Filthy logo

Our Relationship with Russell Brand

a filthy man

By Scott ChristensonPublished 9 months ago Updated 9 months ago 3 min read
11
Russell Brand in 2014. (Credit: Wikipedia)

A filthy man. But, we all knew that, didn't we?

In the 2000s, he was our loveable rascal. With his heavy Essex accent, and flamboyant mannerisms and loquacious style of speaking, he was an interesting contradiction. An acceptable and articulate connection to the working class. He was a guest on countless British variety shows of the 2000s and hobnobbed with all the major TV celebrities of the time.

From watching the news this week, it appears a LOT of people had relationships with Russell Brand back in the 2000s. Countless people in the entertainment industry have come out to raise their hands and share their stories. These people benefited from their position adjunct to his celebrity in the past, and now, many are benefiting with a few minutes of media exposure by taking part in the whirlwind of his rapid downfall.

Four women who had relationships with, and very bad experiences of, Russell Brand, including one who was just 16, told their stories anonymously to investigative reporters at The Sunday Times, The Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches.

The head of The Times investigation team, Paul Morgan-Bentley, covers the allegations concisely in an 18-minute audio interview with Niall Paterson at Sky News:

There's a good chance you know the allegations already. Within days, this has become, as so many things these days, an us-versus-them debate. Before I get to that, I want to cover:

Two Unbelievable Facts

  1. Russell Brand had a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old child, and used BBC paid cars to transport her from school to his apartment. People in his management company knew of this relationship and cautioned him to keep it secret.
  2. In the UK Legal System, it is legal for an adult to carry on a consensual sexual relationship with a 16-year-old. Outrageous, isn't it?! Someone update that law, please.

My own relationship with Russell Brand is based solely on watching his appearances on British TV variety shows in the 2000s. Entertaining at times, yes, but with his outrageous sexual aggressiveness, I thought to myself, there is the type of man I would never want my daughters to meet.

I feel UK celebrity culture is more 'laddish' than America. Boys will be boys is a more accepted concept there. A few years later, I watched Russell Brand make the move to Hollywood to appear in Forgetting Sarah Marshall. His persona didn't really fit the film. Even back then, I didn't see Hollywood working out for him. I join the vast crowd of people who are sharing the doubts they had about Russell Brand back in the 2000s, but didn't bother to talk about it at the time.

Synopsis of the Left/Right media spin:

Liberal Media: Judging from the weight of the testimony and the thoroughness of The Times investigation, Russell Brand is undeniably guilty of sexual abuse. His conduct is indefensible, and for the justice of women, he must be punished. To all doubter of the authenticity of the allegations, we would like to stress that it was the media, and not the justice system, that stopped Harvey Weinstein.

Conservative Media: Everyone knew Russell was sexually aggressive (he had said so himself in countless interviews and standup jokes), so why have these victims stepped forward now, 15 years later, after Russell has become a right-wing commentator on YouTube? And what about (insert any number of celebrities) whose behavior is known to be as equally horrid that have escaped the media spotlight.

Can both sides of the political aisle, be correct at the same time? In this case, very likely yes. Let's take Russell down. And then find another half dozen celebrities enabled by the system, who were as equally bad (I'm sure they are easy to find). And put them on the same leaky rowboat headed toward a prison cell.

You are probably feeling outraged about something I wrote. That's perfectly normal. Have a coffee break and take your dog for a walk before leaving your thoughts in the comment section.

**

A Wild Academic Tangent

For a deep dive into why we can feel so angry about opinions that we read on social media, Max Fisher, New York Times journalist and author of 'The Chaos Machine', explains an interesting theory about it through a long meandering tale about a Siberian lady who raised domesticated foxes in the 1950s:

relationships
11

About the Creator

Scott Christenson

Born and raised in Milwaukee WI, living in Hong Kong. Hoping to share some of my experiences w short story & non-fiction writing. Have a few shortlisted on Reedsy:

https://blog.reedsy.com/creative-writing-prompts/author/scott-christenson/

Reader insights

Outstanding

Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!

Top insight

  1. Heartfelt and relatable

    The story invoked strong personal emotions

Add your insights

Comments (8)

Sign in to comment
  • Denise Larkin6 months ago

    It is sickening that this can happen. What a shock that he saw a 16-year-old.

  • Carol Townend9 months ago

    I wish that the U.K. would change the legal age of sexual content to 18 too. However, after going through similar stuff myself, I don't think changing the legal age will be enough.

  • Hannah Moore9 months ago

    At no point in the last three decades would I have left another woman alone in a room with this man without privately and explicitly checking they were wanting to sleep with him before I left. Not that that is remotely relevant to my life. I loved the reminder to go walk the dog before commenting.

  • I only knew about Russell Brand being with Katy Perry. I had NO idea about all these! So shocking!

  • Test9 months ago

    It's interesting because I read his "Booky Wook" when it came out and all I could think when the "Me too" movement was big was when is Russel Brand going to be named. He admitted to a lot of sketchy stuff in his autobiography. I hadn't realized he became a right wing commentator.

  • Let me first state I have absolutely zero relationship to Russell Brand. For the most part I agree with what you said. Although I do not feel that both sides (liberal/conservative) have equally compelling arguments. From what I've seen liberals will hold their own accountable if the are found to be guilty of wrongdoing. While conservatives will completely ignore the wrongdoings of their own and even lie about it - calling legitimate investigations a witch hunt.

  • The trouble with gossip of others… is that e we can never answer the questions you pose (Eg. Why did they wait 15 years). I could give you 100 potential answers to this as fast as I could speak them… and neither of us would know if any of them are right…. Which makes these kinds of discussions…… ultimately….. pointless…. The point you raise about the law and consensual sex with 16 year old children…. THAT is worthy of conversation and I wholeheartedly agree that is in every way wrong. Children need to be protected. I’m sure you are aware of the Jimmy Saville case and just how covered up paedophilia is in Uk high circles, it would take a lot of public pressure to even attempt to change that law - and too many unconscious people will oppose it (hence the discussion IS important) Russell was a heroin addict. That alone tells us many, many things about how deeply traumatised he was (and evidently still is). Judging that… is not our business. Protecting children and speaking generally re laws etc… is 👌🕊️🤍🤍

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.