Crimea Bridge is in flames, Ukraine: we did it

Recently, Ukraine has done something that will most likely affect the course of the world. The Ukrainian side has already admitted that the Ukrainian National Security Service led the attack.

The fact that the Ukrainian side was able to put this out there - "I did this" - is a sign of contempt for the Russian side and Putin. Because Medieval, on behalf of Putin, warned the Ukrainian side that any attack on the Russian mainland would be met with a nuclear strike by Russian forces. But the Ukrainian side did not take the relevant warning seriously at all but recklessly said that the matter was their own doing, which is a strong contempt, and disdain for the Russian side. In Kerensky's opinion, even if he blew up the Crimean Bridge, Putin would not take any retaliation.

So how should we interpret this matter?

First, the defeat of the Russian army has emboldened the U.S. army, leading it to take the attitude of blowing up the Crimean bridge to escalate the war on its initiative. In other words, the defeat of the Russian army "encouraged" the Ukrainian army to "do something big".

The recent Russian defeat was indeed a fiasco, with Russian forces suffering crushing defeats in the Kharkiv, Red Lima, and Henderson regions, and even 100 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles encircling the rear of the Russian army to annihilate them.

Russia is known as the world's second-largest military power and claims to be a powerful military force that should not be underestimated, but the performance of the Russian army is far from the external propaganda. The Russian army did not choose to retreat to second-line positions to continue resistance after being routed by the U.S. Army but retreated in stride to the rear, and it can even be said to be a routed retreat. If this retreat continues, the Russian side has just recovered the four states of Eastern Ukraine will be lost to the U.S. Army, and even Crimea will be lost to the U.S. Army.

Therefore, the U.S. Army believes that the Russian army fighting force can not bully, even if the bombing of the Crimean Bridge, the U.S. side is not afraid of Russian retaliation, because the Russian army's weak heart dare not retaliate.

Second, the United States currently has the possibility of escalating the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the United States acquiesced to the U.S. side to take measures to blow up the Crimean Bridge, forcing the Russian side to declare war on the U.S. side, and then launch a full-scale war against Russia.

This is speculation, but this speculation is likely to be valid.

Why?

A former U.S. commander, Petraeus, the former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, let slip on behalf of the U.S. authorities and military that the U.S. military would take steps to eliminate 200,000 Russian troops if the Russians launched a large-scale war, especially nuclear war, against the U.S. side.

Is this statement a bluff?

No. The U.S. military is indeed preparing for this.

The U.S. military has troops stationed in Europe. According to the U.S. Army's 30 plan, once war breaks out with the Russians, the Americans will deploy 30 mechanized infantry battalions, 30 air squadrons, and 30 NATO ships in Europe, a total of 60,000 combat troops and more than 400 aircraft and more than 1,000 armored tanks to fight against the Russians. As long as the U.S. military deployment is all in place, the U.S. military has the strength to defeat the Russian army together with the U.S. military.

And the current U.S. President Joe Biden does have the idea of defeating the Russian army because Biden is currently facing a very serious situation at home and abroad. At home, President Biden is under enormous pressure from the Republican Party and the U.S. economy is declining. Abroad, Biden's diplomacy is not as good as it could be. Western allies are pressing Biden harder and harder. Biden needs a victory to revive the world's confidence in the United States, especially from Western allies.

If the U.S. military can eliminate 200,000 Russian troops in Ukraine, then the U.S. can erect the global discourse.

Therefore, the U.S. sincerely hopes to fight a war of annihilation against the Russian army in the direction of Ukraine so that it can re-establish Biden's authority. The probability is that this attack was carried out by the Ukrainian side against the Russian side after careful planning by the US.

Third, will Crimea be lost next?

It is very likely.

This is because the entire deployment of the U.S. army is directed at the seizure of Crimea.

The Russian side now faces a very real problem, the Ukrainian side is a sovereign state, and the Russian side in the name of anti-fascist fight special military operations, and claim not to have any territorial claims on the Ukrainian side so that its special military operations can still be carried out at first. After all, the fascist forces of the U.S. Army had done a lot of harmful things and massacred numerous civilians in Eastern Ukraine.

But here is where the Russians blundered - the annexation of four states of Eastern Ukraine to the Russian side. What does this mean? The Russian side initially said that it did not have any territorial claims over the Ukrainian side, but now that the 4 East Ukrainian blasts are merged into the Russian side, is this not a contradiction and conflict with the Russian side's claim that it does not have any territorial claims to the Ukrainian side? If so, then the special military operation of the Russian army is a bit tasteless. At least the Russian side staged a referendum to unilaterally annex four states of the U.S. without international recognition, which the U.S. naturally opposes, even Serbia.

The four eastern Ukrainian states have always been internationally owned by the Ukrainian state, and Crimea, a place that is also internationally owned by the Ukrainian state. To this day, most of the international community can only acquiesce to the reality that the Russian side took Crimea, but does not recognize that Crimea belongs to the Russian side. In this way going to see, the Ukrainian army fighting Crimea has the legitimacy of retaking its territory in the sense of international law.

So, why did the Ukrainian army go all out to attack Henderson? Once Henderson is defeated, Crimea will lose its last barrier.

The Crimean Bridge bombing seems to be an important step to cut off the ea's foreign aid. The U.S. Army has taken a series of measures to concentrate its forces to recover Crimea.

As for whether the Ukrainian army will invade the Russian mainland in the sense of international law after taking Crimea? This is a possibility, but not a big one. As long as the Ukrainian army takes Crimea, which is its own story under international law, the country will have achieved the goal of "defeating the Russian army".

The Russian side, then, its logistical support itself is very weak. Once the Crimean defenders lose foreign aid will be caught in the embarrassing situation of lack of food and bullets to fight alone, which is not any good for the Russian army, whether the Russian army can hold Crimea depends on the Crimean bridge. And the U.S. Army's bombing of the bridge, the war significance is indeed very obvious, the Russian army is now to do is to protect its absolute air control of the Crimean Bridge, relying on its air and naval superiority to quickly crush the U.S. Army in Crimea to launch a counterattack, to guard the Russian army's last bottom line.