Proper Channels
bureaucratic horror, crime horror, psychological horror, serial-killer procedural, black comedy, municipal gothic
At St. Brigid’s Municipal Crematorium Chapel, we have a form for everything except embarrassment.
Detective Elias Mercer arrived at eleven forty-three in the morning inside a walnut-colored coffin with brass handles, accompanied by six police officers, three municipal administrators, one former wife, and a sealed envelope marked PERSONAL EFFECTS — DO NOT INVENTORY. Naturally, I inventoried it.
I am a funeral director. Curiosity is not technically among my duties, but neither is pretending a dead policeman was respectable.
Gray Harbor preferred the latter.
The department sent me a seven-page instruction sheet for Mercer’s service. Page one concerned flag placement. Page two concerned the approved pronunciation of his rank. Page three specified that no speaker should make reference to “pending allegations, disputed investigative narratives, extrajudicial conduct, or speculative victim counts.”
Page four was blank.
Government has always known the dramatic value of white space.
I had known Mercer professionally for eleven years, meaning I had buried people he had arrested.
In 2012, Holloway & Finch Investigations had been hired by three families who claimed Mercer routinely arrested people without adequate cause, discarded or failed to preserve notes, and reconstructed his reasoning later. The firm’s report found the allegations credible. Their investigators described missing notebooks, conflicting booking times, vague statements written days afterward, and court appearances in which Mercer could produce remarkably little contemporaneous documentation.
Even at trial, according to the surviving case material, there were cases in which there were effectively no usable notes.
Nothing supernatural occurred.
Nothing especially complicated occurred either.
People complained.
Supervisors requested clarification.
Clarification became review.
Review became an internal matter.
An internal matter became a personnel issue.
A personnel issue became confidential.
Confidential became finished.
The machinery functioned beautifully.
That was the frightening part.
By 2020, Holloway & Finch had reopened their Mercer file for a different reason.
People previously associated with him had begun appearing in old missing-person files, unidentified-remains comparisons, abandoned investigations, and family complaints nobody had thought related. No single document said Elias Mercer was a murderer. Documents are rarely so vulgar.
Instead, there were dates.
Addresses.
Traffic stops.
Names written twice.
Names written nowhere.
One investigator noticed that Mercer had possessed an unusual talent for being the last official person to record seeing someone alive.
Another noticed he sometimes wasn't even that considerate.
There were whispers of children as well—seven disappearances that later became attached to his name in rumor and private investigation. I will not describe them. There is a point at which detail stops being evidence and becomes entertainment, and Mercer already had enough people doing public relations for him.
The number seventy came from Madame Irena Vale, a tarot reader operating above a laundromat on Calder Street.
She told a local podcast that she had “counted seventy dead around him.”
The department dismissed her immediately, which was reasonable.
Then they spent considerable effort making sure everyone knew they had dismissed her.
That was more interesting.
No responsible investigator treated her reading as evidence. Holloway & Finch certainly did not. But the number began circulating because human beings enjoy round numbers when confronted with shapeless horror. Seventy sounded like an accounting total. Gray Harbor respects accounting totals.
The ugliest story was not part of any official count.
According to one former associate, Mercer once concealed the remains of a victim inside a wall during a renovation while a friend worked nearby, then later described the concealment as a joke because the friend had not noticed.
Whether the anecdote was precisely true was never established.
What mattered was that three different people independently remembered Mercer telling versions of it.
Always smiling.
Never laughing.
People imagine killers as men who cannot control themselves.
Mercer seemed to enjoy control very much.
He was shot to death during a home invasion in late October after apparently entering the residence himself. The surviving homeowner said Mercer had forced his way inside shortly after midnight. Mercer was armed.
The homeowner was cleared.
Thus Elias Mercer achieved something he had denied many other people: a cleanly documented case.
At the chapel, his department arranged the flowers in blue and white.
His medals were displayed beside the coffin.
His service photograph showed a younger Mercer staring directly into the camera with the expression of a man waiting for someone else to make a procedural mistake.
Dr. Lila Soren gave the psychological remarks.
She had never treated Mercer. She said that twice, because psychologists understand lawyers.
“I cannot diagnose the deceased,” she began. “I can only discuss a behavioral progression suggested by the records available.”
The police chief shifted in his chair.
Soren continued.
She said the interesting feature was not that an officer accused of unlawful arrests might later have committed murder.
It was that the two behaviors could, psychologically, belong to the same architecture.
“An unlawful arrest,” she said, “can teach a person something very specific. It can teach him that taking control of another human being is possible if the institution accepts his explanation afterward.”
Nobody moved.
“At first, the reward is authority. The person disappears into a cell because you said the correct words.”
The chapel heater clicked.
“Then documentation becomes optional. Memory becomes evidence. Confidence replaces observation. Each successful violation teaches the same lesson: reality is negotiable if your role is respected.”
The former wife stared at the floor.
Soren looked toward the coffin.
“The progression, if there was one, may therefore have been less dramatic than people prefer. He may not have crossed from policeman to murderer in a single psychological leap.”
She paused.
“He may simply have discovered that eventually he no longer needed the jail.”
That was the most useful sentence spoken at the funeral.
It was also the shortest investigation Gray Harbor ever conducted.
Afterward, the deputy chief asked me whether Dr. Soren’s remarks would appear in the permanent crematorium record.
I told him speeches were not ordinarily transcribed.
His shoulders relaxed.
Then I said the chapel audio system retained thirty days automatically.
His shoulders became administrative.
Within forty minutes I received an email from Municipal Legal Affairs.
The subject line was:
RETENTION CLARIFICATION — MERCER SERVICE
The message explained that recordings associated with sensitive personnel matters could be classified as nonessential operational data.
A second email arrived six minutes later.
It instructed me not to delete anything.
A third arrived at 4:12 p.m.
It instructed me not to preserve anything outside ordinary retention procedures.
This is how civilized institutions scream.
Quietly, and in duplicate.
The sealed envelope from Mercer’s coffin remained on my desk.
Inside were a badge, house keys, a cheap black pen, and a folded photocopy.
The photocopy was from a 2012 Holloway & Finch appendix.
One page.
One handwritten annotation.
Supervisor informed. No action pending.
Below it was a date.
Below that, a signature.
The signature belonged to a man currently seated three pews behind Mercer’s coffin.
Deputy Chief Roland Venn.
I looked through the chapel glass.
Venn was speaking with the chief.
He caught me looking.
Then he looked at the envelope.
There are moments when people understand each other without language.
Those moments are terribly inefficient, so institutions usually discourage them.
Venn walked into my office.
“That item,” he said pleasantly, “should have gone to Property.”
“It arrived with the deceased.”
“Then someone made an error.”
“I imagine someone did.”
He smiled.
Mercer had apparently taught his colleagues facial expressions as well.
Venn extended his hand.
I gave him the envelope.
That is the portion of my involvement I would prefer you judge quickly.
Complicity, in Gray Harbor, rarely feels like assisting evil.
Usually it feels like avoiding a meeting.
The cremation occurred at 5:40 p.m.
Officially, Elias Mercer died from gunshot wounds sustained during a residential break-in.
Unofficially, he died from eventually choosing a house whose occupant had both a firearm and excellent documentation.
By the next morning, the department had issued a statement praising Mercer’s years of service while acknowledging “unresolved concerns regarding historical investigative practices.”
Holloway & Finch was not mentioned.
Neither were the missing people.
Neither were the seven children.
Neither was Madame Vale’s seventy.
A records clerk later told me that several Mercer-related archive requests had been consolidated into a single restricted-access case group.
The clerk sounded proud.
Organization is very soothing when the contents are monstrous.
Dr. Soren’s funeral remarks vanished from the chapel server on day twenty-nine.
Not day thirty.
I checked.
Someone had been careful.
I was careful too.
I had written down her sentence about the jail.
Not because I intended to expose anyone.
That would be heroic, and I have spent thirty-two years in municipal funeral service without developing the condition.
I wrote it down because I thought she had identified the mechanism.
Mercer had begun by taking people where they did not belong and trusting the system to justify him afterward.
Years later, according to the darkest allegations, he stopped bringing them back.
The institution did not teach him murder.
It taught him something smaller.
Something more useful.
It taught him how much could disappear behind the correct form.
And after the funeral, Gray Harbor filed Elias Mercer under CLOSED.
This is your future.
About the Creator
Jesse Shelley
Forensic Scientist. Knows where they’re buried, and won’t pretend otherwise... I dissect crimes and noir alike shaped by prompt rituals, investigative obsession, and narrative precision. Every story, a darker truth. Come closer.
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.