Tube or NOT Tube

Has YouTube changed how we research, learn, make money, create and generally live life? Some may say there are too many “experts” or “specialists” in the YouTube world and in general. How can over a million people be experts and the world still be in shambles? Will AI change this dynamic or make it worse? Are we relying too much on this platform to solve all of our problems, give us advice, show us how to get rich and be healthier human beings?

I would say, depending entirely on YouTube specialists can restrict openness to different viewpoints in several ways:

Restricted Perspectives: YouTube specialists might have a particular methodology or viewpoint that they suggest, which may not line up with different perspectives or systems. This can restrict the scope of thoughts and approaches that a person is presented with.

Closed Quarters Impact: In the event that a person just follows one or a couple of YouTube specialists, they might be presented to a restricted scope of thoughts and viewpoints, which can make up a protected and closed off environment. This can restrict their capacity to think in a fundamental and innovative manner.

Absence of Trial and Error: On the off chance that a person depends too vigorously on YouTube specialists, they might be less inclined to explore different avenues regarding groundbreaking thoughts or approaches. This can restrict their capacity to improve and track down better approaches to draw in with their social circle. This can be said about AI as well.

Thin Concentration: YouTube specialists might zero in on unambiguous specialties or subject matters, which can restrict open mindedness to different perspectives and thoughts. This can be dangerous for people who need to extend their skill past their ongoing specialty area.

People really should search out different points of view and thoughts from YouTube specialists. Obtain additional and different sources like books, digital broadcasts and different observers. This can assist them with fostering an all the more balanced way to deal with content creation and stay away from the impediments of depending entirely on one wellspring of data.

As the AI chats and platforms begin to dominate our search process, take notice of how much we depend on something/one else to think for us. The creators of the programs that filter your searches are few and between and will hold the keys to the kingdom, for those who lack the initiative to take the extra or different approach to data. Consider this, when the interent was introduced, people thought books and libraries would be gone by now. We still have a need for touching the pages and going some where outside our home to learn something new. This can be true for networking events, traveling, etc. We should take precaution of excessive adoption to a trend. The Zs and behind have no reference to what was and may have the most difficult time adjusting to the concept of balance and patience. So it's the generation before that need to lend a hand in guidance for the jolt that's coming soon.

The pressure of early adoption, the fear of missing out cripples many. Just like investment, taking on a risk that could potentially yield great rewards, is what intelligent beings have to learn how to do when calculating the odds. It's more than numbers, other factors are considered and without critical thinking it can challenging to achieve the success rate we anticipate. When we lean too much on the system or someone, we lose our power to think.

Humbly speaking, we should really manage our consumption of stimulation from one main source. How are we to maintain or develop curiosity, creativity and problem solving? We tread in the direction of embracing technology, yet we must also indulge in our humanist qualities that keep us grounded and winged-footed towards new inventions for the future generations.