Humans logo

‘Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time’: A Moving and Deeply Personal Documentary About a Great Writer and Friend

So it goes...

By MovieBabblePublished 3 years ago 3 min read
IFC Films

Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time is not a conventional documentary, though that was the original intention. Its inception started nearly forty years ago, in 1982. Robert B. Weide had just finished a well-received PBS documentary on the Marx Brothers. Weide, twenty-three years old at the time, sent a letter to one of his literary heroes, Kurt Vonnegut, requesting his ‘authorization’ to create a documentary on his life and work.

Weeks went by, Weide gave up on the project. Then suddenly, a letter came, and having devoured Vonnegut’s Breakfast of Champions continuously through high school, a book filled with the author’s signature doodles and occasional handwriting, Weide knew the letter came from the great man himself.

Vonnegut would give Weide his blessing, trusting the young filmmakers’ creative sensibilities after having seen the Marx Brothers documentary. Soon they would meet. What initially started as a friendly professional relationship for Weide, turned into a lifelong friendship. Vonnegut would share countless letters, pictures, even black-and-white camera footage of a young Vonnegut playing around with his two siblings.

They say one should never meet their heroes. This timeless expression exists for a reason, as we’ve seen countless examples of respected public figures being exposed as troubled individuals, even deviants. We must be wary of putting these individuals on a seraphic pedestal. People are people, no matter how great their artistic output.

But Robert B. Weide did meet his hero. As Weide states in the film, he was afraid that their friendship would impede on the documentary.

The title of the film will be instantly recognizable to those privy to Vonnegut’s seminal work, Slaughterhouse-Five. In the aforementioned novel, the character of Billy Pilgrim travels back and forth in time on a whim, experiencing everything out of order. The film takes a similar, almost fractured narrative style, using the magic of editing to take the occasional detour through time. We might focus on a youthful part of Vonnegut’s life before suddenly being pulled into the future, where we see an aging Vonnegut addressing a large auditorium packed with devoted fans.

Nevertheless, the film doesn’t go too far with it. It never becomes an abstract look at someone’s life. We get a sense of the chronological life and times of Kurt Vonnegut, where it began, what happened in between and where it ended. It just has fun with it, as in the spirit of Vonnegut’s written work. It doesn’t care about adhering to a conventional narrative.

The film’s structure is partly an ode to Vonnegut’s most famous literary work, but there’s also a more personal aspect to this structure. The film is not just about Vonnegut’s life but about Weide’s recollections of the late author. We see how Vonnegut influenced his life, how important his time with him was.

In some way, the film is almost structured like the fractured memory of Weide, reflecting on the relationship he had with Vonnegut.

The film doesn’t just honor his writing, it honors his illustrative art as well. Excerpts from his books are adapted with animation inspired by Vonnegut’s signature art style.

What audio is available from Vonnegut is brought into the movie, but many real-life letters or literary excerpts are narrated by actor Sam Waterston, whose voice is remarkably similar to the late author.

Even with its unconventional nature, the film does fulfill the obligation of your standard documentary regarding an artist. It examines the subject, where he came from, what might have inspired him, what impact he had on the relevant world of his craft.

But it’s also about what kind of person he was. It’s a labor of love, not just for the art but for the man itself. This is hardly surprising, as the filmmaker became intimate friends with the subject. One could hardly expect the film to be impartial. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The film isn’t a political statement. It’s a cinematic eulogy by a filmmaker who loved him.



movie review

About the Creator


The Casual Way to Discuss Movies! Head over to to see all our content!

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.