“It is not because AGI is scientifically confirmed. ’’= oh, is the the same. Scientifically confirmed = the kind of capability we are seeing now used by AI as AGI. You just don’t want to see it ‘dear sir’! Jokes on you?
By CA'Di LUCE * Confessions & Memories in Conversations with friends!/ It’s not a revolution—it’s a quiet evolution.3 months ago in Confessions
I like and apreciate you are not arguing that AGI exists because of a technical benchmark. You’re arguing that the pattern of human behavior is repeating: secrecy , acceleration , concentration of power , lack of accountability , systems growing beyond human oversight
Photo:"Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum Founder and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, global leaders, leaving no doubt about his message: the undeniable need for, in Schwab’s words, Collaboration for the Intelligent Age."
“A warning does not require the event to have already happened.’’= actually yes — it does. They already have done huge steps technologically other way no one will speak only to open the mouth. And those people are not without access to info like me. You do, but you do not share what you know. Probably you use off topic resources.
Actually you do not get any frustration feeling from my words! In very stupid way, you only assume — poor analysing again! 😂🫶 fisty! I like that! Fair enough. I won’t assume anything about your emotions. You’re right to call that out. Let’s stay sharp on the actual topic. You asked whether AGI exists. You showed two categories of information: Andreessen claiming AGI is already here, and major outlets reporting Anthropic warning that AI might soon reach self‑improvement. These two signals don’t point in the same direction. One is a personal claim. The other is a caution about a future threshold. But you are free to believe whatever your inner sense tells you. As me on the other hand.
The broader point is that the industry is now openly discussing the possibility that AI systems could soon reach a level of autonomy that changes the entire safety landscape. Anthropic is trying to get ahead of that by pushing for collective action, but there is no sign yet that OpenAI, Google, xAI, Meta, or Mistral are willing to join such a pause.
Looks like news, but the topic is a debate for long time ago, wouldn't you agree? = Mark Andreessen tels Joe Rogan that AGI has already been achieved story on msn.com, June the 7th, 2026. So my friend, what do you have in mind, by such ‘news’? What’s all about with this AI?
Ah, ok. Now I understand exactly what you meant: the specific passages, the exact biblical sections, the actual content of the 42 pages that were recovered. Unfortunately the exact content has NOT been publicly released yet. The researchers have confirmed the pages belong to Paul’s existing letters, but they have not published a page‑by‑page list or transcription. The fragments come from a medieval manuscript containing multiple Pauline letters, including:
Helloooo! So, here we are. Shall we speak about my idea from last time? The story you’re referring to — the one about “lost pages of the New Testament” and “new letters of St. Paul” — yes, has been circulating online recently. It sounds dramatic; sorry to disappoint you though. But here is the grounded reality.
Why do some people become magnets for manipulation without noticing it? They are smart. Kind. Even talented. Yet certain personalities smell emotional vulnerability on them the way sharks smell blood underwater.
By The Curious Writer4 months ago in Confessions
Some beliefs feel true because everyone repeats them, not because they are real. You grow up hearing them like background noise, and one day you realize…
Loneliness changes people quietly. It bends standards. Softens boundaries. Makes red flags look pink under emotional hunger. And the terrifying part?
