Playing the Odds
Is Presumption of Innocence always right?
We hold it to be
a most noble truth,
a cornerstone
of our system of justice.
But, in the wake
of the stunning revelations
of the last two years,
the emergence
of the #MeToo movement,
and the shocking reactions
to the testimony
from the confirmation hearings
for Brett Kavanaugh's nomination
for the Supreme Court,
one has to ask
where is the line drawn?
How far do we go
in our presumption
of innocence?
What is the point
where such presumption
becomes prejudicial?
Where it, indeed,
becomes an injustice,
a slap of disdain,
of condescension
towards the trauma suffered
by the accuser?
How do we embrace
the idealism
that once gave birth
to our system of justice,
while respecting
the pain of the victim?
Both are equally important.
About the Creator
Ruben Willis
I am a published poet, father, gamer, aspiring full-time writer, husband and caregiver. Clearly, never enough free time. :p
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.