Beat logo

Separating the Art From the Artist

"It's Complicated!" - Music Fan

By Lynn JordanPublished 2 months ago 8 min read
Top Story - October 2023
Separating the Art From the Artist
Photo by Clay Banks on Unsplash

Recently, Jann Wenner, the co-founder of Rolling Stone magazine and a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation member, released a book entitled “The Masters”. This book featured his interviews with rock legends who have become his friends. There is no arguing the influence the subjects of this book have had on Rock music. However, when questioned why there were no Blacks or women, his flippant, obnoxious, and frankly stupid response negated two demographics of rock 'n' roll's history as if they did not matter. He took his experience, privilege, and influence to brush off legends - whether he chose to acknowledge them or not - that built his career. It was an unfortunate reminder of how someone we hold in high regard can disappoint us in such a poignant and profound way.

He apologized, but apologies from people who should have known or done better are tiring and ring hollow. In an age of “cancel culture” one can argue it’s all gone too far, and everyone is too sensitive. Still, one can counter-argue that human progress demands we hold people accountable for being an ass, especially when it involves them being inappropriate, discriminatory, or cruel.

Music is everything. Nothing runs without it. People may love movies, but music fuels films and sets the mood, the tone, and the post-viewing euphoria that stays with us when we leave the theater. Our cars, stores, and restaurants have music blaring through speakers. Even parking lots have music playing. Music is the thread in the fabric of our existence.

For this reason, it is painful when a musician or prominent music industry member does or says something incredibly out of pocket, especially when that action or those words target the demographic of a fan.

Upset that your favorite artist has been accused of rape or other abuse? Perhaps a White listener quietly grimaces at being the target of Rap’s ire or jokes. Or a Black woman, hearing and seeing both the misogyny and the racism. Or, maybe you’re a man acknowledging songs like “Into the Night” and “Seventeen” hit different when you grow up and have a daughter. We’ve all been there, deciding whether or not to give that musician or industry icon a pass.

How do you separate the art from the artist? It isn’t easy, and like musical preference, it’s subjective. What may turn one off forever may only elicit a shrug from someone else who will remain a fan. Some fans will tolerate a lot from an artist until some line is crossed. For others, the artist may get “three strikes”; others may never care what the artist does if the music still moves them.

I write this article not because I wish to have arguments or make readers uncomfortable about their (or my) lack of empathy for the decision to abandon or continue to support an artist. It is more to hold ourselves accountable for the artists we support (and the excuses we make for them), the ones we don’t anymore, and if we are being hypocritical for shunning one and not another who may allegedly engage in similar behavior.

For example, I will never again purchase anything from a famous producer/artist/entrepreneur because of his alleged tendency to punch women. But do I have a weakness for a deceased Soul legend who was also accused of abuse and will sing his songs at the top of my lungs? I do. Also, I shrugged at a music icon’s questionable relationships with children because I wasn’t convinced; however, when a modern R&B singer was called out for manhandling underaged girls throughout his career, I stopped listening to his music well before he was convicted.

How do I reconcile that?

Sure, there are the details and whatnot, but the issue remains the same. Some music legends and noted professionals are documented criminals, abusers, pedophiles, racists, and misogynists. They can be horrible people whose fame frees them from the usual judgment and scrutiny. Clearly, we are not holding them to a higher standard, and even at their worst, few musicians are ever entirely “canceled”, as people in other professions often are.

Are we allowing them to be incredibly flawed because their artistry got us in touch with our deepest emotions in a world of shallow talk, questionable “celebrities”, embellished life stories, and photo filters? Are we allowing them to be awful because we gave them the power to captivate us at our most raw and vulnerable? Do we say, “BUT…they did xyz for this, that, or the other…” and that makes it all okay? Have we decided that an artist’s music or positive actions supersede anything else that makes them a terrible - or at least, a less likable - human being?

Using the prior example, a song from the deceased Soul legend was the first song I ever learned to play on my chosen instrument. My family would play his music at our gatherings, and we would dance and sing along. Was he abusive? Allegedly, yes. BUT did he stop a possible riot? Yes. Because his music tugs at my heartstrings and he is an icon in my community, will he get a pass from me while the alleged lady-punching producer will not because he did not have the same impact on my life? Apparently, yes.

That was tough to type. I despise hypocrisy, but I just displayed it, didn’t I?

This piece is not offering an answer; just thinking out loud and working through it. It wasn’t a particular moment that brought this topic to my mind. It’s a daily thing. The rock singer who assaulted underaged fans. The Blues legend who built that legacy on the backs of Black artists but has said some racist stuff. The Hip-Hop star who went way off the deep end and alienated just about everyone. The wealthy, iconic Hard Rock band that outright plagiarized other artists. The cantankerous Rock guitarist who legally adopted a minor so he could have his way with her. The mild Country hero who made nasty slurs to Charley Pride back in the day. The late Rap star that regularly beat his wife, a woman who was also his caregiver. The Metal drummer who abused children. Then there are the ones that are just jerks, treat their fans poorly, and say mean or stupid things to be disruptive. We could go all day with this. And the more varied your musical taste, the more distasteful acts you will find amongst your musical heroes. It can be a real bummer.

But how does one turn their backs on an artist who may have stopped someone from taking their life, written their wedding song, inspired a life change, or reminded them of a beloved person who has passed on? We don’t. Musicians allow us to live or relive a moment that touches us significantly. This differs from changing a makeup brand when you learn they test on animals or pulling your support from a candidate because they used your donation to buy themselves a platinum pen set.

This topic gets even more complex when you throw an entire band into the mix. A solo artist is easy; if they do or say something terrible, they may ruin their career. But a band with someone caught or arrested doing something evil can, at best, taint or, at worst, destroy the collective band members' years of hard work.

I was a superfan of a band for several years, loving their songs and live shows, which were always so inclusive, energetic, and fun. However, one member was caught on video saying something I didn’t appreciate. And, over time, I watched and listened to its lead singer say increasingly polarizing things, culminating in him finally doing and saying something unfortunate that could not be excused. Yes, he apologized, but I was done by then. I went from a superfan to giving away the band-related merch I had accumulated, including a one-of-a-kind shirt specific to him that had another band member's autograph and that of a bass legend who rarely made public appearances. I could not in good conscience wear it anymore, even though this band reinvigorated my passion for being a musician, and they performed the most cathartic shows.

During their original touring days, I was at so many shows front and center that a band member thought he knew me personally when I ran into him at an airport. He thought he knew me, but I clearly didn’t know them like I thought I did. However, when one of their songs comes on the radio, I will enjoy it. I will remember the great shows, the good times, and how they influenced me as a person and musician. I would like to forget how those shows got darker and more unpredictable to where I was unsure of my safety and when it eventually went sideways.

When they decided to do a reunion tour, some friends of mine couldn’t wait to go. Me? As far as I was concerned, that band had enough of my money; I had zero percent interest. My friends knew why, but it didn’t stop them from wanting to buy a ticket. People expect you to understand clinging to an artist but may not extend empathy when you articulate why you no longer or would never. It further demonstrated that most people don’t care about an issue unless it touches them personally. I wonder how many folks who attended that reunion tour are still mad at Beyonce’s infamous Halftime show a few years ago.

How do they reconcile that?

Will you ever cut an artist off like that crappy friend who abused your trust even though they may have walked you through the fire?

Separating the art from the artist is like that complicated relationship you dismiss until that vulnerable moment when you know nothing else will hit the mark or scratch that itch. Any regretful thought that comes with that regression is between you and that place in your heart the artist touched and still gets you all in your feelings.

Musicians are humans. Sometimes painfully so.

Apparently, we listeners are, too.

By Inkredo Designer on Unsplash

social mediapop cultureindustryhumanityfeaturecelebritiesbands

About the Creator

Lynn Jordan

Gen X writer of published music reviews now putting my fiction, non-fiction & the occasional poem out there. Every piece I write, regardless of genre, is a challenge accepted, and crafted with care and love. Sit a spell & enjoy!

Reader insights


Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!

Add your insights

Comments (13)

Sign in to comment
  • Angie the Archivist 📚🪶about a month ago

    Excellent… yes, with music and associated memories, it’s difficult to take a consistent stand!

  • JBazabout a month ago

    You add me think on many issues brought forth. To me, like many, music is the soul of life. I applaud you on your honesty on how you chose to listen or dismiss certain artists. Excellent article

  • C.S LEWIS2 months ago

    wow this is so great you can also join my friends and read what i have just prepared for you

  • Gerald Holmes2 months ago

    Very well written and very deserving of Top Story. You got me thinking!!

  • Caroline Jane2 months ago

    Great article. Incredibly thought provoking. Thanks for sharing.

  • Alex H Mittelman 2 months ago

    Yes! It’s always good to separate! I agree that artists are humans too! Good to know someone agrees! And congrats on top story!

  • Naveed2 months ago

    Congratulations on your Top Story Great work! 💖

  • Scott Christenson2 months ago

    Interesting article. I think if we dig deep enough there's something to dislike about almost every athlete, artist, celebrity or CEO, maybe due to their narcissistic personalities which gave them the drive to begin with. Interesting puzzle who sould be "cancelled" and for what? We can appreciate a Picasso painting without thinking about how awful he was to the people around him? For example, Ellen DeGeneres or Jimmy Fallon being verbally abusive to their employees is deplorable, but clearly not as bad as a Harvey Weinstein. I'm not that knowledgeable about rock music history, but I would say Stevie Nicks , the Pretenders and Jimi Hendrix are just as foundational to rock music as everyone Jann Wenner interviewed.

  • Naomi Gold2 months ago

    I have absolutely no problem separating the art from the artist because I’m a deeply spiritual person who never worships other humans. I think it’s wild how people will put someone on a pedestal only to knock them down. Why put them there in the first place? Why expect a human to be perfect? Real art doesn’t come from people, anyways. They’re just a vessel for it. I’m a half black woman, and I waste no time being offended when people I’ll never meet in my life don’t have black or female friends. I don’t give a fuck about “representation” either. We’re here to represent ourselves. It’s no one else’s job to be a symbol for us. That’s just more hero worship, more putting people on pedestals and living vicariously through them instead of getting a damn life of one’s own. I find all this push for “diversity” completely dehumanizing—because it’s NEVER for diversity of opinion! It’s for the most shallow shit, which is what “progressives” would reduce me to. I believe in holding people accountable, yes. But it’s not my place to punish anyone. I’m not God. Marilyn Manson’s music was everything to me as a teenager. If the accusations of sexual assault are true, then I hope the victims get justice. If they’re false, I hope he receives justice. Either way, I won’t be canceling his art. Now, if I knew him personally, and I found out he really did those things, would I personally distance myself? Absolutely. You are who you hang around. I won’t have monsters for friends. But to “cancel” a stranger and disregard their sacred art because of their human actions makes someone a self righteous tool in my opinion. I don’t “cancel” and I don’t befriend those who do, either. Let’s put more pressure on the legal system to actually work, and stop acting like it’s our personal duty to convict people. But if someone’s just a jerk, that’s not a crime. Again, I wouldn’t spend time with them. That doesn’t mean their artistic contributions to humanity should be denied. That would make me the jerk. Congrats on a most thoughtful and thought provoking Top Story! 🥂 Thank you for starting a conversation, as all good writing should.

  • Cathy holmes2 months ago

    Excellent article. Congrats on the TS.

  • C. Rommial Butler2 months ago

    Wonderful article! I often wonder as an artist whether I create the art or am merely a medium for its transmission. If the former is true generally, then we cannot separate the art from the artist, and must judge the two as one. If the latter is true generally, then we must always separate the art from the artist and judge the art independent of the biography of the artist. However, it may be that the former and latter are true for different people. A lot of entertainers became entertainers ultimately because of who they knew in the industry. It's a job, a role, a cult of personality they develop for the stage, for an audience--an intentional marketing ploy within a system that games itself toward specific demographics for profit. But artists are artists no matter what. My favorite example is Emily Dickinson, who didn't care to publish or be known, and whose poems we would not have if her sister had not defied her edict to burn it all. Among musicians, I would definitely include those Mississippi Delta blues artists who played music despite knowing they could acquire no great prosperity in a racist society, and undoubtedly played for the love of the music.

  • Terri Lynn2 months ago

    Well this piece is going to live rent free in my head for a bit….along with all the musicians and bands I have loved and then disliked for the various reasons you wrote about…🤔

  • Kendall Defoe 2 months ago

    I wrote a piece on Jann Wenner, and I applaud this piece! We all have to face this if we are fans of music, and film, painting, sculpture, dance, literature, sports, and so on. We all have to make that trade off and try to balance things that are uncomfortable. Well written and well said!

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2023 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.