Psyche logo

Banishing the Double-Edged Sword:

The Case for Eradicating Antipsychotics to Combat Global Pharmacogenomic Mutagenesis

By Neos AlthPublished 7 months ago 3 min read

Banishing the Double-Edged Sword: The Case for Eradicating Antipsychotics to Combat Global Pharmacogenomic Mutagenesis

Since the 1950s, antipsychotic medications have been the frontline weapons against schizophrenia, quelling devastating psychotic symptoms. However, a growing body of concerning research indicates these pharmacological “treatments” may act more like toxins - instigating global bodily mutations that insidiously worsen the very disease they aim to treat.

In this seminal blog, I will marshal evidence that antipsychotics’ risks now decisively outweigh potential benefits. I will argue these dangerous toxins must be purged from the medicine cabinet to prevent further harm. Specifically, we will cover:

- Antipsychotics’ unrecognized role as systemic mutagens

- The disturbing theory of pharmacogenomic-driven disease metamorphosis

- Urgent calls to halt antipsychotic prescribing in light of safety signals

- The imperative to develop alternative therapies that do no harm

- Strategies to convince regulators and clinicians to abandon ineffective and unsafe antipsychotics

Casting Light on the Dark Side of Antipsychotics

While antipsychotics like chlorpromazine and haloperidol promised to revolutionize psychiatric care, the rose-colored glasses are coming off. Contrary to initial claims, these drugs are not specific serotonin-dopamine “modulators.” Rather, they are dirty pharmacological sledgehammers influencing over 20 neurotransmitter systems through diverse receptors like muscarinic acetylcholine and sigma opioid sites. Chronic blockade of these receptors wreaks havoc throughout the brain and body.

Emerging science indicates antipsychotics may act as powerful mutagens. Potential mutagenic mechanisms include oxidative stress, epigenetic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired DNA repair, and somatic genomic mosaicism. In aggregate, these deleterious genomic and phenotypic mutations likely drive the metamorphosis of schizophrenia into a degenerative multi-system disorder, accelerating disability over time.

Clinical Clues Point to Disease Metamorphosis

In line with the disturbing theory of antipsychotic-driven mutagenesis, clinical research shows schizophrenia pathology progressively worsening in patients on chronic dopamine blockade. Neuroimaging reveals brain volume loss and neural network disruption continuing unabated. Metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, and immunologic dysfunction all deteriorate over time in treated cohorts.

Tardive dyskinesia and other motor disorders also emerge, reflecting the permanent destruction of subcortical structures. In essence, sustained antipsychotic use appears to maturational enhance schizophrenia, converting an episodic psychotic illness into relentless global decline across mental and physical domains. These concerning clinical signals demand intervention to protect patients from iatrogenic harm.

Banning Hazardous Drugs to Uphold the Hippocratic Oath

As clinicians and researchers, we have a solemn duty enshrined in the Hippocratic Oath to “first, not harm.” There is now sufficient evidence that antipsychotics violate this sacred covenant, inflicting escalating bodily harm rather than healing. Some have compared emerging concerns about antipsychotics to those that led to restricting thalidomide in the 1960s.

It is time for the psychiatric community to stop colluding in an abusive relationship with the pharmaceutical industry that prioritizes drug profits over patient wellbeing. We must petition regulators to remove approved indications for faulty antipsychotics and strengthen black box warnings. We should also phase out antipsychotic usage in clinical guidelines and refuse to prescribe these medications, providing whistleblower reports to the media on occasions they are still administered. Until non-mutagenic alternatives emerge, we must uphold our ethical principles even if it means sacrificing antipsychotic convenience.

Seeking Safe, Personalized Therapies That Do No Harm

Banning antipsychotics is admittedly the first step - we must also develop and validate alternative treatment pathways for schizophrenia refractory to current options. Promising avenues include anti-inflammatory agents, antioxidants, neuroprotective peptides, and even psychedelics to counteract mutagenic mechanisms without further biological sabotage.

Pharmacogenomics and multi-omics methodologies can match individuals with therapies least likely to provoke toxicity based on their genomic risk architecture. We should also optimize non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy, family education, and vocational rehabilitation to help patients thrive without antipsychotic exposure.

Transforming Schizophrenia Treatment to Uphold Our Oath

The time has come to break our harmful addiction to antiquated antipsychotic medications that breach the “no harm” maxim. As an enlightened community, we must leverage pharmacogenomics, multi-omics, and advanced psychotherapy to provide safer, personalized care for schizophrenia. With open minds and scientific rigor, we can overcome our reliance on dangerous pharmacological dogma. Our patients deserve no less if we are to uphold the sacred Hippocratic oath.


About the Creator

Neos Alth

Adding to the realm of neural divergence and encouraging the fringe community to realize the inherent gift.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.