Are Cell Phones Changing How Our Bones Are Shaped?

What if smartphones were so potent that they could alter the shape of our bones? This intriguing new debate has recently erupted in the media. It is based on a scientific study that claims using smartphones and tablets can result in significant, long-lasting changes to our bodies—and not in the ways you might expect. David Shahar and Mark Sayers, biomechanics experts from Australia's University of the Sunshine Coast, conducted a study in recent years. Biomechanics examines how mechanical principles apply to live organisms, such as how humans move and how insects beat their wings.

Since skeletons adapt to a person's lifestyle, Shahar and Sayers' study also includes osteo biography, which is used to infer information about a person's life from their bones. For instance, some unusually large skeletons were discovered on the Pacific island of Tinian in 1924; stone structures nearby explained the substantial nature of the island's bones by using heavy stones to build with. Shaw Heart and Sayers contend that contemporary technology is reshaping the bones of today's youth. What is causing this is something known as an EOP, or external occipital protuberance, according to some experts and In truth, the EOP is a growth of bone that may be discovered in the back of the skull and is connected to the nuchal ligament. Some critics have been more colorful and described it as a foam ball or a devil-like horn.

Let's go back to what the researchers were actually doing with the study in the first place by looking at chiropractors' x-rays of people between the ages of 18 and 86. This is an important ligament that plays a role in connecting Neck muscles to the skull. The EOP creates an effect that is somewhat like an anchor at the top of the nuchal ligament.

Shahar Sayers noticed that in young people the EOP appeared to be more widespread, so they hypothesized that young people's posture while constantly checking their phones and tablets was a major factor during screen time the neck pain. They also wanted to gain a more current understanding of how skeletons change because many of these x-rays were investigating things like neck pains automatically moves forward According to the theory, hunching forward creates additional pressure on the area of the sculpt-me-smuzzle in order to make up for it, the EOP steadily lengthens and eventually reaches several milliliters. The outcome is also known as text neck. The findings also showed that it was mostly detected in men, with Shah Harden Sayers reporting a larger Yi Opie and 67% of men compared to 20% of women based on a test group of 218 participants in 2016 and 1200 men in 2018 respectively. appearing to have a 5x higher likelihood of receiving these huge texts This new report has sparked discussions on the subject because it is the first instance in which experts are explicitly pointing out how technology is affecting our bodies. We often hear that radiation from phones may be linked to cancer, but what is the potential impact on humanity?

Shahar & Sayers described the elongated yo PS as a degenerative process, suggesting that things will only get worse for young people if they continue using their devices. There is also something called text thumb or thumb arthritis where the thumb can develop serious problems similar to the dreaded carpal tunnel syndrome. However, the study of EOPS and referring to them as horns suggest that things are only going to get worse for young people if they keep using their devices.

Whereas spikes has been attacked by others in the media, experts point out that the research is not definitive and that it includes assumptions just like any scientific paper. Longer skull bones are nothing new, according to archaeologists, and they are particularly typical in males. The overall consensus among the study's detractors is that there isn't nearly enough concrete data to support the assertion that using a cell phone actually transforms you into Hellboy.

If future generations are changing as a result of constant interaction with their devices, it is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. The question is whether Shahar and Sayers are on to something or if they are simply taking along established facts and fitting them into their own explanation.

The decision will finally be made by future archaeologists, who may or may not have large spikes poking out of the backs of their necks. As a result, perhaps there will be a little more walking in parks and less Angry Birds in the future.