Scientific Original Research Article Writing and Editing Support

Our experienced medical writers help to write original research article scientific papers /articles that are publishable in peer-reviewed journals. At Pubrica, we provide end-to-end support from topic selection or research area identification to writing to statistical analyses and publication support.

Literature review forms the nucleus of all scientific research. As a systematic investigation to reach new conclusions and establish facts, every original research article scientific research builds on existing knowledge. Unless one wants to reinvent the wheel, precise awareness on the extent of wisdom on a subject is necessary to carry on research that adds value to the field.

The scientifically relevant literature in a field consists of the previous studies in the area, established schools of thoughts, scholarly original research article, and scientific journals among other things. The literature review varies from field to field. In hard sciences, the literature is mostly facts and the review may be simply a summary of the critical sources. While in soft sciences, the survey provides an overview and synthesis of various schools of thoughts and their interconnection. A summary or an overview is the brief account of all informational highlights from key sources, while synthesis is the restructuring or reorganization of the information in a way that informs the dissertation’s plan of investigating the original research article problem.

The literature review also validates the study by providing information on its relevance and coherency to the existing knowledge and methods in original research article. In turn, it establishes the author’s expertise in the field and provides legitimacy to carry forward the wisdom of the area using scientific and systematic methods.

Injects objectivity into scientific manuscripts:

The primary reason for using passive verbs in scientific manuscripts is due to the act that it injects objectivity into an original research article paper. Scientific objectivity is a characteristic of scientific claims, methods, and its results. It expresses their ideas should not be influenced by relevant factors which include among others:

Particular perspective

Value commitments

Community bias

Personal interests

Using passive voice will avoid using the first person by replacing them with the pronouns like ‘I’, ‘we’, ‘me’, ‘us’, ‘my’ or ‘our’. In other words, in passive sentences, the authors of manuscripts feel that they do not have to identify the one doing the action.

But in reality, scientific objectivity has got nothing to do with passive verbs. It is because passive verbs have nothing to do with pronoun usage. Besides, authors had noted several potential shortcomings of passive-voice writing, including uncertainty about the agent (1) change of meaning (2), stilted language (3).

It has been found by experiment that …

I do not accept the idea ≠ the idea cannot be accepted

It is strongly considered that …. (instead of ‘I firmly belied/consider that….’)

Even active sentences like passive sentences can be written in the first person. It is also true that active verbs need not use the first person.

Clinical research is the backbone of public health. Summarizing the findings in the form of a research article is the last and most important step in clinical original research article. It is the ethical and moral duty of researchers to provide accurate and clear information about the research. This is relevant as it not only communicates the essence of the research conducted but also provides direction for future research.

With the increase in the number of journals, digital and print options, the number of options for publications has increased exponentially over the last few decades. Yet only a small fraction of written find their way into publications.This is because few of us are taught how to write a original research article, how to document the findings, how to summarize statistical findings in the form of tables and graphs, how to derive conclusions,What are the ethical issues involved, how to choose the appropriate Journal and how to communicate during the process of publication. Scientific medical writing services do exactly this and provide appropriate medical writing help to ensure publication in the desired Journal.

A good introduction should have the scientific background and provide the build-up to the study.It should begin by explaining how the issue under study is of public health interest. It should provide a good summary of all scientific literature that is relevant to the current original research article study starting from the already established outcomes to the arena of the unknown. It should finally define the study objectives clearly and provide justification for the research project.

In a logical and chronological fashion, the study methodology should be described with respect to the study setting, the participants, the sample size and distribution, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study design and type of study, interventions are undertaken and statistical methods used for summarizing and analyzing the data. Ethical issues, including regulatory approvals and consent, should be clearly defined. Information provided should be accurate, complete, and concise.

This section discusses the meaning of the study outcomes and compares them with the outcomes of other similar original research article studies. The structure of this section includes the presentation of the primary findings followed by comparison with previous studies and assessing the strengths and limitations of the study. Gray areas of the study are highlighted mentioning requirements for further research and suggest a methodology for the same.

Conclusions

This section is optional original research article, and content should be supported by the study findings.