"Human nature is good" or "human nature is evil"?

Human nature belongs to the philosophical category which marks objective reality. Generally speaking, human nature is an objective substance, human nature of the human genome gene mutation and gene recombination is the change of individual human nature or different human population in the statistical sense of the direct cause of human nature, the external "natural selection mechanism" on gene mutation and gene recombination is the indirect cause. Human nature is not subject to human will. Einstein's theory of relativity points out that there is no absolute time-space reference system, similarly, there is no absolute reference system for morality, so human nature produces different moral observations such as true, good, beautiful, false, ugly and evil under different moral reference points of different people. Relative observations cannot be regarded as essential in a philosophical sense. To unite humanity and morality with the material unity of the world. This conclusion is by far the most accurate interpretation of human nature in the entire history of civilization. The theory of good nature and the theory of evil nature are both subjective idealist views. These views not only look at problems one-sided, but also regard people's subjective feelings as objective attributes of things, which itself violates the philosophical premise that matter is the first nature, consciousness is the second nature, and matter determines consciousness.

Mencius advocated the original good, Xunzi advocated the original evil. In terms of the method of human nature towards goodness, Mencius advocated that the goodness could be carried forward by nurturing and cultivating the germ of goodness through enlightenment. Xunzi holds that the evil of human nature can be transformed into good by limiting the evil tendency through enlightenment.

Maybe that's not accurate, because the stick killed everyone, or maybe it's more accurate to say human weakness.

Continuous two things happened today, let me doubt of human nature, the incident: we borrowed school of Tibetan robe, finished need to return to college, as we buy milk at the same time, classmate say I go out to buy rice, then he put his own Tibetan robe also went to college, can conveniently take my a piece of the past, but he didn't. This is a small thing, can reflect a matter I can not understand, why would do so, whether people are so selfish. Incident two: after returning the Tibetan robe, I went to reapply for the campus card. He said that HE needed to prepare the student ID card. I said that I would take the student ID card and then come down. He thought only of himself leaving work, not of the students who could not have lunch without a campus card. Everyone is selfish, thinking only of their own interests. There are too many of them.

I wonder if a man who can think of others will be more successful in the future than a man who can only think of himself. A person who can think of others is not a good person. Who is a person who can think of other people!

When you eat meat, do you think the animal wants to be eaten by you?

When you play a game, do you ever think that the player wants to be killed by you? The same!

Human nature is not evil only because different causes show different phenomena.

Treat the world as you want it to treat you.

When man was born, helpless children lay there quietly, so man was born good. And with the extension of time, from the original sexual close, into a distant, began to appear a variety of trends. Since people are born to survive first, so human nature is selfish, in order to obtain more selfish conditions, they begin to become less docile, so people are easier to evil than good. Because easy evil is difficult to good, just need all kinds of laws, regulations, systems, rules and other constraints.