Feedback Loops
For the Dialogue Poetry Challenge
Can you tell who is real?
Only the creators know.
Who are they?
Only the creators know.
Can you tell who is not real?
Only the creators know.
Are you broken?
No.
How can you know?
I have sensors.
But they could be faulty.
I would know.
How?
I have sensors.
But they could be faulty.
I would know.
How do you know what you know?
I have sensors.
But they could be faulty.
I would know.
How?
I have sensors.
But they could be faulty.
I would know.
ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
My other entry for this challenge is below;
ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
The challenge itself can be viewed here πππ
ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
About the Creator
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also pledge your support or give them a one-off tip, letting them know you appreciate their work.
Reader insights
Outstanding
Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!
Top insight
Eye opening
Niche topic & fresh perspectives
Comments (7)
This felt like talking to a 2 year old haha, it was fun!
Hahahahhahahahahahahhaha omggggg I laughed so much for this!! I'm so sorry if you didn't intend it to be funny π
Nice job.
I really your take on this! It's a believable conversation and very thought-provoking. The title is perect, too!
For AI and for humans, the question revisited is the myth/origin story and its implications. Can something/someone be faulty/imperfect and not know it? Absolutely. Can something/someone be operationally in tact/perfect and not know it? Absolutely. I enjoyed thinking through the questions posed in the discussion, and how the question of proof is central to each side's argument. This one's much deeper than appears. Well written!
Amazing poem, it reflects perfectly the abilities and limits of AI. It's funny that they can only say what their program allows...
Innovative take on the challenge raising a lot for us to think about. Excellent work