Writers logo

I Write to Outlive the Version of Me Who Almost Didn't

On imposter syndrome, the page as witness, and finally understanding who owns the words

By Muhammad SabeelPublished 4 months ago • 9 min read

The first time I almost stopped writing, I was twelve and my mother found the notebook.

It was a spiral-bound thing, the cover soft with use, pages crammed with poems I wrote in the margins of math classes, during the silences after dinner, in the twenty minutes before sleep when the dark felt safe enough to be honest. I had hidden it under my mattress because that was where important things went in the stories I read—treasure maps, diaries, the evidence of selves too fragile for daylight.

My mother was changing the sheets. The notebook fell. She picked it up, and she read it.

Not all of it. I don't think she made it past the third page, the one where I wrote about wanting to disappear into the wallpaper, about feeling like a ghost haunting my own life, about the specific shade of gray that lived behind my ribs and made breathing a negotiation. I was twelve. I didn't have the language for depression yet. I had only the image: a girl becoming wallpaper, becoming silence, becoming the space where a girl used to be.

She sat me down at the kitchen table. The notebook lay between us like a confession I hadn't prepared to make. She was not angry. She was worse. She was worried, and the worry had a shape I recognized even then: the shape of a mother who had not asked for this complexity, who had done everything right, who could not understand why her daughter was manufacturing darkness in a life that contained no obvious wounds.

"You shouldn't write things like this," she said. "Someone might read them. Someone might think you're—" She paused. She couldn't finish the sentence. Unhappy? Unstable? Ungrateful? "You should write happy things. Write about your friends. Write about school. Write something nice."

I nodded. I took the notebook back. I put it in the trash that night, beneath the coffee grounds and the orange peels, and I pressed down until the cover buckled and the spine cracked and the words inside became illegible with moisture and rot. I had learned something important at that kitchen table, something I would spend the next fifteen years trying to unlearn:

Writing was not for me. Writing was for the reader. And the reader was always someone who needed to be protected from the truth of me.

The second time I almost stopped, I was twenty-two and in a creative writing workshop.

The professor was a man who wore tweed in September and quoted Rilke with the casual authority of someone who had never doubted his right to speak. He circled my workshop submission in red ink—not the words themselves, but the subject. A story about a woman who cleaned houses and found the secrets of the families she worked for hidden in the dust: medications in medicine cabinets, letters in dresser drawers, the particular arrangement of objects that revealed whether a marriage was dying or already dead.

"Why does she notice these things?" the professor asked, his pen tapping the page. "Why is she so observant? It feels passive. It feels like she's waiting for something to happen to her rather than making things happen."

I tried to explain that observation was action for someone who had been trained to be invisible, that the power of the overlooked was in the looking back, that the story was about the dignity of noticing when you had been taught to believe you were not worth noticing. He nodded in the way of someone who was not listening, who was already composing his next observation.

"Write what you know," he said, which was what he always said, though what he meant was: write what I recognize. Write what confirms my sense of the world. Write what does not challenge my assumption that the center of every story is someone like me.

I rewrote the story. I made the cleaning woman younger, prettier, more active, more interested in romance than survival. I gave her a love interest, a plot, a trajectory that ended in uplift rather than endurance. The professor praised it. He called it "mature" and "accessible." He did not notice that I had killed the real story in the process, that I had performed a kind of literary euthanasia on the woman who actually lived in my head, who actually cleaned houses, who actually survived by seeing what others missed.

I submitted the revised story to a literary magazine. They rejected it. The note said: "Feels familiar. Lacks urgency."

I threw the draft away. I did not write for eight months.

The third time I almost stopped, I was twenty-nine and the internet had arrived.

I had started a blog by then, a small thing with a handful of readers, mostly other women who wrote in the comments about their own invisibility, their own kitchen tables, their own professors who had mistaken their experience for passivity. I wrote about almost stopping. I wrote about the notebook in the trash, the revised story in the bin, the accumulated weight of almosts that had become, without my noticing, a kind of graveyard of selves I had abandoned to make myself acceptable.

The post went viral. Not wildly viral—this was before virality was a metric, before numbers were the language of worth—but it traveled further than anything I had written. It reached people who needed it. It reached people who wrote to me in emails that arrived at 3 AM, subject lines frantic with the relief of being understood: I thought I was the only one. I thought I was making it up. I thought the problem was me.

And then it reached the others.

The first comment: "This is just navel-gazing. Have you considered that maybe you're not a writer but someone who needs therapy?"

The second: "Another privileged white woman complaining about her feelings. Try being a person of color and then tell me about invisibility."

The third: "Your mother was right. Nobody wants to read this."

The fourth: "Have you ever considered that the reason you feel invisible is because you have nothing worth seeing?"

I read them at my desk, in the apartment I could barely afford, in the job I had taken to pay for the writing I did in the hours before dawn. I read them and I felt the old familiar pull: the trash can, the delete key, the erasure of the self who had dared to believe her words mattered.

I almost stopped. I opened a new document. I typed a single sentence:

I am not writing for you.

Then I closed the laptop. I went to sleep. I did not know, yet, that the sentence would become the foundation of everything that followed.

I did not stop.

I am telling you this because the almosts matter. The almosts are the architecture of the writing life, the load-bearing walls that hold up the structure of everything we eventually become. I did not stop because I realized, slowly, over years, that the question I had been asking was wrong.

I had been asking: Who am I writing for?

The answer I had been given, again and again, was: For your mother. For your professor. For the commenter. For the market. For the reader who needs to be protected, who needs to be pleased, who needs to be confirmed in their sense of the world.

The real question was: Who am I writing to outlive?

And the answer was: The version of me who almost didn't.

I write for the twelve-year-old girl who believed her darkness was a defect, who put her notebook in the trash and learned to speak in the language of orange peels and coffee grounds, of things discarded and decomposed. I write for the twenty-two-year-old who killed her own story to make it palatable, who performed literary euthanasia and called it maturity. I write for the twenty-nine-year-old who read the comments at 3 AM and felt the pull of the delete key like gravity, like fate, like the inevitable end of every story she had ever tried to tell.

I do not write for my mother, who has never read another word of mine and who I have learned to love in the specific, bounded way of people who share blood but not language. I do not write for my professor, who is retired now and whose Rilke quotes I can no longer remember. I do not write for the commenters, who have multiplied and mutated and who I have learned to treat as weather: present, unavoidable, ultimately not about me.

I write for the versions of myself who almost stopped, who almost became wallpaper, who almost believed that the only acceptable story was the one that ended in uplift rather than endurance. I write because they are still in me, still whispering their warnings, still holding up the almosts like evidence in a trial I am still conducting against myself.

And I write for the versions of you who are reading this and recognizing your own almosts. The notebook you burned. The draft you deleted. The sentence you swallowed before it could become a paragraph. I cannot promise you that writing will save you. I cannot promise you that the comments will stop, that the professors will understand, that the kitchen tables will become safe.

I can only promise you this: the page does not judge. The page does not look away. The page is the only witness who has never asked you to be smaller than you are.

Imposter syndrome is not a feeling. It is a structure, a system of rewards and punishments designed to keep certain voices in the margins of their own stories. It tells you that your experience is not universal enough, that your pain is not dramatic enough, that your observation is not active enough, that your survival is not uplifting enough. It tells you that the real writers are somewhere else, doing something else, being someone else.

Imposter syndrome is the voice of every kitchen table, every red pen, every 3 AM comment. It is the accumulated weight of almosts, the graveyard of selves, the belief that writing is for the reader and the reader is always someone who needs to be protected from the truth of you.

The only way I know to survive it is to write directly at it. To name it. To make it the subject rather than the shadow. To say: I am writing this despite you. I am writing this to outlive you. I am writing this because the alternative is the trash can, the delete key, the orange peels and coffee grounds, and I have already been there. I have already done that. I am not going back.

I am not writing for the market. I am not writing for the algorithm. I am not writing for the workshop, the magazine, the grant committee, the tenure board, the approval of people who have never sat with a notebook at 3 AM and wondered if the darkness behind their ribs was a defect or a gift.

I am writing for the girl who almost didn't. I am writing for the woman who almost stopped. I am writing for the version of myself who is still in the trash, still in the bin, still in the almost, and who I am slowly, sentence by sentence, pulling back into the light.

She is not grateful. She is not uplifted. She is not nice.

She is here. She is writing. She is finally, finally, seen.

And if you are reading this, if you are still here, if you have your own almosts and your own graveyard and your own 3 AM pull toward the delete key:

She is writing for you too.

Not because you need to be pleased. Not because you need to be protected. Because you are still here, and that is enough, and the page is waiting, and the darkness behind your ribs is not a defect.

It is the light you have not yet learned to read by.

ProcessAchievementsWriter's BlockAdviceGuides

About the Creator

Muhammad Sabeel

I write not for silence, but for the echo—where mystery lingers, hearts awaken, and every story dares to leave a mark

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Muhammad Sabeel