Earth logo

Will humanity perish if only children under a year old are left?

Will humanity perish with only children under a year old?

By VickyPublished 2 years ago 6 min read

Friends who say that there are only children under 1 year old and that human civilization will not go extinct have no idea how "stupid" human babies are.

I don’t know if you have thought about a question, that is why human babies can’t do anything when they are born, while animals in nature can learn skills such as walking and eating alone at birth or in a short period of time?

Why do human babies need to be around 12 months old to gradually master walking? Some babies don't even learn.

Compared with the illusory alien theory, I think the theory that "human beings are all premature babies" is more reliable.

Millions of years ago, with the formation of the Great Rift Valley in East Africa, grasslands replaced dense forests, and forest ancient apes had to move to the plains to live. Under the strong pressure of various beasts, ancient apes began to evolve.

During the evolution from ancient apes to Homo sapiens, the way of walking was changed from four limbs to two legs, which means that the hands were freed.

However, the problem comes again. During the evolution of freeing hands, a large number of parts of the body will change, and the size and width of the pelvis is one of them, which is also the direct reason why humans are premature babies.

The large pelvis makes the primitive man walk very uncoordinated, which is equivalent to weakening the comprehensive combat power of the primitive man in disguise.

So slowly, the width of the pelvis of primitive people began to shrink, and finally gradually adapted to the physical characteristics of upright walking. At this time, a new crisis of genocide appeared.

We assume that when walking on all fours, female ancient apes had a pelvic width of A, and they could easily produce offspring.

However, when the primitive man walked upright, in order to adapt to the new physical characteristics, the width of the pelvis was reduced to 1/2A, but the size of the brain bones of the offspring remained unchanged, so there was a problem of "difficult childbirth".

A large number of pregnant women and babies died because of this, so the primitive people either went extinct or changed their strategies.

Until one day, a pregnant woman gave birth to offspring successfully at the age of 10 months. Because the bones are still small, they can also pass through the narrow birth canal. What surprised them even more was that the bones of infants and young children were just born when they were born. , still slightly soft, and over time, the bones of infants and young children will actually become harder and harder, up to a certain threshold.

For mothers, in order to protect the lives of themselves and their children, they must let their children be born early.

For babies, although early birth improves the survival rate, it also interrupts the development of infants and young children in the mother's womb. Therefore, compared with other animals that walk and eat grass when they are born, human infants and young children appear "stupid" A lot, nothing but crying.

Until the age of 1, human infants and young children gradually learn to walk, say some simple words such as "Mom and Dad", but still can't eat independently, which is an Achilles' heel in nature.

Speaking of which, some friends may have objections, then think about it carefully, whether there is a problem of "difficult childbirth" for creatures on earth other than humans.

In addition, the problem of female dystocia does not only occur in ancient times. Taking ancient history as an example, is there a real case of a pregnant woman dying of dystocia?

The problem of female dystocia has been going on for millions of years, and it was not until the emergence of modern caesarean section that the problem of dystocia was solved from the root cause.

Among the many explanations for why human babies are so "stupid", it is the most credible statement that humans are premature babies.

So let's take a look at this time. If there are only children under one year old in the world, will human civilization perish?

Before that, I checked the answers given by a large number of experts on the Internet. One-year-old children are still relatively "stupid", and a small number of them can learn to stand and walk on their own. "Find, process, eat food" is still blank.

Closer to home, we assume that humans over 1 year old disappear in an instant, and human civilization only has babies 1 year old and below, then what will happen?

First of all, no one is hoeing the weeds. It won't take long for the weeds to grow at the door of the house, and then a large number of insects will be attracted to inhabit. When there are more insects, animals that eat insects will also follow. Such as birds, omnivorous mice, etc.

As soon as there are more mice, snakes will also appear, and soon all kinds of animals will enter the human city. Obviously, the 1-year-old baby does not have the ability to manage greening, and will not have the thinking of eliminating animals, so the city will be very busy. Soon to be "engulfed" by nature.

At that time, all kinds of snakes, insects, rats and ants will no longer be satisfied with the dirty underground environment, and they will enter human houses. In addition, aggressive carnivorous creatures such as wolves, lynxes, tigers, leopards, etc., will also seize human houses. as a nest.

Once a 1-year-old baby encounters these carnivores, it has no ability to parry or escape, and the mortality rate is almost 100%.

Some people may say that carnivores exist at the top of the food chain, with a small number of groups and a large number of human babies. It is impossible to meet carnivorous creatures 100%.

What about poison?

Rats are ubiquitous in human cities, and snakes will naturally follow. As long as a human baby is bitten by a poisonous snake, the mortality rate is also 100%.

In addition to snakes, highly poisonous creatures include Komodo dragons, spiders, scorpions, centipedes, etc. Even if the poison is weak, it is not something that human babies can resist.

After talking about toxicity, let's talk about hunger.

A 1-year-old baby doesn't know what food to eat and what not to eat. When adults disappear in an instant, except for the only food left at home, the baby will soon face hunger problems.

I saw someone say "baby can go to the supermarket to eat for free", this idea really shocked me, a 1-year-old baby can't even walk, let alone walk to the supermarket on both feet, besides, the location of the supermarket, the baby doesn't even know Know.

Even if babies can go to the supermarket, they don't know what to eat and what not to eat.

Take sprouted potatoes, how do they know that sprouted potatoes cannot be eaten?

Even if they get the food, how do they process it? They don't know how to use kitchen utensils such as microwave ovens and gas stoves. Reckless use of fire can easily cause large-scale fires.

So even without animal infestation, babies 1 year and younger worldwide die from food problems.

In addition, how to solve the problem of temperature? Once all adults disappear, as human babies of constant temperature creatures, how will they maintain their body temperature?

In addition to areas with warm climates throughout the year, other areas with obvious four seasons will cause the death of the baby.

Without the guidance of adults, there will be no language communication between babies at all. These are not inheritances imprinted in genes. Maybe when the children become adults, they will gradually develop a new language, but the children will not live to adulthood at all.

In the end, we conclude that babies under the age of 1 will die from food problems. If food is aside, babies at high latitudes will die from constant temperature, and babies at low latitudes will die from biological invasion.

Because green plants spread very fast in low-latitude areas, a large number of creatures will soon enter the human city full of green plants to survive. At that time, there will inevitably be a head-on conflict between the baby and the animal. Considering the combat power of the human baby, There is only one result, that is, "group destruction", and human civilization dissipates.

what you think?

Science

About the Creator

Vicky

The world is so wonderful, let's get to know the world together!

Enjoyed the story?
Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also pledge your support or give them a one-off tip, letting them know you appreciate their work.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

    VickyWritten by Vicky

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.