Unleashing the Power of Revenge Andrew Tate's Big Payback

Unleashing the Power of Revenge Andrew Tate's Big Payback Watch Full Video Exclusive .

Vice's Hit Piece.

I allowed Vice News to do a piece on me in the war room about seven months ago, knowing it would likely be a hit piece. Despite this, I thought that anyone with a brain would see the beauty of the work and want to join. After the interview, I was also interviewed by Piers Morgan, who came at me hard. While the comments were negative, the truth is that everyone actually loves me, and I knew that Vice's hit piece wouldn't work out well for them. After I went to jail, Vice released their hit piece, which was poorly received and largely ignored. They even falsely edited me stuttering to try and make me look bad. As a result, Vice had to turn off the comments section because they were being insulted. However, they later called me and said they wanted to do a fair piece of journalism and undo the hit piece they had done before.

Vice begs for interview

After releasing the damaging article, their reputation was severely impacted, and Vice, which used to be a reputable source, lost its credibility. The Matrix-like propaganda was ignored, and nobody cared about them anymore. However, after being released from jail, the speaker received numerous requests for an interview from Matt at Vice. He called him repeatedly, begging for an interview. Being a nice person, the speaker has agreed to speak with Vice news today, and he has messaged Matt.

The speaker sarcastically said that he gave Matt an instruction like a little dog. They are waiting for Matt's call to discuss Vice's dishonesty and lack of journalistic ethics. When Matt calls, they will hear his perspective on the matter. MacAndrew greets the speaker, congratulates him on being released under house arrest, and asks about his plans for the future.

The speaker believes that they are one of God's chosen ones, and their mission is to spread a positive message and combat degeneracy caused by organizations like Vice, drugs, and pornography. They want to lead people to the truth and the light to create a better society. They think that the hit piece against them failed because it lacked credibility, and mainstream media is controlled by Matrix mechanisms.

The speaker questions why Matt wants to interview them for BBC when he portrayed them as a bad person in his previous video. Matt tries to explain that he tries to report both sides of the story, including the speaker's side.

He also mentions that it was challenging to interview the speaker while they were in jail. The speaker responds that they have unlimited offers from more successful and better journalists than Matt, and they are not sure why they would choose him. Well, you know, Matt, I appreciate your interest in interviewing me, but I have to be honest with you. I have unlimited offers from reporters all over the world, and I'm not sure why I would choose you. I mean, let's be real here, you would be doing me a favor by interviewing me, not the other way around.

And while we do have a history, it's not necessarily a good one. You did some dishonest journalism on me, and there are still unanswered questions that I want to put to you. But ultimately, it is my choice, and I get to choose which reporter gets to become relevant by proxy. As for filming and recording the interview myself, that's definitely something I would consider, but it would depend on the terms of the interview and the outlet it would be broadcasted on.

So, you're suggesting that you won't be able to edit in stutters like what you did with Vice, right? That's why you want to film it yourself?"

"I don't have much knowledge about the algorithms that make people famous or viral on social media platforms. I don't even have most of these apps on my phone. I cannot control what others do or say about me online, and I wouldn't try to either. As for the Romanian police investigation, I'm not sure where you got that information from or who said it. Maybe there is a procedure that needs to be completed, and I'm not aware of it. There has been a lot of misinformation going around."

"Let's be truthful with each other. We have a history, and we're now friends. You edited the startup video to make it look like I was struggling to answer your absurd questions, which is impossible. You might be referring to cutting to b-roll shots of my face when editing the interview, which is understandable, given that we spoke for almost an hour. However, I agree that you edited the video in a misleading manner."

"I wouldn't say that we dishonestly edited it. It wouldn't make sense to release an unedited hour-long interview when we're making a 45-minute documentary. But the point is that I can't stop you from filming the interview yourself."

“In your own home, you have the freedom to release whatever content you want and edit it however you want. I cannot prevent you from doing that. If you choose to do so, and people accuse me of unfair editing, you can provide them with the full unedited version. I appreciate that you want to film our interview to protect yourself from dishonest journalism. I will consider it, but ultimately, I am the one who matters here. I can sit down with anyone and make it the most viewed podcast or interview in the world. If you promise to bring me a box of chocolates, I can bring you a box of chocolates too. It might increase your chances, and I will give you an answer within 24 hours. But please don't lie to me, and check with your superiors if you are allowed to send a box of chocolates. Let me know, and if you can, I will consider giving you the opportunity to speak with me. Are you asking all journalists to bring you a box of chocolates? Let me know about the chocolates, and have a nice day.”

Hello Max, I can bring you a box of chocolates.

Great. Here we are. I went to jail, and everyone thought my life was over. They said I'm going to jail, but it turns out I was totally innocent, and now I'm free. Even better, I get chocolates from Vice and the BBC. Life's looking good.

When works for you? How soon can you get the chocolates? I'm pretty hungry.

Assuming the chocolates are ready, what day is it today? Tuesday? Yeah. Friday, Saturday, something like that, depending on who you're going to come with. I just talked to my lawyer about my house arrest. If I need to get permission to visit you, my lawyer can handle all that. How many of you are coming?

It will just be three people, not me, and two crew.

Okay, let me talk to my lawyer, and I'll get back to you. Hopefully, all right.

Several days later, Matt calls Max.

"Hey, Max, this is Matt. I'm with the BBC. I'm gonna let him know. Okay, be right back. Okay, good morning. Any more breakfast? Yeah, I'll have breakfast. So I got a very important interview today with a renowned esteemed well-known journalist called Matt Shea. Yeah, as you can see, I'm dressed for the occasion. I think you can see. I'm gonna stand outside my house right there, this building, crew for this film crew. That's interesting. Where is he? There he is. Please, can I have another interview? Please?"

[Laughter] "What a dork. Imagine going to school as a kid, okay, and everyone's like, 'You're a geek, you're a nerd, okay, you're a dork.' And then you grow up. That's not Shea's reality. All right, what's one of his interviews about a drug in Colombia, and he was significantly cocaine in the interview talking about how the drug people aren't actually that bad, they're the same as the cocaine people. But then he does hit pieces on good people. He is a dork, a nerd, and a geek. Dng. He's dng.

I haven't seen a dng in person, and you know what's amazing? Well, his stupid ass didn't do what me and you would have done, jump on a Jack and fly somewhere. No, he went to the airport, checked in with their economy, put all his bags on the thing, and then waited in line for security. And he went through all that [ __ ] at 4 am this morning to come here and stand outside my house like a [ __ ]."

The speaker is discussing an upcoming interview with a person of influence, possibly a celebrity or public figure. They mention their annual salary and the cost of something, but the details are unclear. The speaker is interrupted by someone who is waiting for the interviewee, and they express annoyance at having to wait.

The interviewee is described as the most famous and influential person in the world, who owns the culture and is going to save the planet. The speaker seems to be affiliated with Vice, and they mention a previous interview that was honest. The interviewee is described as tired and having breakfast, and there is concern that they may not follow through with the interview. The speaker suggests asking if the interviewee is scared to talk to them, as a tactic to get them to come out. The interviewee eventually agrees to the interview, but demands chocolate before proceeding.