including humans, and has been the subject of extensive research in the fields of psychology and neuroscience.

Through a series of experiments, researchers Maier and Seligman (1976) demonstrated that animals can learn that their behavior will have no effect on an environmental event or condition and thus conclude that an aversive stimulus cannot be escaped or avoided. The learned helplessness studies illustrated clearly that thought processes, and not merely the observable rewards or punishments, were determinants of behavior.

In the original experiments, dogs were subjected to conditions where electric shocks could not be avoided regardless of their behavior. Subsequently, when conditions changed such that the shocks could be avoided the dogs did not adjust their behavior, but rather continued to act based on what they had previously learned — that they were helpless and could not escape the aversive stimuli (Maier and Seligman, 1976). These early experiments were theorized to have profound implications for human behavior, particularly with regard to motivation and the development and perpetuation of depression.

Like with the dogs, human beings typically manifest a passive acceptance of what they perceive as uncontrollable aversive conditions. Repeated exposure to failure experiences results in depression, a lack of motivation and a loss of hope. The expectation of failure is learned and generalized so that new experiences are approached with a low level of perceived self-efficacy.

Seligman and his colleagues identified general defining aspects of learned helplessness to include: a subsequent failure to learn to avoid an undesirable, but escapable stimulus after repeated exposure to the stimulus in inescapable circumstances; cognitive and motivational deficits exhibited by a subject repeatedly exposed to inescapable negative stimuli; and the generalized broad expectation that outcomes were independent of effort and thus uncontrollable (Buchwald, Coyne & Cole, 1978).

Furthermore, they categorized the major symptoms of learned helplessness into three specific groups — motivational, cognitive, and emotional — each reflecting a different aspect of the individual’s holistic response to this form of conditioning. The motivational aspect refers to a reduced incentive to try new coping responses. The cognitive aspect manifests in the inability to learn new responses to overcome the prior learning that the aversive situation is uncontrollable and in escapable. The emotional aspect refers to the withdrawing, apathetic tendencies and the subjective feelings of anxiety, fear and hopelessness (Alloy & Abramson, 1982; Ormrod, 2004). Taken together, these symptoms represent the pervasive sense of desperation and lack of control that perpetuates depression.

By Dev Asangbam on Unsplash

While Seligman argued that depression is a form of learned helplessness based on an expectation that one cannot control important outcomes in life, he has also written about learned optimism (1990). He argues that optimism and pessimism are rooted in our “explanatory styles” — in the ways we explain good and bad events. Based on large numbers of studies, Seligman described the typical pessimist as someone who attributes failure to factors that are internal, permanent, and global, and conversely, success to factors that are external, temporary, and specific. This explanatory style breeds despair and low self-esteem. In contrast, the typical optimist is someone who makes the opposite attributions.


Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1982). Learned helplessness, depression, and the illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42(6), 1114–1126.

Buchwald, A.M., Coyne, J.C., and Cole, C.S. (1978). A critical evaluation of the learned helplessness model of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 180–193.

Maier, S. F. & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46.

Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Seligman, M. (1998). Learned Optimism. New York, NY: Pocket Books.


About the Creator

Donna L. Roberts, PhD (Psych Pstuff)

Writer, psychologist and university professor researching media psych, generational studies, human and animal rights, and industrial/organizational psychology

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.