Why is Stephen Hawking against the existence of God? Stephen Hawking: Unless mankind accepts that God is a cold formula!

Does the study of theology mean that they believe in the existence of God? Instead of discussing it here, what I want to talk about today is why Hawking is so strongly against the existence of God. So without the existence of God, how does Hawking explain how the universe came to be?

Many people believe to have asked the question, since the universe was created by God, then who created God? This is an infinite loop of dead ends! So are humans created by God? Does it negate the power of God to say that other animals are animals and humans are higher animals distinct from them, or humans alone?

When the scientific system was not perfect, man believed in the existence of God, usually in the form of religion, with Nuwa kneading clay in the East and Jehovah, God, kneading the clay to make Adam in the West! But this all requires an explanation of how God and Nuwa came to be, and the only explanation is that they predate the existence of the universe and the existence of the world.

So look at how physicist Stephen Hawking refutes the existence of God! In 2010, the British newspaper The Times ran a front-page story with a famous painting of Michelangelo creating Adam, with the headline, Hawking says God did not create the universe, and says a famous Hawking point that modern physics leaves no place for God in the birth of the universe, as a critique of Hawking's God theory's disdain, as it was in the run-up to the Pope's visit to England.

In response, Hawking explained that his research into the origin of the universe was not really about proving or disproving the existence of God, but about finding a rational framework to explain the creation of our universe and to justify it scientifically. So how did Hawking explain himself? This process involves the knowledge of recent physics and astronomy, from Hubble's redshift to Einstein's general theory of relativity, to the Big Bang theory, and cosmic microwave background radiation, and so on. I believe that these readers familiar with physics and astronomy to listen to the ears are calloused, here no longer repeat! Directly talking about Hawking's explanation.

Hawking believes that the universe from nothing to something, the Big Bang the initial mass of energy or from nothing, that piece of energy or positive energy, corresponding to the universe somewhere there must be negative energy. Just like you pile sand on the beach, the pile of sand pile is positive energy, and digging the hole is equivalent to negative energy. At this point, it solves the source of energy of the Big Bang.

Another will need to solve the problem of time, God created man, who created God, created God must be earlier than the creation of man. Where does time come from? The answer is that time was created at the big bang, and when was the universe created, also the big bang, meaning that there was no time before the big bang, so there is no need to explain how God was created at an earlier time.

Explaining time that did not exist before the big bang can also be explained by black holes! Einstein believed that black holes can distort time, the closer the black hole the slower the flow of time, when entering the interior of the black hole vision, time also stopped, stopped is the same as time does not exist!

So Hawking used the entire knowledge of physics to tell that creating the universe does not require God, the only thing needed is the knowledge of nature and the laws of the universe, the laws of science, and mathematical formulas! So would you like God to be these cold formulas? This incumbent goes against the will of the people, therefore God does not exist! The universe was born from nothing!