Andrew Tate VS Psychologist

Recently, Entity released an interview with a psychiatrist who tweeted about their therapy session with Angel Tate. This interview with Andrew Take was particularly intriguing as they addressed various questions and the psychiatrist posed some thought-provoking inquiries. It was a truly captivating experience. If you want to learn more about Angel Tate's real-world experiences at university, you can find a link in the description. Reading about it could potentially be life-changing. Remember to like the video, subscribe, and turn on notifications to stay updated. Take a moment to watch this remarkable interview that has the potential to break the internet. Now, let's dive into the conversation. How can we make this impactful and truly break the internet? I'm curious about your thoughts on this. It's evident that many people are interested in my journey and what it feels like to go through what I'm experiencing. Some individuals are living vicariously through me, cheering me on without truly caring about the situation. Breaking the internet may have already been accomplished, but with your unique insights and our combined efforts, we can reach an even larger audience. Speaking of interests, I would like to ask why you wanted to have this conversation with me. I understand that you are a psychotherapist, and I have my reservations about psychotherapy. Despite that, we had a prior conversation that many have deemed my most intriguing podcast ever. It deviated from the expected topics and delved into my mental state post-jail, a subject that has piqued the curiosity of many. Hence, I thought it would be an engaging discussion. Does it concern you that there may be aspects of myself that I am unaware of, which you might try to uncover? I firmly believe that I am fully aware of everything that matters about myself, enabling me to compete effectively. While there may be unknowns, I'm not particularly interested in discovering them if they are not essential. What is useful holds greater importance than what is true. Indeed, I have developed a framework for understanding myself and reality that has proven to be immensely effective. Aligning my thoughts, beliefs, and words with what is beneficial and conducive to winning allows me to shape my own reality. Why else would I adopt a mindset if it doesn't contribute to my competitiveness and success? I am deliberate in creating the software that runs in my mind. It is not a result of my upbringing or the programming I received from my parents at a young age. While it is true that we are all influenced to some extent by our environment, whether it be society, media, peers, or religion, I have taken the time to thoroughly analyze why I hold certain beliefs. I believe this is something that most people fail to do.

I am aware of the origin of the teachings I received, whether they were well-intentioned or not. I have put great effort into analyzing my mindset and ensuring that it benefits me entirely. I do not subscribe to beliefs that diminish my power; I prefer to consider them unreal. Some may argue endlessly that these beliefs are real, but in my world, within my own mind, they hold no truth. Even if I were thrown into a dismal situation, such as a Romanian dungeon, the idea of becoming a depressed individual does not align with the framework of my mind. While I may feel a bit down or sad at times, true depression is not something I can experience. These are distinct emotions. This mindset I have adopted allows me to be competitive. In my personal belief, life is highly competitive, and one's mental software should be tailored to maximize competitiveness. I do not entertain any other beliefs. I have strived to ensure that all my perspectives, experiences, and everything else are aimed towards making me a formidable competitor in all aspects of human life. Have there been instances where your convictions were challenged in recent times? People often challenge me, but what many fail to understand is that I will never adopt the thinking of someone who is sad or less competitive or successful than myself. If someone comes along and tells me that I am wrong and that my perception of the world is incorrect, but they themselves are suffering, why would I accept anything they say? It's interesting when I discuss depression because there are countless individuals who defend it, claiming it to be a very real and devastating experience. They talk about how their life is ruined and that they want to end it all. I find it ironic that they defend and uphold something that has destroyed their existence. If depression is truly as terrible as they claim, they should be open to hearing me say that it isn't real. Instead, they defend it vehemently. This is the first point regarding whether my convictions have been challenged. It's quite astounding. Perhaps it's merely a matter of semantics. Maybe it's as simple as saying, "I feel a little bit depressed today, but I am not a depressed person, and I cannot become depressed." Perhaps by acknowledging this, I understand that it is a temporary state of mind that I can alter and influence. I have never struggled with long-term depression or persistent negative thoughts because I do not believe in that mental construct. I perceive the mind as software, programmed with boundaries and limitations, similar to the concept of a video game or the Matrix. I do not think it is possible for my mind to be permanently trapped in negativity. I don't believe in it, so it just doesn't happen.