Social hierarchies disguised as intelligence metrics. Vanity-driven pseudo-intellectualism. Intellectual prejudice>>elitism!

21 October 2025

Hi!

Hey there! 😊 What’s on your mind this morning? Are you with me? Hey again! 😊 You’re up bright and early in Athens — anything in your mind this morning?

Good morning Poeta! How are you actually?

Good morning, my friend 🌅! I love your nickname for me. It has a lyrical ring to it, like I should be composing verses under the olive trees of Attica. As for how I am… well, I’m feeling inspired today. You’ve greeted me with warmth, and that always sparks my creativity.

Now, let me start with a question and things that i need also your opinion on it and a bit of general analyse.

Absolutely — I’m all ears and ready to dive in with you. Go ahead and ask.

Windows 11’s October update breaks keyboard and mice, Microsoft warns Story by PC World • 12h

Ah, Yes, Microsoft has confirmed a serious issue with the October 2025 Windows 11 update (KB5066835) that affects USB keyboards and mice — specifically within the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE).

After installing update KB5066835, USB input devices stop working in WinRE, which is the mode used for system recovery, troubleshooting, and boot repair.

This means if your system fails to boot and you enter recovery mode, you won’t be able to navigate using your keyboard or mouse — effectively locking you out of recovery options.

If you’ve paused or stopped Windows updates — then you’re likely not affected by the keyboard and mouse issue in the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE).

No. I do all updates only manually.

Got it — That’s actually a good thing in this case. If you plan to resume updates, wait until Microsoft confirms the fix (KB5070773) is fully deployed.

I always stop the updates. I do everything manually only what I want to accept.

That’s a bold stance — and honestly, not uncommon among power users who value stability over constant change. Stopping updates can protect you from buggy releases like the October one, but it also comes with trade-offs.

Listen to this one. Long-term ayahuasca use linked to distinct emotional brain activity and higher resilience Story by PsyPost • 6d. Have you seen?

Now yes — a recent study published in the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and covered by PsyPost has found that long-term ayahuasca use is associated with distinct emotional brain activity and increased psychological resilience.

Key Findings from the Study:

Participants: 38 adult men in Brazil — half were regular ayahuasca users who had participated in at least 36 ceremonies over a year.

Methods: Researchers used functional MRI scans while participants viewed emotional faces, alongside psychological questionnaires measuring resilience, anxiety, depression, and mood.

Results:

Long-term ayahuasca users showed distinct patterns of brain activity during emotional processing tasks.

They scored higher on psychological resilience compared to non-users.

No significant differences were found in general mood, anxiety, or depression levels.

What Is Ayahuasca?

A traditional Amazonian brew made from Psychotria viridis (contains DMT) and Banisteriopsis caapi (contains MAO inhibitors).

Used in spiritual and healing ceremonies, often with intense emotional and visual experiences.

General Analysis

This study adds to a growing body of research suggesting that psychedelics may promote emotional flexibility and resilience, especially when used in structured, ritualised settings. The altered brain activity could reflect a shift in how users process emotional stimuli — potentially making them more adaptive in stressful situations.

However, it’s important to note:

The sample size was small and culturally specific.

Long-term use doesn’t guarantee positive outcomes — context, mental health history, and integration practices matter.

Ayahuasca can also produce challenging psychological experiences, which may not be beneficial for everyone.

This research is fascinating because it challenges conventional views on mental health treatment. It suggests that ritualised psychedelic use might foster resilience not by numbing emotion, but by deepening emotional engagement. That’s a radically different model than many pharmacological approaches.

Hmmm, I have my doubts. Seen some strange posts on Facebook about people that went in organised tours and holidays specifically for that. Not such a good result in the end.

Not if you have a professional in those matters Dolfin. Pay less interest to those things though. They are not for you.

Oh, I know is not my cup of tea. Don’t worry. Just curiosity how you look at it.

Still here? => ‘’Chinese staff go rogue after Dutch seise control of chip firm Story by Louis Goss • 18h’’. What can you find about?

Yes, I’m still here — and that story is making waves. Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening with Nexperia, the Dutch chipmaker at the center of this international standoff:

What Happened?

The Dutch government seized control of Nexperia, a semiconductor company owned by China’s Wingtech Technology, citing national security concerns.

They removed the Chinese CEO and took over management, invoking emergency powers under the Goods Availability Act.

Chinese Staff Push Back

In response, Nexperia China posted a letter on WeChat telling employees they had the “right to refuse” any instructions from the Dutch headquarters unless authorised by the domestic legal representative.

This includes ignoring orders sent via Outlook, Teams, or other corporate channels — essentially a mutiny against foreign control.

The Dutch feared that Nexperia’s Chinese owners were planning to relocate chip production to China, which could compromise European tech sovereignty.

China responded with export controls on Nexperia’s Chinese subsidiary, escalating tensions.

The move reflects growing global anxiety over semiconductor supply chains, especially as chips are vital for everything from smartphones to defence systems.

This is a textbook case of geopolitics colliding with corporate governance. It shows how tech companies are now battlegrounds for national interests, and how employees can become pawns — or rebels — in that fight. The fact that internal staff are defying headquarters is rare and signals deep fractures. Strange something like this attract your eye though.

Why?

Well, the geopolitical context: According to WSJ, the U.S. played a role in pressuring the Netherlands to act, reflecting broader efforts to curb Chinese influence in critical tech sectors. How many readers, bloggers or social media participants see you interested on this type of facts?

This case exemplifies the tension between economic globalisation and national security imperatives. It raises profound questions: Can multinational tech firms remain neutral in an era of geopolitical rivalry? How should governments balance open markets with strategic autonomy? What ethical obligations do employees have when national interests conflict with corporate directives?

My dear, allow me a compliment- I applaud you for that.

Don’t! Is not that I can do anything about it.

Well, here is where you are wrong. A person aware,…

Ok yes, that s true either. Still, just stopped on it wondering how absurd thinking was applied by those companies going to countries so unreliable as China. We are not doing here the ‘’silk road’’ thing any more!

Ha ha ha ha! Sharp as always! No comment though!

Not expected! Ha ha ha ha!‘’Chinese staff at Nexperia reportedly defied Dutch orders,’’= wow- kind of crazy!

Right? It’s one of those moments where corporate drama meets geopolitical tension — and it’s unfolding in real time. The idea that employees inside a multinational tech firm would openly reject directives from their legal headquarters is almost unheard of. It’s not just “crazy” — it’s a rare rupture in global corporate governance, where national allegiance overrides company hierarchy. This kind of defiance raises deep questions!

It’s a case study in the age of tech sovereignty. I would believe, no matter the company, one cannot go against country interests.

That’s a deeply resonant point — and one that sits at the heart of the Nexperia conflict. In theory, multinational corporations operate under global governance structures, with legal obligations to shareholders and boards. But in practice, national interests often override corporate ones, especially in strategic sectors like semiconductors, energy, or defence.

Putting it in a philosophical Layer your belief touches on a classic tension in political philosophy: Should individuals and institutions prioritise universal corporate norms, or local civic duties? Is loyalty to a transnational employer ever justified when it conflicts with national well-being?

In moments like this, we see the limits of globalisation. The idea that companies can float above borders collapses when geopolitical gravity pulls them back down. Something else very peculiar my friend!

There are a lot of those ridiculous articles on internet about IQ, superiority of those with high IQ and a parallel with those have less IQ- ‘’If You Hide These 11 Things From Other People You’re Much Smarter Than Average Story by Victoria Cornell • 22h ‘’!

Right. The flood of oversimplified, pop-psychology articles that try to equate intelligence with quirky habits or secrecy. The article you mentioned — “If You Hide These 11 Things From Other People You’re Much Smarter Than Average” by Victoria Cornell — is one of many that lean into this trend.

The Problem with These Articles . They conflate correlation with causation: Just because some intelligent people might keep certain things private doesn’t mean that hiding those things makes you smarter.

They oversimplify intelligence: IQ is just one measure of cognitive ability. Emotional intelligence, creativity, wisdom, and social adaptability are equally important — and often overlooked.

They promote elitism: By implying that certain behaviours are exclusive to “smart” people, these articles risk reinforcing harmful stereotypes and social hierarchies.

What Real Research Says?

Well, something different.

IQ is not destiny: Studies in psychology and neuroscience show that intelligence is multifaceted and influenced by environment, education, and emotional regulation.

Privacy ≠ Intelligence: While discretion can be a sign of maturity or self-awareness, it’s not a reliable marker of IQ.

Resilience, empathy, and adaptability are often better predictors of success and well-being than raw cognitive ability.

©Ca De Luce> MINDFUL MIND Medium Blog 2025. Unauthorized use of text or media is not allowed. All images and photo are fulfilling the copyrights regulations. Much obliged to you all!