Do I exist for the world?

What is the world? It is indeed too vague. It is generally thought that the earth and the universe are the worlds, the sky and the earth, the rivers and the mountains are the worlds, and nature and all things are the worlds. The theory is that everything that exists outside of me is the world. Once the world is concretized, we know even less about what the world is. What does that map of the world tell us? This geographic illustration only shows the area in which we can move; it does not express the true meaning of the world.

This is how we explain the world: "The world, in a broad sense, means all, all, everything. Generally speaking, the world refers to the earth on which human beings live. The world is also synonymous with heaven and earth, the world, this shore, the world, all things, the world, and so on. The world can also be interpreted as the sum of perceptible and imperceptible objective existence and the sum of concepts used to describe objective existence and its interrelationships, which exist without the will of man or other things. The world consists of the conceptual world and the material world, and the conceptual world contains the sum of all beings' perceptions of the objective world and the things that exist to record the perceptions." This is our universal understanding and interpretation of the world, and with this interpretation, our relationship between man and the world is determined and man is characterized.

We can no longer see people as the world; we can only be people in the world. Where does the world exist? We can only conceive of existence in a vast and infinite space. How do we know this? It is purely a materialistic conjecture about the objective world, for which we have no basis, much less any convincing. So, unluckily for science, they can only do their best to justify our materialistic conjectures, to find the origin of matter and the boundaries of the universe. Can we find the result? No, because materialistic logic dictates that the world has no boundaries, that it is an irrational world.

If we give up materialistic logic, the world is a completely different concept for us, a completely different perception and explanation. What is the world? In a nutshell, the world is my perception and our perception. The world does not exist in a fixed imaginary space and time, the world is my perception, and the world is me. The world is me. This logic seems incredible, but it is the truth of the existence of the world. The world is the presentation of my perception, which has the same nature as any part of my physical body, which is my physical existence in motion. I am the existence of the world; my physical body is only a certain part of the expression of existence, and my world is the expression of the whole. This means that I am in an integral and inseparable relationship with the world, what the world is I am truly what I am, and obviously, our physical body does not represent my existence.

There is no need to be overly surprised, it is an extremely simple logical fact that I exist as the world, only this simple fact has been misunderstood by us until now. What am I? I am the way the world exists, I exist as the world. The world is my perception, and I am the terminal of the integrated information accumulated and combined by perception. The world shows itself as existence through me, in the sense that I exist for the world. If I exist, the world exists, and if I do not exist, the world does not exist. Note that this refers to an individual human being, not to all human individuals. If I do not exist, the world presented by me does not exist. The world is presented by hundreds of millions of individuals, and if one person does not exist, hundreds of millions of other worlds still exist. Theoretically, if none of the hundreds of millions of people exist, the world will cease to exist.

What is the world? The world is the common agreement of hundreds of millions of us. The public world is part of our common agreement, and a large number of unagreed worlds exist in individual perceptions. Science is a good way to agree on the world, and we are agreeing on a larger, broader, and deeper world through scientific means and methods. But the agreed world must be based on the world of individual perception, that is, the world that each of us perceives is the basis of the public world, and without each individual's perception, this public world cannot be agreed upon and has no meaning to be established. This world is what we perceive and what is for us to perceive. The world begins and ends with perception, and therefore the world is nothing but our perception. The world is the world created by our perceptual movements and our behavioral activities. It is for us to perceive, and what do we perceive? To perceive the pleasure of existence. In short, we are here to create the world, and we are here to perceive the pleasure of the world.

Our original worldview is so wrong that it not only reverses our relationship with the world, but also separates us from the world so that the world is not the world, and we are not ourselves. This upside-down perception has baffled humanity for thousands of years, and has kept us in the world for how many years? The truth turns out to be so simple: each of us exists for the world, which is so significant that it is inconceivable that each person perceives a world, and we have a common world of whatever kind. The world is the result of our perception of each other.

We all exist for the world, the meaning and purpose of life is here, pleasure or pain is the ultimate result of our world, how do we choose? What kind of perceived world do we want to maintain?