finance
Money talks; reviewing the global economy, government spending, taxes, and economic policy that affect our social and political future.
Stop Spending More to Keep Families Poor. AI-Generated.
American social policy contains a contradiction that becomes difficult to defend once the full ledger is placed on the table. Government can spend tens of thousands of dollars each year supporting a low-income family through child-care subsidies, food programs, housing subsidies, cash assistance, refundable tax credits, case-management systems, and payments to outside caregivers, while the family itself continues living with almost no financial margin. The family is officially poor, frequently stressed, dependent upon multiple agencies, unable to accumulate meaningful savings, and vulnerable to every unexpected bill. Meanwhile, taxpayers may already be spending enough on that family's behalf to provide the household with a substantially higher standard of living if even a discounted portion of those expenditures were paid directly to the family. The problem is therefore larger than inadequate assistance. It is an expensive system that can spend enormous sums around a family while leaving the family itself poor .
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast2 months ago in The Swamp
What the Border Numbers Actually Show
The argument over whether the true number was 14 million, 16 million, or 20 million points to a larger failure. The government failed to give the public a reliable answer about who came in, who stayed, who was released, who disappeared, who gave false information, who had criminal history, who had foreign ties, who received meaningful vetting, and who could be found and removed later.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast4 months ago in The Swamp
Tucker Carlson: MAGA and Trump Over.
Once upon a time, Tucker Carlson stood shoulder to shoulder with Donald John Trump. But even when Trump could do no wrong, and the Republican Party was under his command, Tucker Carlson, though a supporter, was not entirely taken in by the Orange One's aura. He and a few others, though they were supporters of Trump, always stood ready to advise POTUS if they thought he had taken a wrong turning. And this is exactly what Tucker Carlson did as Trump started his disastrous war with Iran alongside Israel.
By Nicholas Bishop4 months ago in The Swamp
Elegy for an ‘Exuberant’ Economist
With the death of Alan Greenspan, the journalists have performed some sloppy reporting. The first and most egregious error was in calling the late great Objectivist philosopher and writer Ayn Rand a Libertarian. She rejected the term although even the highest ranking Objectivists wouldn’t mind being called one as opposed to being labeled something worse.
By Skyler Saunders4 months ago in The Swamp
Op-Ed: Calling Sin a Sin Is Not Bigotry (Part 5). Content Warning. AI-Generated.
Series Note: This article expands the argument beyond the specific dealership call and beyond female-coded social aggression. The earlier articles examined a particular example, then moved into the broader problem of social aggression and identity-based deflection. This article addresses the deeper moral principle: no person should be protected from accountability because of sex, race, religion, sexuality, nationality, political tribe, trauma, victim status, social class, or any other identity category. Evil conduct remains evil conduct, even when the person doing it belongs to a group society has been trained to protect.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast4 months ago in The Swamp
Op-Ed: The Behaviors We Are Not Allowed to Name (Part 4). Content Warning. AI-Generated.
Series Note: This article marks a shift in tone. Though the first three articles used this dealership call as a case study, this article moves beyond that specific call to addresses the larger cultural problem: harmful patterns of conduct that people often recognize privately but are not allowed to name publicly, especially when those behaviors are more commonly associated with women, social power, emotional framing, and non-physical aggression.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast4 months ago in The Swamp
Identity Is Not a Shield for Evil Conduct (Part 3). AI-Generated.
(Time-Stamped Video Clip Summary: From 18:34-22:39, the call shifts from a normal pricing question into something more revealing. Tomi is asking basic questions about a $40,000 vehicle: the rebate, the in-person discount, the actual out-the-door number, and whether the dealership will confirm the deal over the phone. Instead of simply clarifying the pricing, the manager personalizes the resistance, later calling him “difficult” and “combative” before introducing the “male manager” implication herself. The clip matters because it shows how quickly bad conduct can hide behind identity once someone turns a practical dispute into a moral accusation.)
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast4 months ago in The Swamp
Trump is Happy with The Deal.
As Trump arrived at the latest G7 event, hosting world leaders from the G7 Trump arrived with a smile like a Cheshire cat. Trump said he was happy with the newly signed agreement between the Iranians and his own regime to supposedly end the war between them once and for all. Many are thinking we have been here before, and everything broke down before, while supposedly both nations were on a ceasefire. Can we hope that this time, better things can come of this and both sides can move on?
By Nicholas Bishop4 months ago in The Swamp
The Outrage Economy
It is ironic how similar the structures are on both sides. ActBlue and WinRed may serve opposite political teams, but they operate within the same kind of incentive system: turn moral outrage into money, lists, mobilization, and political power.
By Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast5 months ago in The Swamp
WW3 Coming Soon
WW3 Coming Soon The fear of a Third World War has returned to global discussions because of rising political tensions, military conflicts, economic rivalry, and growing mistrust between powerful nations. Many people wonder whether humanity is moving toward another devastating global conflict similar to World War I and World War II. While there are many causes of international tension, experts believe one major reason could again lead the world into great wars: the struggle for global power and dominance.
By Wings of Time 5 months ago in The Swamp
