history
Past politicians, legislation and political movements have changed the course of history in ways both big and small. Welcome to our blast to the past.
The Russian-Ukrainian War: Is there a targeting of oil countries?
History is a great maze; It is a vicious “spring-like” rings of the structure, which proceed in a fixed and supportive system, indefinitely. Accordingly, the events and situations of history are repeated in the same form and content, although the difference is the contrast of eras and times. Since each era has its own priorities and circumstances, the order of events varies. But in the end, the result is the same without any difference.
Zernouh.abdoPublished 2 years ago in The SwampThe problems of the Sisi regime are increasing, and the execution is the solution
Egypt recently witnessed a new round of executions involving seven people in the so-called “Helwan Microbus” case and the “Ajnad Misr” case, which date back to 2014 and 2016. This new batch confirms the general trend of increasing death sentences since 2013 when Abdel Fattah al-Sisi took power through Coup overthrew elected President Mohamed Morsi. Reports by Egyptian and international human rights organizations indicate that hundreds of judgments issued by the courts and executed by the Ministry of Interior departments over the past two years have placed Egypt in the fifth place among the first countries to carry out death sentences, and the third, according to Amnesty International.
Zernouh.abdoPublished 2 years ago in The SwampJoin the Fight for Freedom
Russia-Ukraine war latest: bomb attack on Mariupol art school sheltering 400 – live Russia has rubbished reports suggesting its cosmonauts wore yellow suits with blue accents to show solidarity with Ukraine, the Associated Press reports.
hirusandutyre distributoursPublished 2 years ago in The SwampMarch 26, 1971: Independence Day
Before being capture by Pakistani forces in the early hours of March 26. The Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman sent a telegram to the people declaring Bangladesh 'independent'. EPR's wireless message proclaimed his independence. March 26, 1971: Independence Day.
Sashon khanPublished 2 years ago in The SwampThe role of the USA behind the Russia-Ukraine conflict
The world has been cursing Russia for such a move but hardly anyone is paying attention to the fact that it was the USA that had started all this.
Adarsh Kumar SinghPublished 2 years ago in The SwampFemale Entrepreneurs
That conversation came in the middle of the pandemic, so the first CWI event Shahidi attended happened virtually. “At that time, we weren’t able to meet in person, but we had a wonderful conversation about the importance of diversity and inclusion,” she says. “To be in a partnership where we can have these gatherings—virtually or face to face—is wonderful. We get to celebrate 15 years of supporting women globally through these initiatives while creating moments like the gala. So this is a partnership that fulfills me creatively and touches where my heart is in terms of the mission.”
Md.Nahid HassanPublished 2 years ago in The SwampWhy doubt the Islam of Ertugrul Ghazi?
Why is an individual of a nation that has never been an idolater in its history considered an idolater? The moods of some of my Pakistani siblings are really interesting. His writings, especially when it comes to Turks or the religion of Islam, come in a very pleasant mood and feed them in a way that makes me, as a Turk and a Muslim, bite my finger because sometimes Such statements are made that Subhanahu wa Ta'ala has nothing to do with the history of the Turks from afar. Of course, these friends of mine also give some references but it is a pity that the scope of their studies remains within the scope of Western news agencies which have a long history of hatred towards Turks and Muslims. There are great intellectuals who change the history of Muslims and change the course of events in history by making people who have lived together for a thousand years as mortal enemies of each other, just as Arabs are called Turks, Kurds are called Arabs and Turks are called Afghans. Makes Pakistanis hate and then Syrians hate Iraqis. Just as changing history and portraying Muslims as ignorant, ignorant and savage creatures creates a deadly disease like Islamophobia in the minds of ordinary people in Western countries which seems almost impossible to cure. And despite killing millions of innocent Muslims in the last two decades, Muslims are still terrorists. They cover up their crimes under the guise of international law. No wonder, my surprise starts when our Muslim brothers and sisters start believing in their self-made statements and start preaching that they should have mercy on us. Obviously now my dear friends would like to find out. Why do such things come to Khalil's mind all of a sudden? My friends, the real reason for my sudden start of such a conversation is the incomprehensible storm of debate that has arisen in some quarters of Pakistan due to the famous "Ertugrul Ghazi Drama". This unnecessary series, which is beyond the comprehension of this poor man, has gone so far as to say that Ertugrul Ghazi was also a Muslim. In the era and democracy in Turkey, religious or non-religious, Muslim or non-Muslim has come to anyone's mind. But I don't know why this question came to the mind of my dear Pakistani friends after a drama. Goodbye. When in the battlefield of Ertugrul drama, the companions of anti-Pakistan views jumped the sword in their hands and after reading their writings, it seemed to me that they did not carry the gun of their own political and imaginary case on the shoulder of Ertugrul Ghazi. Has started to run on.
Salman KhanPublished 2 years ago in The SwampWhy War Between Russia & Ukraine 2022
Why War Take Place Between Russia & Ukraine Conflict go on over both the makes and potential arrangements the contention among Ukraine and Russia. We utilize the word 'arrangements' cautiously, on the grounds that there is little possibility for restoring the degree of certainty or the standards that won preceding 2014. In this short end, we set out a portion of the vital discoveries of the book, and seek after their suggestions for what's to come. To start with, this book has contrasted from numerous others in how its might interpret the timetable of the contention. The contention that arose in 2014 had its underlying foundations at the actual start of the post-Cold War time frame, on the grounds that all along, Russia looked to forestall Ukraine's autonomy and, when this was unavoidable, tried to restrict it both as far as power and region. As Angela Stent adroitly calls attention to, 'Each U.S. president beginning around 1992 has come into office accepting that, not at all like his ancestor, he will actually want to fashion and support a new, further developed relationship with Russia… . However each reset has finished in dissatisfaction on both sides'.[1] Similarly, underlying issues subvert endeavors at re-setting Ukrainian-Russian relations; even the most favorable to Russian Ukrainian presidents (Kuchma and Yanukovych) battled to track down a steady convenience with Russia. As far as public personality and strategies, the story starts considerably prior. As section two illustrated, the way to deal with data fighting and the utilization of flighty strategies ('dynamic measures') has profound roots in the Soviet time, regardless of whether the particular strategies of digital fighting enjoy taken benefit of contemporary innovation. The spread of disinformation, audacious lying, 'whataboutism',[2] and designated brutality were all strategies utilized by the Soviet Union, especially in its long-running fight against the Ukrainian autonomy development. As part three showed, Russia's origination of its public personality - including the view that Russians and Ukrainians are one individuals - has sources returning hundreds of years. It is not necessarily the case that tactical clash was unavoidable, or that the occasions of 2013-2014 didn't give both added motivation and a chance for Russia to utilize force. However, it demonstrates that the craving to reconsider the regional plan in Ukraine didn't arise in light of NATO or EU amplification. While those improvements without a doubt were viewed as hazardous to Russian interests, Russian interest in controlling Ukraine originates before them. Looking forward, this understanding has significant ramifications. While the idea of Putin's system discloses the choice to mediate in Ukraine in 2014, the thought that Ukraine is to some extent or completely Russian domain isn't restricted to Putin or to a tight cut of the Russian world class. To the degree that the Russian creation fantasy fixates on occasions in Kievan Rus, and to the degree that the regional development under Catherine the Great is viewed as the reason for NovoRossiya, apparently Russia's regional yearnings in Ukraine have not been fulfilled. The work to advance further dissidence in NovoRossiya in 2014 showed that had the open door existed, a lot bigger cut of Ukrainian region could have gone under the influence of Russian intermediaries. This drives us to a second significant end, which is that pragmatist examination, while it contributes a lot to getting the elements of contention, doesn't yield a reasonable approach suggestion without the assistance of additional presumptions. The most unmistakable pragmatist investigation of the contention, that of Mearsheimer, depends with the understanding that Russia was a cautious power, safeguarding the state of affairs. To the degree that this supposition that is valid, the West's acknowledgment of that the norm may be viewed as the reason for a steady harmony going ahead. Nonetheless, the suspicion that Russia looks for additional update of business as usual is similarly conceivable. Regionally, the NovoRossiya test, dangers against the Baltic States, and proceeding with tension on the bleeding edges in the Donbas show that Russia could take a more area assuming it can do as such. Similarly as not many anticipated that Russia should hold onto Crimea in 2014 in spite of its long record of guaranteeing the domain, we ought to maybe really try to understand about Kiev and Novorossiya truly. Put in an unexpected way, having reexamined somewhat the regional the norm of 1991, will Russia be fulfilled that this the state of affairs actually leaves the western limit of its impact far toward the East of where it was from 1945 to 1989, and leaves Odesa and Kiev outside its ability to do anything about? Leaving to the side whether or not Russia is satisfied regionally, it obviously looks for correction of the standards that Europe and the US assume have supported the security of Europe beginning around 1989, two of which are that states' decisions of institutional affiliations can't be rejected by outsiders and that lines won't be changed by force.[3] Hence, contingent upon whether we accept Russia is or alternately isn't happy with the norm, authenticity directs the West toward inverse systems. In the event that Russia is happy with Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, the West can help its own security by assenting to these additions and in this way making Russia less forceful. In any case, in the event that Russia isn't fulfilled, then, at that point, authenticity, as it generally has done, would advise that power be met with power. The most essential pragmatist contention is that power is a definitive determinant of results, so assuming there is no settlement on the splitting line between Russia's circle and the West, then, at that point, it not set in stone by the utilization or danger of power. In this view, the most ideal way to forestall struggle is to discourage it with the danger of power. Obviously, the West blundered in accepting that Russia could be happy with a Ukraine incorporated into Western organizations. Be that as it may, it stays muddled what Russia would be happy with. Russian pioneers themselves might dissent, and they may not have a proper thought. Similarly as the chance of Ukraine joining NATO was not on the West's radar screen in 1991. Russia's idea of where its circle of interest could end could not set in stone as much by an open door as by some pre-decided thought. However hard as it very well might be to survey expectations looking in reverse (researchers actually differ on what propelled Soviet approach during the Cold War), it will be much harder to evaluate them investigating what's to come. Therefore, we should keep on expecting that arrangement proposals toward the Ukraine-Russia struggle mirror the creators' suppositions as much as any examination that comes from those presumptions. A third end is that the contention won't be not difficult to determine. Rehashed endeavors at truces have not kept going over a day, and a proposition by Ukraine to welcome UN peacekeepers into the Donbas has been hindered by Russia.[4] Russia's own proposition for peacekeepers was dismissed by Ukraine and the US over the key inquiry of where to station them. Ukraine and the US look to have peacekeepers on the globally perceived Russian-Ukrainian line while Russia recommended that they be founded on the truce line. Putin's proposition hence looked like before recommendations during Yeltsin's administration when 'CIS' (read Russian) peacekeepers froze clashes that Russian intermediaries had won on the truce line in the Trans-Dniestr, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Maybe, rather than considering how to determine the contention, we ought to ponder how to oversee it. It is in this regard that the relationship with the Cold War may be generally productive. While conversations on the two sides about winning the Cold War never stopped, over the long run expanding consideration was paid to dealing with the contention to limit its risk going crazy. The contention is probably not going to be settled for two reasons. To start with, the different sides' understandings of the wellsprings of the contention and the satisfactory arrangements stay far separated. Despite the fact that numerous in the West perceive that Russia is very improbable to invert its addition of Crimea, and are ready to acknowledge that, remembering it formally and legitimizing it will be considerably more troublesome. That is considerably more valid for the public authority of Ukraine. Expecting the domain isn't to get back to Ukraine, figuring out how to legitimize Russia's addition will be fundamental for a total goal of the contention, and it doesn't give the idea that numerous in the West or in Ukraine are close to finding that OK, to a limited extent on the grounds that doing as such could start a risky trend. Second, the harm done to different connections can only with significant effort be scattered, regardless of whether there were simply the longing to do as such (and that itself is sketchy). The supposition after 1991 that an amicability of interests had to a great extent supplanted irreconcilable situation in the West's relations with Russia helped smooth over an enormous number of conflicts. Presently, the presumption that the different sides are enemies again sabotages collaboration. Trust is at the very least and dishonesty is broadly expected, subverting the circumstances to try and look for normal interests. Besides, in the US and Russia (and maybe in different nations also), homegrown governmental issues remunerates an ill-disposed position toward the other. Particularly after Russia's impact crusade in the 2016 official political decision, it will be extremely challenging for a US organization to be viewed as making manages Russia. For a significant part of the Cold War, endeavoring to manage Russia prompted allegations of gullibility or 'non-abrasiveness'. Today it is probably going to prompt charges of conspiracy. This expanded degree of aggression implies that regardless of whether an arrangement were handled to perceive another the state of affairs including Russian power over Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, nor Russia's relations with the West nor Ukraine could get back to the prewar condition of certainty, low as that was. Western state run administrations would need to keep on living under the new presumption that tactical activity is presently essential for relations among these nations. The crucial result of Russia's mediation in Crimea and East.
RONO SARKARPublished 2 years ago in The SwampHow Putin Will Go Nuclear By Howard Bloom
We are in a war with one man, Vladimir Putin. And Vladimir Putin is nuclear. Putin has made two kinds of nuclear threats. He has threatened to use nuclear warheads. And he has implicitly threatened us with deliberate disasters at the nuclear reactors he has captured.
Jimmy Stars WorldPublished 2 years ago in The SwampRussian sanctions mean ESA's Mars rover is unlikely to launch in 2022
The European Space Agency (ESA) has said the European-Russian joint deployment to Mars this year is "extremely unlikely" due to sanctions imposed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. On Monday, the European Space Agency said the launch in 2022 was now "absolutely impossible" after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. After Moscow shocked the world last week with a Moscow attack on Ukraine and the EU responded with severe economic sanctions, ESA said "sanctions and the general situation make the 2022 launch less likely." The European Space Agency has said a joint European-Russian Mars campaign planned for this year could be delayed, citing sanctions linked to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and ESA member states.
James maryPublished 2 years ago in The SwampPoland's Difficult Offer: Fighter Jets for Ukraine, but Only Through the Hands of the United States
President Biden's pledge to keep the US out of direct battle with Russian forces was put to the test this week when Poland stunned American officials by volunteering to hand over its collection of aged Russian-made MIG aircraft to Ukraine for eventual transfer.
Torikul IslamPublished 2 years ago in The SwampThe American Do More and the Humanitarian Crisis in Afghanistan
Washington has played a key role in upsetting the balance of power in various parts of the world. For decades, Western nations have continued to exploit the people of Asian and African countries using brand new tactics, but the so-called war on terror that began after 9/11 Took her in his arms. Will the United States now emerge from the biggest economic crisis since World War II under the leadership of Joe Biden? Will all Americans benefit from the new economic policies promised by the President of the United States? With their completion, will the US economy be able to compete with the other major powers of the world? However, only time will tell. This worsening situation has created a power vacuum that Russia and China are already filling. Given the situation after the withdrawal from Afghanistan, where many have While questions are being raised, each country is struggling to adhere to its own policies, which has led to new crises in the region and now things are spiraling out of control. No country knows the US demand, nor does it know what to give in return Is? ۔ Pakistan has always claimed to be an ally of the United States, but whenever cooperation was needed for defense and development, it acted like a parrot. There is no doubt that the direction of our national foreign policy has never been right in the past. ۔ Washington turned down an invitation to pay an official visit to the Soviet Union, although the United States, which claims to be a superpower, has never established relations with us on an equal footing, nor has it upheld its independence and sovereignty in the international community. This is the basic principle of mutual relations. Or that its retreat in the region is part of a greater plan, as it has done in the Middle East before. Former President Obama also left the Syrian arena for Russia despite strong criticism, much to the astonishment of the Syrian opposition, Arab countries and Turkey. India is also playing a key role in adding fuel to the fire so that the "One Belt One Road" project can be implemented. On the other hand, it has never adhered to nuclear non-proliferation treaties in the form of NPT and CTBT. Washington has opened a new front against its allies, China and Russia. Signing new agreements to equip is also a link in the same chain. Under a well-conceived conspiracy, a junior era of political, economic and strategic instability is being ushered in. Hardly any country can protect itself from its severe negative effects. Over the past two decades, India has resorted to US-sponsored terrorism to increase its influence in the region. Not only did he promote sabotage, but in the clashes between the Taliban and Afghan forces he always pretended to play a double game, negotiating with the Taliban on the one hand and his nefarious aims of arming the former Ghani administration against them on the other. Therefore, if any country can be involved in conspiracies to obstruct the "peace process", then it is only Modi who is deeply disturbed by the failure of its expansionist goals. The security and development and prosperity of Pakistan and other countries in the region is not in the eye of the beholder of the government. The hand is not being let go. The aggression of Indian forces on the LOC, the rising incidence of terrorism in Balochistan and FATA has the sole purpose of thwarting the C-Pack project by withdrawing support from Pakistan to the fundamental right of Kashmiris to vote. Washington's nefarious aims And expansionist and belligerent policies for the sake of interests have proved to be a poison for the economy as the so-called war on terror has brought the whole world to the brink of catastrophe. And it is acting as an air bridge, but in view of the dire situation of the war-torn country for two decades, the hunger and poverty of the people and the resurgent human and economic crisis, the United Nations, especially the United States and its allies In the face of the changing situation in the region after the Taliban took over, the eyes of China, Russia, Iran, Turkey and other countries are focused on Pakistan, which appreciates its role in restoring peace in Afghanistan. Ready to cooperate as much as possible.
shakeel ahmadPublished 2 years ago in The Swamp