Critique logo

Casino Royale

My #7 Book of 2025

By Matthew J. FrommPublished 9 months ago Updated 9 months ago 2 min read

Casino Royale by Ian Fleming

Hmm.

Hmmmmm.

In the 73 years since first publication, James Bond has wormed his way into the zeitgeist as a sex symbol, womanizer, undeniable Secret Agent with a license to kill.

Yet, in his debut, all of those traits are subverted in a succinct 212 pages. Incredibly sexist, slightly racist, and dangerously thrill addicted, the James Bond of Casino Royale bears a closer resemblance to Maxwell Smart than the dashing Sean Connery.

It’s a book that offers both a look into the time period, yet is still very accessible to a modern audience. The pacing is excellent—this is another one that I finished in a weekend.

Surprisingly, what I found most ingenious was the use of Bond’s Misogyny to punctuate the Femme Fatale Vesper. In the end, it’s his disbelief that she cannot be competent enough to betray him that is his undoing. It’s a prime example of how you can round a character to a negative trait to create a logical and satisfying ending for both the plot and character arc.

I ended up taking off points for its rather straightforward prose and for being reliant on flat side characters to advance the plot. Still, they’re fine.

All in all, I had low expectations for this and was pleasantly surprised by the overall quality and the quiet subversive themes. I’m interested to see how long into the series such quality lasts for.

I’ll leave this with a final note, more for myself than anyone else: it is okay to have a main character with unresolved negative traits. Not every main character must be a paragon. Not every character must unburden themselves of their “isms”. Skillful writers know how to use that to their advantage and let the themes ride the subtext.

Final Grade (all out of ten):

Plot: 8

Characters: 7

Conflict: 8

Theme: 8

Setting: 9

Prose: 7

Tone: 8

Quality: 8

Impact: 8

Enjoyment: 9

Overall: 80/100

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A/N:

Over the next ten days I’ll be releasing full reviews of my top ten books of 2025. From there, I plan on publishing a weekly book review. I’m hoping this is a way to keep me reading regularly and academically.

A quick note on my grading philosophy which I formed listening to a few movie critics. I believe that a 7 in any of the categories above constitutes “Good”. Anything above that is something that is above and beyond in any one particular category. I believe this creates a more nuanced evaluation of any Story. Very, very rarely do I give scores above 90 (8 since I started grading books back in 2022). Consider anything a 70 or above the equivalent of 5 stars. You may note that some entries are tied. The tiebreakers are the higher individual score in Enjoyment, then Impact, then Quality, then back up to Plot and descending from there.

I also want to expand my Substack presence. Toss me a follow below!

If you've enjoyed this, please leave a like and an insight below. If you really enjoyed this, tips to fuel my coffee addiction are always appreciated. All formatting is designed for desktops. Want to read more? Below are the best of the very best of my works:

EssayMoviePacingArtSettingPlot DevelopmentFictionOutlineDialogueStructureScreenplayDraftCharacter Development

About the Creator

Matthew J. Fromm

Full-time nerd, history enthusiast, and proprietor of arcane knowledge.

Here there be dragons, knights, castles, and quests (plus the occasional dose of absurdity).

I can be reached at [email protected]

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also become a paid subscriber, letting them know you appreciate their work.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Matthew J. Fromm