Moral Pitfalls of the False 'Outsider'

The ongoing debate between Science and God has led some such as myself to resolve the issue, at least for now, with the slogan: "Science Is God".

A couple of revelations have informed my particular conversion to this theory. First, the fact that the computer language "Unicode" seems also to be the language by which the human mind works. Theoretically, then, a satellite transmission to your cellphone could also be fully registered in your human brain.

Even worse, since human ideations of our senses such as hearing and location are all based on different parts of our brain being activated, it is quite possible that the cell phone itself is nothing more than a prop: The signal from the cell phone tower is understood directly by the human brain, and the location of the sound is an illusion created by the Unicode.

When the scientific community notices advanced functionality in particular individuals or groups of individuals, the concept itself is a media illusion. TV News announces the threat of a new alien form that walks on two feet. Everyone has to agree that this type of life form could some day destroy the plant.

Politicians are suddenly shown on television crawling on their hands and feet, either at grassroots town hall meetings, or at corporate fundraising dinners.

A few individuals, usually the economically unfortunate, did not view the Breaking News Alert of this treat, and continue walking on two legs.

They are the ones picked up either by Federal Prosecutors, Covid19 testers, or by Church Missionaries, to be evaluated for behavioral, health or spiritual problems.

The true problem, is in fact based on the union of infants and similarly situated grandparents who are trying to understand how to walk on their own two feet.

As bipeds, the rest of us must either accept this as a fundamental reality of our world, or rebel, in the hopes of developing an altogether new society.

The sick truth is that the whole process, either by the name of biblical revelation or scientific discovery, does in fact seem to lead to progress in human evolution.

The perpetrators of this media falsehood always leave a few clues of their system. Those who believe that God (in this case Science itself) is "Good" tend to try to do their best to contribute to society within its existing structure. However this implies a fixed structure to earth life, which is more of a "Bible" answer. Those who focus not on the fixed nature of the structure of earth life, but on the advancements of civilisations, tend to prefer the argument for "Science"

Once such clue supporting this article comes from my study today on the question of whether humans are a "Carbon-Based" life form, or a "Water-based" life form. The current answer is that Carbon is the main component of of the "dry matter" of human life, and that water is the primary "solvent".

Yet, I discovered a hint: the world which "Science" wants to study more: what they now call the "shadow biosphere":

Why would this term "Shadow Biosphere" be added to the lexicon? because death is always our fear, causing "anxiety" which is resolved through scientific study and advances. Here, we find it comforting, with the possibility of Global Warming, that water may someday dry up from our planet, that some "solvent" other than water might someday become part of earthlife: perhaps nothing more complicated than the jellyfish.

So, while we know of the jellyfish, science still describes this "solvent replacement" as "hypothetical":

Rebelliouis young people, fighting for rights within their household, might start all sorts of conspiracy theories. Lawyers ,ight see this as a "smoking gun". Simple country media creators such as myself just hope to make a few pennies from online articles, to ease everyone's concerns.