Journal logo

How to Boost Your Writer Engagement Levels

Because 'Read, Clapped, Followed and Subscribed' Ain't It

By The Dani WriterPublished about a year ago Updated 11 months ago 6 min read
17
Image by StockSnap from Pixabay

Just like the benefit of the doubt can be compared to a demilitarized zone, this is a hands-off, no-judgment arena. If, however, you (or someone you know) give a read-thru and make no attempts whatsoever to change…

What can I say?

I tried.

A substantial segment of the writing community notices your M.O.

The Backstory:

I am a member of a number of writing groups on social media, some specifically for Vocal Writers.

Practices that raise the ire of the committed membership…link-bombing

(see the well-explained post above by my writer friend Keila Aartila) or only writing something along the lines of “Read, clapped, followed, and subscribed,” does not cut the mustard as engagement, but is rather perfunctory. I read yours, read mine, and follow. It is the robotic response of a drill instructor and may not endear you to the author of whatever piece you’ve just read.

At best, you may be ignored or get a clipped response. On the flip side, you’ll probably get ‘dogged’ in front and behind the scenes from writers who don’t appreciate the abrupt/unfriendly/sterile/A.I.-ish characteristics of your approach to engagement.

Photo by Sebastiaan Stam on Pexels

Benefit of the Doubt Giving Me:

Maybe you’re a competent/struggling/aspiring/beginner writer yet still grapple with engagement.

Here are some tips that I’ll gladly divulge and you can practice all you want in the comments section below with no obligation or backlash.

Please, PLEASE don’t ignore this part of your writer development.

It's a big deal.

So, if you truly don’t know what to write but want to contribute something substantive:-

1. Find one thing that you liked (phrase, theme, anecdote etc.) and one thing that you would like to see developed more (imagery, media, literary devices etc.) in the written piece

By doing so, a connection is demonstrated with the writer. That writer has not been given a cursory glance. They’ve been seen. Now there are points that engender thought and reflection. The words used grant you an insightful persona. You’re not a bot anymore.

2. Ask relevant questions

Photo by Arek Socha on Pixabay

Not sure what to say? Delve into the writer’s backstory a bit. Ask for article context. Why did they choose to write this piece now? What overall message did they want conveyed? How did they conceptualize this approach to writing a personal narrative/short-story/poem/review? What makes their writing unique and how would they advise beginning writers to find their unique writing locus?

3. Ask for clarification

Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash

Not every reader understands a writer’s perspective, direction, or topic.

Hopefully, this is not news.

There are some written pieces that have left me more lost than that not-ever-proverbial missing dryer sock.

Any writer worth their salt shouldn’t mind being asked to clarify or elaborate based on feedback. It may also aid them by working more effectively to bridge a reader’s perspective.

Congratulations on instant engagement!

P.S. If any writer gives a mean answer to a sincere polite query, it automatically blips the radar of the Global Writers’ Collective (GWC). Stay in peace and do the figurative walk away. The GWC has eyes everywhere and elephant genes. They don’t forget.

Photo by Alexandre Debiève on Unsplash

4. Utilise any comparable personal experiences that resonate

Of course, the choice is yours on the level of depth.

For instance, if a writer shared an abusive relationship in graphic detail, you may not want to reciprocate in kind but you can respond with emotional sensitivity by stating, “The courage you have shown to share this is deeply moving,” or “I think the steps that you took to leave that relationship can be a helpful guide to those in similar situations.” Put yourself on the outside of the fishbowl. Find something positive and align with that.

Or if the topic is ducks on a lake and you have seen either ducks or a lake, or never want to see ducks or lakes, say so and why. It still beats “Read, clapped, followed, and subscribed.”

And I’ve seen that response enough times to strip emulsion paint off walls.

5. Write authentic comments

Don’t say you liked a written piece if you didn’t but please don’t say you hated it as an extreme. We’re writers with feelings here.

Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

The terrain we negotiate means that not everyone is going to enjoy reading what we write. (Is it understood that you don’t have to?) That’s how it works when you have individuals with their own minds, perspectives, likes, and dislikes. And therein lies the key to your response. Acknowledge some writer's unique expression and the chutzpah they had to share it on a world stage. Many don’t.

Every writer must start somewhere, so please don’t come in 'comment stomping', but don’t be phony either. Something as simple as “Thank you for sharing your piece with the community,” or “Your written work seemed like it was good therapy for you,” may be all the respectable feedback you need to leave.

True-blue writers will continue writing whether we get to see it or not. Whether it’s on a writing platform or not. They can improve (and not on anyone’s schedule but their own.) The quasi-writers in this for a quick buck, will soon learn the reality, so aren’t worth the worry.

6. Take the writing high road

Image by Volker Sachse from Pixabay

Closely connected with the previous point about authenticity, don’t stoop to low-level communication. Ask yourself before hitting that post button, ”Is what I’ve said uplifting? Encouraging? The type of thing I would want to read when having an off-writing day? As a newbie? Think of a writer you admire as a beginner, (since we all start as beginners) and imagine you are leaving them a comment.

Feel a little more thoughtful and compassionate?

*Virtual back pat*

Photo by Jeremy Bishop on Unsplash

7. Lead with a power adjective or phrase

A long response isn’t necessarily required with the right descriptive terms. Perhaps the written piece was:

• thought-provoking

• dynamic

• original

• insightful

• courageous

• hilarious

• ‘one for the record books’

• ‘made me smile/understand/take a step back’

• ‘provided a template/strategy for ______’

• ‘resonates with _______current issues’

8. Apply humor but use it well

Perhaps not the best time to test-run off-color jokes, especially with someone you don’t know well in a public arena. Absolutely nothing wrong if you’re not a comedian. This is the age of emojis, gifs, and video clips.

If you can’t convey the ‘hilarious hurl-face of disgust’ expression on your son’s face when he lifted the barbecue lid for the quick clean as per the ‘Easy Cleaning Tips’ article only to find last week’s poo-filled baby diaper mysteriously there and on reflex you ROFL-laugh, find a clip and leave a link between woven written lols.

Engagement won’t just bring you interesting discussions, fun knowledge rides, and followers. If you do it right, it will bring you friends who are writers.

Image by Ichigo121212 from Pixabay

Thank you so much for reading my story! Your support means a great deal to me. It would be immensely supportive of you to read more of my work below.

If you enjoyed this or any of my other stories, feel free to like, subscribe, tip, pledge, and/or share with friends and social media sites. If you wish to promote in other forums, you can secure permission @thedaniwriter

***

Originally published on Medium

listindustryhow toadvice
17

About the Creator

The Dani Writer

Explores words to create worlds with poetry, nonfiction, and fiction. Writes content that permeates then revises and edits the heck out of it. Interests: Freelance, consultations, networking, rulebook-ripping. UK-based

Medium

FB

Twitter

Insta

Reader insights

Outstanding

Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!

Top insights

  1. On-point and relevant

    Writing reflected the title & theme

  2. Easy to read and follow

    Well-structured & engaging content

  3. Expert insights and opinions

    Arguments were carefully researched and presented

  1. Eye opening

    Niche topic & fresh perspectives

  2. Compelling and original writing

    Creative use of language & vocab

  3. Heartfelt and relatable

    The story invoked strong personal emotions

  4. Excellent storytelling

    Original narrative & well developed characters

  5. Masterful proofreading

    Zero grammar & spelling mistakes

Add your insights

Comments (8)

Sign in to comment
  • Babs Iverson7 months ago

    This should be mandatory reading for all vocal members! Debating the idea of a test/quiz after reading! Loved it, Sand Sea Sistar!!!💕❤️❤️

  • Celia in Underland7 months ago

    A really interseting read with some extremely helpful and positive pointers -Thank you for sharing! 🤍

  • Some excellent advice here

  • L.C. Schäfer12 months ago

    I've just done that on Facebook - twice! Eeek! 😣 In my defense, I left a more engaging comment *here* on Vocal, and the FB comment was really only to show I was obeying the rules of the thread (read 2 links from others for every link you post). I actively ASK for feedback at the end of my stories. I say, "what did you like best and least about this?" or "did anything pull you out of the story?" Would you like to guess how many times those questions get answered? 😜😜 I feel like I'm asking a lot... not just for people to read my words, but then to come up with an engaging comment *as well*. So... I think I want to say THANK YOU for writing this and leaving me thinking maybe it's not so much to ask after all 😁

  • Helpful advice (I've seen several of things happening & had wondered, long before I even knew they're a thing). Excellent & engaging writing style, tinged with a delightful sense of humor. I have a question for you. Let me preface it with this: Editorial Note: In the paragraph beginning, "True-blue writers will continue writing...," you have the phrase, "The quasi-writers in this for a quick buck...," where "quasi-writers" is a contraction & so should be, "quasi-writer's". I do this because I'm a fan of great writing & I know I would certainly want to know if I had missed any errata in my own. But I'm always afraid it might offend someone. Every time I get a response, I fear someone is going to say, "Stick it!" or something along those lines. So far everyone has indicated an appreciation for the editorial eye & help (usually from writers far more creative & talented than I), but I still can't help but wonder. What do you think on the subject? (And no, I'm not asking because that was a suggestion you made. I really do want to know.) Oh, per Donna's "random" comment below: I've grown to love Stouffer's Vegetarian Lasagna. I would love to hear more about yours, even if it doesn't have a white sauce. (My wife won't eat it without a tomato-based sauce & I love it either way.)

  • Donna Reneeabout a year ago

    Lol’d several times while reading this and agree with you! Random but I am also intrigued by the vegetarian lasagne you mention in your bio haha

  • Shane Dobbieabout a year ago

    This is gold. Been guilty of a few of these sins myself but also received plenty. Made me think about my comments.

  • Loryne Andaweyabout a year ago

    This needs to be required reading before people sign on in any writer platform.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.