Why Would Europe Want to Risk (An ALL Out ) Nuclear War

Let’s start with President Putin’s announcement of a partial mobilization of 300,000 troops in support of referendums in southern zones after Donbass regarding Russian intentions to use a vote in the referendum as rationale for joining the seized regions into the Russian Federation. NATO is in an uncertain situation. They forced themselves into the predicament. However, the enigma continues.

You may be aware that NATO has given Ukraine expensive military hardware, yet this hardware isn’t being deployed to protect Ukraine. In order for the Ukrainian government to launch offensive operations aimed at ejecting Russian soldiers from Ukrainian territory, including the Crimea and the Donbass, which Ukraine still claims as its own, it is being used to build an army comparable to the NATO. But from the perspective of NATO, President Putin’s actions have altered the frontlines of this conflict. The Ukrainians launched a major counteroffensive. but not in the south. Yes, they also attacked Russian forces on the frontlines in the south. In addition to liberating a few towns, they even caused the front to recede by a few kilometers. However, it increasingly appears that the massive advance in northeast Ukraine was merely meant to confine Russian forces.

It was a hit. Numerous towns in the northeast have been liberated from Russian rule. The areas of Kharkiv to Izium and Luhansk are driving the invaders back toward the Russian border. They just don’t have enough soldiers left to hold territory in northeastern Ukraine after transferring 10,000 men to the south and Kherson.

However, any future Ukrainian attack in such territories will be seen as a direct attack on Russia itself if all the Russian-conquered governments in south Ukraine are integrated into Russia or the Russian motherland.

That’s a whole other ballgame, and any assistance given to Ukraine to carry out such attacks means that NATO has turned Ukraine into an active combatant in which Ukraine is being used as a NATO proxy to attack the Russian motherland. NATO originally provided Ukraine with military technology for defensive purposes or to reclaim Ukrainian territory. Russia is attempting to set up a potential new boundary that would encompass all the captured territory.

All alternatives, including nuclear weapons, are available to defend the Russian Federation if it is on the table, as declared by Vladimir Putin. This game is totally different. Putin said that Russia doesn’t play practical jokes.

Putin said that Russia doesn’t play practical jokes. So what action takes NATO? Stop providing weaponry to Ukraine, admit that it was incorrect, or bet everything and see if the Russians are playing bluffs. We live in dangerous times.

President Putin needs evidence that he can reverse the tide after the defeat in the Kharkov region and the humiliations suffered at the summit in Samarkand at the hands of his friends.

He cites the annexation of Eastern Ukraine as proof. At the expense of the Ukrainian Judeo-Nazis, Russia grew ,if the captured territories vote for Russia

But for it to work, President Putin needs to halt the Ukrainians’ advance. To prevent impending enemy breakthroughs, our positions there require third and second lines of defense. There should be 300.000 more working men.

Putin’s plan is to observe while Europe implodes as a result of a lack of energy, nationalist disagreements, and general unrest if the battlefront lines are frozen.

Russia is turning the tide to perceive the Ukrainian counteroffensive as a trap in an effort to prolong the conflict throughout the winter and compel Europe to succumb before spring.

However, in the interim, the pressure cooker in Russia is heating up as a result of mobilization.

Neither the overall unhappiness of the public nor the financial difficulties brought on by sanctions and war expenses are the fundamental problems.

In an effort to drag out the conflict into the winter and force Europe to submit before spring arrives, Russia is shifting the tide to view the Ukrainian counteroffensive as a trap.

However, due to mobilization, the pressure cooker within Russia is heating up in the interim.

The main issue is neither the general discontentment of the populace or the financial hardship brought on by sanctions and war costs.

However, due to mobilization, the pressure cooker within Russia is heating up in the interim.

The main issue is neither the general discontentment of the populace or the financial hardship brought on by sanctions and war costs. Radical nationalists in the State’s military pose a menace. President Putin needs more believable victories than annexing their existing lands if he wants to keep the radicals in check.

What if Ukraine persists in its efforts and Europe refuses to give up?

Both the Presidents of Ukraine and Russia are evil men of this era, one who vogues around and prefers to be the proxy of others and the other who wants to be the kingmaker in the world. He wants to make sure his enemy will see mountains of burning rubble where the offices of the Ukrainian President and parliament once stood.

While Putin is in control of 1,000 nuclear warheads, it is challenging to understand why he might consider using nuclear, but if he has already used all available options, he may have every reason to do so.

If his winter ploy fails and other defeats are suffered at his country’s expense , the question for the U.S and NATO is whether it is worthwhile to challenge his Bluff because proxy holders won’t be bothered as much, as their country has already rubbled due to their leader’s acceptance to be a Proxy puppet. Many doubt if the country is worthy of saving ,China who has pumped into the country with billions before the War ,has not express any condemnation and has not offered any rebuilding Grant to save the country . the U.S is only famous for destroying other countries and is not even able to build their old roads and the border’s wall in their own backyard . The rest of Europe seems more eager to wait for a Blacksheep to lead their pack .

NATO and the US will decide what to do, as

Why Would Europe Want to Risk (An ALL Out ) Nuclear War