Is survival ethics reasonable?

The form of existence is an ethical model in which we see our existence as a one-time, spatially, and temporally transient existence, an external and contingent existence dependent on the objective world. The objective world does not need our existence because we are not the original being of the objective world. We characterize ourselves and all living beings as accidental products attached to the objective world, as foreign beings with no origin and no basis for existence, so many people still believe that we are from an alien planet and are 100% foreign intruders. Whether we are objective accidental products or alien visitors, we have no essential relationship with the existence of this world. It is irrefutable that all these views are nothing but conjecture, the result of our deduction out of the logic of materialistic thinking, including even the materialistic understanding, which is the product of this logic of thinking.

We do not realize that the materialistic and idealistic view of the world is only a conception, a conjecture that cannot be self-consistent, much less provable. What is bad is not only that we come up with this illogical world, but that this way of thinking monopolizes and corrupts our minds and keeps us away from truth and reality forever, which is the deepest sorrow of mankind. This ethical model of existence can be analyzed for its rationality, and this analysis can in turn prove whether our survival model is reasonable. Should we exist on earth in the mode of existence? We exist in this ethical model, and if it is flawed, we will suffer from it, and worst of all, we will not know where it comes from.

What is the ethic of survival? The core logic is that we seek to survive, and we seek to exist for a short time, a few decades of transient existence to end our lives, a lifetime of irreversible transient existence for a few decades, which, crucially, is the purpose and meaning of human existence. This ethical logic presents an extreme contradiction: man is meant to survive, but man can only survive for a short time, and ultimately, inevitably, he cannot survive. What is the purpose of a transient one-time survival? What is the point? Note that the ethical purpose and meaning are being pursued here, not the original meaning of the phenomenon. Taking survival as meaning is our ethical principle, and has nothing really to do with the original meaning of human existence.

In other words, the concept of existence and the meaning of existence is a spiritual concept that is completely illogical and not at all self-consistent. If logic is not self-consistent, we are the ones who suffer, because our thoughts and ideas, our spiritual feelings, and behavioral activities all run in logic, how can logic not work? This is the reason why people have never understood the mystery of life and death. This logic is too tricky to let people go through all the pain and suffering to die, and this reasoning is not right.

The worst thing is not that people are bound to die, but how do people who are bound to die live? How do we treat the decades of life before death? This life is both irreversible and short, and it is also a one-time thing that can never be repeated. Each person's decades of life cannot continue and remain and must be used and thrown away. Therefore, no one's life is primitive and self-created, and no one can live a continuous and constant life. Each person is limited to living within a few decades, and the time-limited and closed nature of life as well as the irreversibility and disposability make it difficult and unacceptable. Why no one is not complaining about life is complaining about the contradictory logic of the ethics of life, an ethical concept that sincerely prevents people from living well and intentionally prevents them from living well.

Why do we choose and follow such a grotesque ethic of existence? It is all the fault of the clever human imagination. We have imagined the existence of an objective world and, as a result, the existence of living things, to explain the existence of the world for hundreds of millions of years, to explain the short existence of life and human beings. We are embarrassed and embarrassed by this imagination because this logic of existence cannot be deduced at all. Not to mention that where people come from will always be a mystery, where life comes from is also impossible to trace. It's not that we can't find the result, it's that the logic of our thinking and reasoning dooms us to no result, because the logic we use for reasoning itself is not valid, and a logic that doesn't make sense can have a reasonable result. Therefore, we have to create God and God to end the pursuit, and all the problems until God and God. How absurdly sad that such a simple, hasty treatment has been used by us for thousands of years, and that blind people are still convinced of it today.

Our greatest foolishness is not knowing that the ethic of existence is an absurd logic that is not only illogical but also extremely harmful. It makes us change from biological nature to human nature, and convinced that human nature is stronger than animal nature (nature), we use the survival ethic to measure the existence of everything and define the world and choose the world in terms of beings that do not exist. The most deadly poison of the survival ethic is that it destroys the coexistence of humankind with human beings, puts human beings in an ethical dichotomy, and makes human beings fall apart from then on, becoming the most irrational and the most potentially self-destructive species, the odd one out of hundreds of millions of years of biological species on earth, and the typical case of a typical smarty-pants, self-seeking species.

The absurdity of the survival ethic is revealed as soon as it is uncovered, and the absurd truth is revealed as soon as it is uncovered. We have been huddled in the survival ethic for thousands of years, and when we think about it, human beings are both pitiful, unfortunate, and lamentable, having wasted thousands of years of our wisdom and civilization.