Criminal logo

The 9/11 conspiracies

Was 9/11 actually a planned attack?

By Daim AliPublished 12 months ago 4 min read
1

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, were one of the most devastating events in modern history, with over 3,000 people losing their lives in a matter of hours. In the aftermath of the attacks, a number of conspiracy theories have emerged suggesting that the US government was involved in some way. In this blog, we'll explore the main arguments put forward by proponents of the 9/11 conspiracy theory and the evidence that has been presented to support and refute these claims.

One of the central claims of the 9/11 conspiracy theory is that the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition, rather than by the impact of the planes and the subsequent fires. Supporters of this theory point to the way the towers collapsed, which they argue resembles a controlled demolition. They also suggest that the fires burning in the buildings were not hot enough to cause the steel to weaken and collapse.

However, experts have disputed these claims, pointing out that the impact of the planes and the subsequent fires caused the steel to weaken and ultimately fail. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings and concluded that the structural damage caused by the impact of the planes, combined with the intense heat of the fires, led to the progressive collapse of the buildings. The NIST report found that the fires were hot enough to weaken and deform the steel, leading to the failure of the floors and ultimately the collapse of the buildings.

In addition, no credible evidence has been presented to suggest that a controlled demolition took place. Controlled demolitions typically involve the use of explosives placed at key points throughout a building to bring it down in a controlled manner. However, there is no evidence of explosives being used in the Twin Towers or in Building 7, which also collapsed on 9/11. The debris from the buildings was also thoroughly examined for evidence of explosive residue, but none was found.

Another claim put forward by conspiracy theorists is that the US government had prior knowledge of the attacks and allowed them to happen in order to justify going to war in the Middle East. They argue that the government was aware of the threat posed by al-Qaeda and deliberately ignored warnings in order to create a pretext for war.

However, there is no evidence to support this claim, and it is contradicted by the findings of the 9/11 Commission, which was established to investigate the attacks. The Commission found that the attacks were the result of a "failure of imagination" on the part of US intelligence agencies, who were unable to anticipate the possibility of terrorists using hijacked planes as weapons. The Commission also found that while there were some warning signs, such as the so-called "Phoenix memo" that warned of terrorists taking flight training in Arizona, the information was not specific enough to prevent the attacks.

Some conspiracy theorists have also suggested that the Pentagon was not hit by a commercial airliner, but rather by a missile or other type of weapon. They argue that the damage to the building was not consistent with the impact of a plane, and that there is no photographic evidence of a plane hitting the building.

However, this claim has been debunked by multiple sources, including eyewitness accounts, photographs, and the wreckage of the plane, which was recovered at the scene. Eyewitnesses reported seeing a large commercial airliner approaching the Pentagon and striking the building, and there are numerous photographs and videos that show the impact of the plane and the subsequent damage to the building. The wreckage of the plane was also recovered at the scene, including the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder, which confirmed that a commercial airliner was responsible for the attack.

It is important to approach conspiracy theories with a critical eye and to evaluate the evidence carefully before accepting them as fact. While some of the claims put forward by proponents of the 9/11 conspiracy theory may seem plausible at first glance, a closer examination of the evidence reveals that they do not hold up to scrutiny.

The tragic events of September 11, 2001, were a devastating blow to the United States and the world as a whole. While it is natural to seek answers and explanations in the aftermath of such a traumatic event, it is important to base those explanations on evidence and facts, rather than speculation and conspiracy theories.

As we continue to remember and honour the victims of 9/11, let us also remain vigilant against misinformation and conspiracy theories that seek to distort the truth and undermine our shared commitment to freedom, democracy, and justice.

capital punishmentinvestigation
1

About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.