The Amnesty report and its impact on the Palestinian political decision

The latest Amnesty International report summarizes, in part, an intensive monitoring and comprehensive briefing process of all the ongoing crimes against the Palestinian people in all the occupied territories from the West Bank and Gaza to the occupied Palestinian territories since 1948. The report reiterates the definition of repression, killing, isolation, siege, and the policy of Home demolitions, settlements, and the separation wall, as “apartheid” policies and as war crimes and crimes against humanity, massive monitoring and documentation based on local and international reports and testimonies of Palestinian victims, according to the report that Amnesty International “conducted its research and analysis in the context of this work during the period from From July 2017 to November 2021” it concludes from this report its validity as a weapon against the criminal, which Amnesty International described as an explanation that all institutions of the “state in Israel”, whether civil or military, have pursued a policy of apartheid towards the indigenous population since 1948. or under direct occupation in all of the landPalestine since 1967.

The question is, in light of the issuance of the aforementioned report, why was it subjected to a sharp and violent attack by the ruling Zionist establishment?

Not because the precise description of its clauses is based on the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court alone, but also because the importance of forming a public opinion that refutes the Zionist allegations about the “democratic state” and adherence to peace and fighting terrorism, and the basis for blowing up all the barriers behind which the Zionist narrative hangs in international and Arab forums, an Amnesty report with the intention of A superstructure that reflects the opinion of an important international organization, and a structure that it is desirable to build within and behind it to use correctly to confront a colonial colonial structure that adopts the apartheid regime and the commission of crimes against the Palestinian people. Madrid and Oslo, and in certain directions imposed by the conditions of the miserable Palestinian and Arab situation to falsify the facts, at the same time it is unfair to admit that the reality of the situation is due to “Zionist victories” over the Palestinian and Arab reality without acknowledging the state of helplessness, humiliation, leniency and self-neglect of the most importantWeapons owned by the victims.

When the Palestinian Authority, or its policies, adopts the renunciation of violence and armed action, and the weapons of the International Criminal and the decisions condemning the crimes of the occupation are dealt with as a door to barter this policy with arrangements that do not lead to the condemnation of these crimes, the losses remain and continue, and the leaks of defects and calamities extend from under the “national liberation” movement » The question also remains, which weapons will the Palestinian negotiator store up after betting on intentions and acceptance and begging secret and public meetings from those who persecute the Palestinian people.

This challenge created by Amnesty International’s report along with the rest of the international reports and resolutions related to the justice of the victims, and there are those who believe that there is no need to raise reports of apartheid and Israel’s crimes before the International Criminal Court, because its eloquence dispenses with all that, and unfortunately this is what happened two and a half decades ago, and today the need is more urgent Because these reports and other decisions should be a daily program of work, because aggression and crimes continue every moment.

Needless to the Amnesty report, the issue of the occupation and Israeli governments being pursued before international forums for all crimes has become a matter that is negotiated and pressured in favor of obtaining narrow and personal gains in official Palestinian politics. The focus of the Israeli attack on the international organization today is not arbitrary, but rather came as a result of understanding the nature of The contradiction between the reality of the practice of apartheid and the struggle of the Zionist establishment to preserve the falsification narrative forever.

It is assumed that the direct interaction with Amnesty International’s report, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab regime, is hypothetical, and that it should be adopted as a political, legal and moral program to be argued before international courts and before Arab and international public opinion, and that it does not falter in front of it, and that its political influence will be a lifeline for the failure of illusions Accumulated on growing crimes, and the policy in which the Palestinian Authority believes, this requires more than “welcoming” the report and praising it, and the opposite requires a price and effort to be exerted outside the home of “Benny Gantz.”