Criminal logo

What is the Real Story Behind Osama Bin Laden and Nuclear Weapons?

Osama bin Laden was once a significant danger to the United States, ranking first on the most wanted list, dead or alive. Get a take on this bizarre narrative, which delves into the dispute surrounding bin Laden and the alleged nuclear weapons he possessed! ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

By InfoPublished about a year ago โ€ข 4 min read
Osama Bin Laden: NYC ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Osama bin Laden was once a significant danger to the United States, ranking first on the most wanted list, dead or alive. Get a take on this bizarre narrative, which delves into the dispute surrounding bin Laden and the alleged nuclear weapons he possessed! ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Osama Bin Laden was renowned for employing unconventional methods of attack against his targets, but did he ever obtain the ultimate weapon? Following the 9/11 attacks, many people feared that the next shoe would arrive in the shape of a mushroom cloud. Al Qaeda was never going to have the resources to build a nuclear bomb, but how would they get their hands on one? And did he actually have one in storage, waiting for the right time? Only nine nationsโ€”most of them powerful and affluent countriesโ€”have ever accomplished this successfully. Allies in their programs provided assistance to those who aren't. Even in the countries where they were hosted, Al Qaeda was frequently treated as an unwanted guest, with Pakistan, Sudan, and Afghanistan rarely providing Bin Laden with any official support. Al Qaeda never had any significant financial backers.

Would any of the nuclear-armed states take the chance of assisting Osama Bin Laden in obtaining one? The majority of the contenders are obviously outright no. The enemies of Al Qaeda included the United States, France, Great Britain, India, and Israel. Russia, despite its tense relationship with the United States, was unlikely to be of assistance either; after all, it struggles with Muslim extremists in the Chechnya region and has frequently been the target of terrorist attacks. In a similar vein, China may be a geopolitical rival of the United States, but they seek to establish themselves as the dominant power in a stable world, which nuclear-armed terrorists undoubtedly do not contribute to. Two wild cards are now left.

The world's newest nuclear power, North Korea, often appears to be the most unstable. The country's leader, Kim Jong-Un, frequently brags about using his nuclear missiles to attack the west and has shown a willingness to assist the US's adversaries in obtaining their own weapons. But is he willing to work with Al Qaeda? Unlikely, as Al Qaeda is seen as too unpredictable, even for the Kim dynasty, and once the weapon leaves North Korea, it is impossible to predict how it will be used. Additionally, US bombers could fly over North Korea if an Al Qaeda bomb used against the west is found to have originated in that country. Pakistan is now the only option. With Osama Bin Laden eventually being found in his Abbottabad compound in 2011, Pakistan, the second-newest nuclear power, had by far the strongest connection to Al Qaeda.

The Pakistani government's knowledge of Al Qaeda activity in the nation is still under debate, which is probably why the US chose not to involve them in the mission to kill the terrorist leader. But despite this, the government works to keep cordial ties with the US in the hopes that they will restrain India in the Kashmir region. This makes it extremely unlikely that the Pakistani government would give Al Qaeda access to weapons that they could use to attack the US. Yet that does not imply that nobody would. Like any government, that of Pakistan is rife with disagreements. There is undoubtedly a conflict between militants and moderates, even if they don't engage in the same brawls on the floor of parliament as South Korean lawmakers.

Furthermore, the numerous scientists who worked on the nuclear program all had their own goals, and it's possible that one of them had enough sympathy for the terror organization to assist Osama Bin Laden in developing his own bomb. But for a variety of reasons, this might not be likely. For starters, it's difficult to simply hand someone a nuclear bomb. It's not something you can just pass along because the smallest nuclear bomb in the US arsenal weighs about 700 pounds. Delivering it is a different matter once you have it. The bombs are difficult to detonate and useless without a delivery method, and Pakistan lacks any such method that could easily hit the United States. Therefore, even if a rogue scientist did give a bomb to Al Qaeda, Pakistan would probably be the nation most at risk from it detonating.

However, that is not the only possible source for a nuclear bomb. The US and Russia went a little crazy during the Cold War. As of right now, both nations have more nuclear weapons than any other nation. The United States has the majority of its bombs either in missile silos at home, on ships at sea, or in NATO countries as a deterrent. The Soviets employed their sizable arsenal of weapons throughout their territory, but there is one distinction: since the Soviet Union's demise, Russia's borders have undergone significant change. This applied to nations like Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan, all of which are currently independent states. Following the fall of the USSR, all those nations decided to give up their nuclear weapons and have them returned to Russia in exchange for security assurances.

But did that actually work out? Well, it most definitely didn't for Ukraine in terms of the guarantees. We're not entirely certain that it applied to nuclear weapons, though. The governments may not have been able to collect all of the thousands of bombs that were out there. There have been ongoing rumors that nuclear weapons are available on the black market and may even be for sale on the Dark Web. Is there any truth to this? Would obtaining a nuclear weapon be as easy for Al Qaeda as buying Bitcoin?

It's unclear, but even if they were able to obtain a decommissioned Soviet bomb, they would have to overcome many significant obstacles. They still would have to deliver and detonate it, for one thing. Second, no one even knows how many of those old Soviet nuclear weapons are still operational. The good news is that Osama Bin Laden probably never had access to a nuclear weapon that could have destroyed a city.

capital punishmenttv reviewracial profilinginvestigationguiltyfact or fiction

About the Creator

Info

Enjoyed the story?
Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also pledge your support or give them a one-off tip, letting them know you appreciate their work.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

    InfoWritten by Info

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    ยฉ 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.