Geeks logo

There's Something Wrong With Cherry (2021)

Partial review, partial opinionated commentary. Join me as I take a bite out of Tom Holland's Cherry.

By Julie Gray - Now Showing NZPublished 3 years ago 3 min read
1
Original Image Via The Movie Database

This article features spoilers for Cherry.

Based on a not so true story. So let's begin there. For those of you who don't know what Cherry is or for any non-cinephile types who might be Tom Holland fans, Cherry is a semi-biographical film adaptation of a book written by Nico Walker. Please pay special attention to the words "semi-autobiographical". Can anything in life be half a lie? Half-truths? That doesn't sound anywhere near as "gripping" as semi-biographical, but it's still only partially the truth. This critique of Cherry sits comfortably somewhere between Tom Holland’s finest work and the worst movie he’s ever been attached to.

Critics the world over are “umming” and “arring” about Tom Holland and his latest movie release, Cherry. If you’re a film fan that loves ratings, you’ll be surprised to see just how different the ratings are across the board for this film. Audiences seemed to enjoy it a whole lot more than the critics. Perhaps that’s a sign some critics are, well, too critical?

Let’s start with the obvious elephants in the room. Yes, there is a lot of drug use, and Tom Holland gives himself a handjob. There is also a fine line between “this will be great for your career” and “well, that could have been better”. Why is it so difficult for writers and directors to express satire and dark comedy in a way that supports the narrative of the story?

If the Rotten Tomatoes ratings are anything to go by, the audiences are loving Tom Holland in a semi-serious movie role. The critics, however, not so much. They think this film misses the mark with its target audience completely, and it’s just too pretentious. It is kind of like someone is trying way too hard to sell this actor and this film to the critics who will rate it on Rotten Tomatoes, you know, where it matters.

But hey, that’s okay. Because Tom has grown as an actor due to this experience and he was well and truly 120 per cent devoted to this role. He wanted to bring it to screen and do the best job he could to tell this person’s story to someone or anyone who cared. We haven’t yet scoured the internet for Nico Walker’s thoughts on the film. We’re guessing that Nico Walker probably didn’t like what was done with his semi-truthful life story.

Tom Holland in "Cherry" (Image Credit TMDb)

So to clarify for anyone that doesn’t know why Tom Holland is doing all of these screwed-up things, he is portraying a real person named Cherry in the film but loosely based on the semi-autobiographical book by Nico Walker. Wikipedia refers to the book as “semi-autobiographical”, which means some of it happened, and some of it didn’t, and they’re not going to tell you what is and isn’t true. Nico Walker is the only one in the know about that.

But does it really matter if the story is true or not? Yes, it does. Because some people will judge “true stories” a lot harsher than fiction, and they probably won’t take too kindly to anyone making a movie about the horrors of war and drug addiction with a satirical narrative that doesn’t work. And that is where Cherry really falls over like… entirely on its face.

Does your audience want to hear your lead actor poke fun at his own tragic existence? Perhaps that is the opposite of what the Russo’s and the writers were trying to achieve? Maybe the fans got it wrong, and the critics all got it right? Maybe it’s just crappy filmmaking and even poorer writing? As for Tom Holland, we think he carried himself well in this film. He didn’t seem or come across as fake in anything he did, and becoming a drug-addicted felon with suicidal thoughts is not an easy stretch for most actors, let alone someone in their 20s. Tom Holland did alright. Look elsewhere, please. The writing? The direction? The direction by the Russo brothers has come under heavy fire by some critics.

We’re putting a nice, big tick in the box next to Tom Hollands acting, but we’re not supporting any other part of this film because it’s way too senseless. If you want to watch actors mock tragic circumstances with a story that makes sense, we recommend Trainspotting.

Originally reviewed by Julie Gray for Now Showing NZ

If you enjoyed reading this article, why not like, share or donate because it's nice to support your fellow writers!

You can check out my other Vocal articles right here.

Twitter - Instagram - Blog - Letterboxd.

movie
1

About the Creator

Julie Gray - Now Showing NZ

I'm that geek that always tries to fit star wars or movies into the conversation. Pop Culture Writer.Cinephile.Star Wars Addicted.

https://linktr.ee/NowShowingNZ

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.