Dialogue

What Is Success?
Introduction This is for ViM's May "Commencement Speech" Prompt that you can read about here: The music is "Success" by Iggy Pop
By Mike Singleton 💜 Mikeydred about a year ago in Critique
Title: Legal Threats and Financial Coercion: The Relationship School’s Pattern of Silencing and Pressuring Students. Content Warning.
Article: A growing number of former students are coming forward to share disturbing allegations against The Relationship School, founded by self-proclaimed relationship expert Jayson Gaddis. The central claims involve a pattern of legal intimidation, coercive financial tactics, and false accusations of fraud—all designed to force students to remain silent, pay thousands of dollars, and waive their right to dispute charges.
By Kevinabout a year ago in Critique
Title: The Relationship School’s Pattern of Legal Threats and Chargeback Intimidation: A Closer Look at the Facts. Content Warning.
Article: In recent months, The Relationship School, founded by self-styled relationship expert Jayson Gaddis, has come under scrutiny for a disturbing pattern of legal intimidation, financial pressure, and aggressive response to negative feedback. At the center of these complaints are allegations that the School uses cease-and-desist letters, fraudulent labeling, and backdoor communication with banks to suppress refund attempts and silence critical voices.
By Kevinabout a year ago in Critique
The Relationship School’s Pattern of Legal Threats and Chargeback Intimidation: A Closer Look at the Facts. Content Warning.
Article: In recent months, The Relationship School, founded by Jayson Gaddis, has come under fire for its aggressive tactics toward students and former clients who raise concerns or seek financial recourse. Among the most troubling patterns is the organization’s frequent use of defamation accusations against individuals who speak out about their negative experiences. Equally concerning is the School’s alleged misuse of chargeback systems and reported attempts to undermine consumers’ legal right to dispute unauthorized or misrepresented charges.
By Kevinabout a year ago in Critique
The Relationship School Review by Jayson Gaddis: Contracts, Silence, and Legal Threats in an Unregulated Coaching Program. Content Warning.
Introduction: A School Without Standards—But With Legal Power The Relationship School, founded by Jayson Gaddis, promises to train students into “certified relationship coaches” through emotionally transformative programs. The branding is heartfelt. The testimonials are moving. The price tag? At least $5,000.
By Kevinabout a year ago in Critique
Is Gram Chikitsalay as Good as Panchayat? "Honest Review"
Look, content king TVF has again brought another piece of content on Amazon Prime Video. If you don't know about TVF, then "Kota Factory," "Aspirants," "Gullak," "Panchayat," "Yeh Meri Family," "TVF Tripling," "Pitchers," and "Cubicles." Oh my God, TVF people have created amazing content after amazing content.
By Ayush Vermaabout a year ago in Critique
Will Operation Sindoor lead the Pak-India to a full scale War?
### Introduction On May 7, 2025, the Indian Armed Forces launched "Operation Sindoor," a significant military operation targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). This operation was a direct response to the brutal terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025, which claimed the lives of 26 civilians, including 25 Indians and one Nepali citizen. The operation, characterized by precision strikes on nine terror camps, marked one of India’s most expansive retaliatory actions in recent years, drawing global attention and sparking a range of reactions from international stakeholders. This article provides a comprehensive examination of Operation Sindoor, covering its background, execution, strategic significance, international responses, and broader implications. ### Background and Context The Pahalgam terror attack was a pivotal event that set the stage for Operation Sindoor. On April 22, 2025, terrorists associated with the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), operating under the guise of The Resistance Front (TRF), attacked tourists in the scenic town of Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir’s Anantnag district. The attackers selectively targeted Hindu men, killing 26 civilians, including an Indian Navy officer and a newlywed groom, Lieutenant Vinay Narwal. The attack was particularly gruesome, with reports of husbands being killed in front of their wives, leaving behind haunting images of grieving widows, one of whom was photographed beside her husband’s body, her sindoor (red vermilion worn by married Hindu women) symbolizing the profound loss. This image, widely circulated on social media, became a powerful symbol of the tragedy and fueled public outrage in India. Indian investigations quickly established links between the attackers and Pakistan-based terrorist organizations, particularly LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). The government accused Pakistan of harboring terrorists and failing to take action against the perpetrators despite international pressure. In the weeks following the attack, India implemented a series of diplomatic measures against Pakistan, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, closing the Attari land border crossing, downgrading diplomatic ties, and canceling most visa categories for Pakistani citizens. These steps signaled India’s intent to respond decisively to what it described as Pakistan’s complicity in cross-border terrorism. On April 29, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a high-level meeting with India’s top defense officials, granting the armed forces “complete operational freedom” to determine the mode, targets, and timing of a response to the Pahalgam attack. The decision to launch Operation Sindoor was informed by intelligence reports indicating that Pakistan-based terrorist groups were planning further attacks against India. The operation’s codename, “Sindoor,” was a poignant reference to the red vermilion worn by Hindu women, symbolizing the personal losses endured by the victims’ families, particularly the widows of Pahalgam, and underscoring India’s resolve to deliver justice. ### Planning and Preparation Operation Sindoor was meticulously planned to ensure precision, minimize collateral damage, and avoid escalation with Pakistan’s military. The Indian Armed Forces, comprising the Army, Navy, and Air Force, coordinated a tri-service operation executed from Indian territory. The planning phase, which began shortly after the Pahalgam attack, involved identifying 21 potential terrorist targets, of which nine were selected for the strikes based on credible intelligence about their role in planning and executing attacks against India. These targets were associated with banned terrorist organizations, including Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), and Hizbul Mujahideen. The operation was overseen by senior military and civilian officials, with Prime Minister Modi and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval closely monitoring developments. According to reports, operation officers were sequestered in South Block, the seat of India’s defense and external affairs ministries, for four days leading up to May 5, when the operation was finalized and approved. The Indian Air Force issued a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) on May 6, announcing large-scale military drills along the India-Pakistan border, which was later revealed to be a cover for the impending strikes. The selection of targets was guided by a commitment to avoid civilian casualties and damage to non-military infrastructure. The nine targets included four sites in Pakistan—Mehmoona Joya Camp and Sarjal Camp in Sialkot, Markaz Taiba in Muridke, and Markaz Subhan in Bahawalpur—and five in PoJK, including Markaz Abbas in Kotli, Syedna Bilal Camp in Muzaffarabad, and Shwawai Nalla Camp. These locations were known strongholds of LeT and JeM, with some, like the Muridke facility, having been used to train terrorists involved in major attacks, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks. ### Execution of Operation Sindoor Operation Sindoor commenced in the early hours of May 7, 2025, with strikes conducted between 1:05 AM and 1:30 AM. The operation involved 24 precision missile strikes, executed using advanced weaponry, including loitering munitions and special precision munitions, designed to minimize collateral damage. The Indian Air Force, supported by drones and special forces, targeted the nine terror camps with pinpoint accuracy, destroying infrastructure and eliminating key terrorist operatives. The strikes were described as “focused, measured, and non-escalatory” by the Indian Ministry of Defence, with no Pakistani military facilities targeted to avoid provoking a broader conflict. According to Indian sources, over 80 terrorists were killed, including at least 70 confirmed casualties, and more than 60 were injured. Among the casualties were 10 family members and four aides of JeM chief Maulana Masood Azhar, significantly degrading the operational capabilities of JeM and LeT. The Mehmoona Joya Terrorist Camp in Sialkot and the LeT headquarters in Muridke were among the key facilities destroyed. The operation was completed in just 25 minutes, showcasing the Indian military’s efficiency and coordination. Videos released during a subsequent press briefing showed multiple hits on the targeted sites, with explosions and thick smoke clouds visible, confirming the destruction of terrorist infrastructure. The Indian Army announced the operation’s success on social media platform X at 1:51 AM, posting, “#PahalgamTerrorAttack Justice is Served. Jai Hind!” This message was echoed by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who wrote, “Bharat Mata ki Jai,” reflecting national pride in the operation. ### Strategic and Symbolic Significance Operation Sindoor was not only a military operation but also a strategic and symbolic statement. Strategically, it aimed to dismantle terrorist infrastructure, deter future attacks, and signal India’s zero-tolerance policy toward cross-border terrorism. By targeting key LeT and JeM facilities, India disrupted the operational networks responsible for planning attacks, including the Pahalgam massacre. The operation’s precision and restraint underscored India’s ability to conduct high-impact military actions without escalating into a full-scale conflict with Pakistan, a nuclear-armed neighbor. Symbolically, the codename “Sindoor” carried deep emotional resonance. It humanized the victims of the Pahalgam attack, particularly the women who lost their husbands, and served as a reminder of the personal toll of terrorism. The operation was framed as a tribute to the 26 victims and a means of delivering closure to their families. For instance, Aishanya Dwivedi, who lost her husband in the Pahalgam attack, described the operation as a “personal tribute” to the victims, while the family of Lieutenant Vinay Narwal saw it as a fitting response to their loss. The operation also reinforced India’s sovereignty and right to self-defense, as articulated by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri during a press briefing. Misri emphasized that the strikes were a response to Pakistan’s failure to act against terrorist groups operating from its soil, citing the case of Sajid Mir, a key planner of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, who continued to enjoy impunity in Pakistan. The operation’s timing, two weeks after the Pahalgam attack, demonstrated India’s resolve to act swiftly and decisively when faced with credible threats. ### International Reactions Operation Sindoor elicited a range of reactions from the international community, reflecting the complex geopolitics of the India-Pakistan rivalry. The United States, through President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, expressed concern over the escalation but urged de-escalation and a peaceful resolution. Trump described the situation as a “shame” and hoped it would “end very quickly,” while Rubio confirmed ongoing engagement with Indian and Pakistani leaders. The U.S. media, including The New York Times, framed the strikes as a “calibrated counter-terror measure,” aligning with India’s narrative. European nations, including France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, expressed solidarity with India, condemning the Pahalgam attack and supporting India’s right to respond to terrorism. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar briefed his counterparts in these countries, thanking them for their support. Japan’s Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya also condemned the Pahalgam attack and was briefed on the operation. Russia and Saudi Arabia were among the countries India reached out to, with senior officials briefed on the strikes. The Indian embassy in Washington emphasized that India had “credible leads” and “technical inputs” pointing to Pakistan’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack, justifying the operation as a necessary deterrent. Conversely, Pakistan condemned the strikes as an “act of war,” claiming 26 civilian deaths and 46 injuries, though India disputed these figures, asserting that no civilian infrastructure was targeted. Pakistan’s National Security Council, chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, authorized the military to retaliate “at a time, place, and manner of its choosing,” invoking Article 51 of the UN Charter. Azerbaijan expressed solidarity with Pakistan, condemning the strikes and calling for restraint, while China’s state-run Global Times faced criticism from the Indian embassy in Beijing for spreading “disinformation” about the operation. The United Nations, through Secretary-General António Guterres, expressed concern about the military operations and called for “maximum military restraint” to avoid a broader confrontation. The UN’s stance reflected the global community’s apprehension about the potential for escalation between two nuclear-armed neighbors. ### Domestic Reactions and Security Measures In India, Operation Sindoor was met with widespread bipartisan support and public approval. Political leaders across party lines, including Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, lauded the armed forces for their courage and precision. Singh emphasized that the operation targeted only those responsible for killing innocent civilians, while Gandhi described it as a moment of pride for the nation. Senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor praised the strikes as “calibrated, calculated, and precise,” advocating for restraint to prevent further escalation. The operation prompted heightened security measures across India, particularly in states bordering Pakistan. Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma canceled police leaves and directed officials to strengthen security in border areas. Union Home Minister Amit Shah held a review meeting with chief ministers and lieutenant governors of states bordering Pakistan and Nepal, discussing preparedness for mock drills under “Operation Abhyaas,” a nationwide safety initiative. The Indian Air Force placed air defense units along the India-Pakistan border on high alert, anticipating potential Pakistani retaliation. Civil aviation was significantly disrupted, with 18 airports, including those in Srinagar, Leh, Jammu, and Amritsar, shut down and over 200 domestic and international flights canceled. Airlines like SpiceJet and IndiGo issued advisories, with cancellations extending until May 10 in some cases. These measures reflected the government’s caution in the face of heightened tensions. ### Pakistan’s Response and Escalation Pakistan’s response to Operation Sindoor was swift and aggressive. Within hours of the strikes, Pakistani troops violated the ceasefire, resorting to heavy artillery fire and shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) in the Bhimber Gali sector of Jammu and Kashmir’s Poonch-Rajouri area and the Karnah area of Kupwara district. Indian officials reported 15 Indian deaths and 43 injuries due to Pakistani shelling, while Pakistan claimed seven deaths and 38 injuries along the LoC. The Indian Army responded in a “calibrated manner,” but the exchanges marked the worst fighting between the two nations in over two decades. Pakistan’s military spokesperson, the Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), confirmed Indian strikes on three locations—Bahawalpur, Kotli, and Muzaffarabad—and vowed a response. The Pakistani government’s rhetoric, including Prime Minister Sharif’s description of the strikes as an “act of war,” raised fears of a prolonged conflict. Former Pakistani minister Bilawal Bhutto criticized India’s actions, accusing it of issuing “belligerent threats” in the preceding weeks. ### Media Coverage and Public Sentiment Operation Sindoor garnered extensive coverage in both Indian and international media. Indian outlets, including The Times of India, The Hindu, India Today, and NDTV, provided detailed updates, emphasizing the operation’s precision and success. Exclusive visuals of destroyed terror camps, such as the LeT headquarters in Muridke, were broadcast by India Today, reinforcing the narrative of a decisive blow against terrorism. The Hindu BusinessLine described the operation as a “swift and strategic response,” while The Indian Express noted its scale as the most expansive since the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. International media coverage varied. U.S. and British publications, such as The New York Times, highlighted the operation’s counter-terror focus but underscored the risk of escalation. Al Jazeera reported Pakistan’s claims of civilian casualties, while Reuters noted Islamabad’s vow to retaliate. Social media platforms, particularly X, were abuzz with reactions, with Indian users posting patriotic slogans like “Jai Hind” and “Bharat Mata ki Jai,” while some Pakistani users condemned the strikes. Posts on X also revealed planning details, with one user claiming that the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) had identified 21 targets, nine of which were struck. Public sentiment in India was overwhelmingly supportive, with citizens viewing the operation as a necessary response to the Pahalgam attack. However, some voices, including a post on X by @xlntgson, expressed concern about the potential for a protracted conflict and the loss of innocent lives, highlighting the human cost of such operations. ### Implications and Future Prospects Operation Sindoor has significant implications for India-Pakistan relations and regional stability. The operation has heightened tensions, with Pakistan’s retaliatory shelling and threats of further action raising the specter of a broader conflict. The nuclear capabilities of both nations amplify the stakes, prompting international calls for restraint. The UN’s warning about the unaffordability of a military confrontation underscores the need for diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation. For India, the operation reinforces its stance against terrorism and its willingness to take unilateral action when necessary. However, it also places India under scrutiny to manage the fallout and prevent escalation. The government’s outreach to global powers, including the U.S., Russia, and Saudi Arabia, reflects an effort to build international support and counter Pakistan’s narrative of victimization. Pakistan faces a dilemma: while its government has vowed to respond, any significant retaliation risks further Indian action and international isolation, given India’s evidence of Pakistan’s links to terrorism. Pakistan’s claims of civilian casualties may garner sympathy from allies like Azerbaijan and China, but they are unlikely to shift the broader international consensus, which has largely supported India’s right to self-defense. The operation also highlights the ongoing challenge of terrorism in South Asia. While Operation Sindoor disrupted key terrorist networks, the persistence of groups like LeT and JeM suggests that long-term solutions require addressing the root causes of terrorism, including state sponsorship and radicalization. Diplomatic engagement, though currently strained, remains essential to prevent further violence. ### Conclusion Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India’s resolve to combat terrorism and deliver justice for the victims of the Pahalgam attack. Executed with precision and restraint, the operation targeted nine terror camps, disrupted terrorist networks, and sent a clear message to Pakistan about the consequences of supporting cross-border terrorism. The codename “Sindoor” encapsulated the emotional weight of the operation, honoring the personal losses endured by the victims’ families. However, the operation has also escalated tensions, with Pakistan’s retaliatory actions and threats of further response raising the risk of a wider conflict. The international community’s cautious response underscores the need for de-escalation and diplomacy to prevent a crisis between two nuclear-armed neighbors. As India and Pakistan navigate the aftermath, Operation Sindoor will likely be remembered as a pivotal moment in their fraught relationship, highlighting both the urgency of countering terrorism and the challenges of maintaining peace in a volatile region.[](https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pahalgam-terror-attack-operation-sindoor-launch-live-updates-may-7-2025/article69543511.ece)[](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/operation-sindoor-full-list-of-9-terror-sites-targeted-by-indian-army-in-pakistan-pok/articleshow/120947736.cms)[](https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-pakistan-tension-live-updates-operation-sindoor-pahalgam-terror-attack-jammu-and-kashmir-military-strike-latest-news-bahawalpur-8348396)
By Fahad Ghaniabout a year ago in Critique
Cardinals choosing the next pope have been offered a dossier on candidates – with a subtext. Content Warning. AI-Generated.
Cardinals Choosing the Next Pope Have Been Offered a Dossier on Candidates – With a Subtext May 7, 2025 As speculation mounts about who will succeed Pope Francis, an intriguing development has emerged behind the scenes: cardinals preparing for a future conclave are quietly being offered dossiers detailing the strengths, weaknesses, and past actions of potential papal candidates. But these documents aren’t just dry summaries – they come with a subtle subtext that could shape the future direction of the Catholic Church.
By Rasel Ahmedabout a year ago in Critique
‘He Said – Hold Even a Straw and Show Me’ — The Raid That Challenged Ajay Devgan Like Never Before
So yes, the story of Raid 2 follows up its first part Raid. Actually, the story is different but is connected from there, where we are shown that our brother Ajay Devgan's 75th raid takes place, and in this 75th raid, he carried out at Ritesh Deshmukh's place. Now, what is the difference between the story of Raid 2 and the story of Raid 1? Which story is very good, and then should we go to watch Raid 2 in the theatre? In Raid 2, we are shown the story of our Ajay Devgan sahab; this time, Ajay Devgan has raided the house of corrupt politician Ritesh Deshmukh, where a complaint comes that a lot of black money is kept at his house. Here, our Ritesh Deshmukh Sahab is a relative of the legendary actor of Raid 1, who was shown as Tauji, whose house was raided. Ritesh Deshmukh knows how Ajay Devgan's character is, what his tactics are, how he raids, and he is not a corrupt officer at all; he is very strict, and no one goes against him. Due to this, Ritesh Deshmukh accepts this challenge and says to Ajay Devgan you are raiding my place, hold even a straw and show me; the raid is done in the same part 1 style; it is very fun to watch. People get stuck there, and they think that things are getting more complicated, but what is it this time? This time, the matter is that this time the aura has been kept a little bigger, and things have been expanded in comparison to Part 1. So, for those who have not seen Raid 1, my recommendation is to definitely watch Raid 1 because Raid, which was Ajay Devgan's movie, can be called the most legendary, no less than legendary. Whatever things we got to see in it, whatever atmosphere we got to see, it was unsuccessful in making Raid 2. If someone has seen a legendary film like Raid, then he might be a bit disappointed in Raid Part 2, but if someone has missed it, then he will like Raid 2 very much. Now the difference here was that when the raid was done in Raid 1, it would not be wrong to say that at that time people's breath stopped, people were seeing money coming out from everywhere, sometimes from sofas, sometimes from walls, sometimes from stairs, sometimes from the roof, sometimes from the basement and who knows from where else, it showed something mind-boggling. Whereas in Raid 2 we were shown simple things which did not seem so fascinating as they should have gone one level higher. We got to see the same blueprint of the story of Raid 1, the raid is being conducted in the same way. But yes, it is a bit fun because Ritesh Deshmukh's acting was also superb, and what can we say about Ajay Devgan's acting? The role of Tamannaah Bhatia that we were shown in this is a completely side character and I feel that the makers cast her but probably forgot to give her any work. Vaani Kapoor did not look good in this film at all because the work done by the first actress, Ileana D'Cruz, in Raid 1 is far superior — Vaani Kapoor doesn’t even come close. That's why I did not like Vaani Kapoor at all. In the movie too, you won't really see her doing anything significant. There is work of only two men and that is Ritesh Deshmukh and Ajay Devgan. Overall, Raid 2 is a one-time watch. You can go to the theatre and enjoy it with your family, friends, and girlfriend. It is fun and it is really fun. In this heat, buy a ticket of 150-200 rupees and go inside the theatre and watch the movie sitting in AC. What more do you need? Now if we talk about its climax, I found its climax quite good. I want to give a spoiler alert here. In the movie, we are shown that Ritesh Deshmukh challenged Ajey Devgan with all his tricks, but till now, Ajay Devgan has not faced anything like that. It was a great fight. But due to his cleverness, Ritesh Deshmukh fails, and Ajay Devgan goes ahead of him and beats him in such a way that in the end, when a scene opens in the climax, it looks so terrifying that if I say it in the language of my Haryanvi brothers, it is Swaad Aa Gya. So those who haven't seen the movie, go and watch the movie quickly. That's all for now. Don't forget to Subscribe for more related content and give me one heart.
By Ayush Vermaabout a year ago in Critique
The Eternaut (2025) Netflix Review – A Slow-Burn Sci-Fi Survival Series with Flaws
The Eternaut is a sci-fi survival series which was released in Hindi on Netflix. I would also like to tell you that this series has a total of six episodes, and each episode is between 45 to 60 minutes. And now, I have watched this series, and I am sharing with you guys through this review whatever good or bad experience I had watching this series. So without wasting any time, let's talk about how my experience was watching this series. So first of all, I will tell you guys a little about the story of this series. You will see in this series that after a deadly snowfall, many people have died and the few people who survived are now facing another big danger. Now, what is that danger, and from whom, and what will these people do for their survival? To know all this, you will have to watch this series. Now let's talk about my experience of watching this series. I like watching post-apocalyptic survival thriller shows, and the post-apocalyptic setting of this series is good, and the story is also not bad. But the problem is that the execution is done in a very slow or dull way. The start of this series is very slow. After episode 3, you will see a twist in the story and from there the story starts getting interesting. But despite that, you will not see any special action in this series. If you watch this show thinking that it will be a fast-paced, action-packed series, then it is not so. There is very little action in this series, the focus is more on the characters and the survival drama going on between them, which is just okay. I could not yet get emotionally invested in the characters or the story of this series. Apart from this, I have seen a lot of loopholes in the story, but yes, the performances of the actors are good, and the music and production work of the series are all good.
By Ayush Vermaabout a year ago in Critique
Weak Hero Class 2 Review: You Thought Season 1 Was Intense? Think Again!
So finally, I have completed watching Season 2 of Weak Hero, and I think in April, it was the most anticipated Korean drama series which many people wanted to watch, but on the day this series was released, multiple movies were released, like Havoc, Until Dawn, The Accountant 2 and many more. Due to this, I was left behind in watching Weak Hero Class 2, and there are many more episodes in it. Along with this, there is another series, You Season 5, which I had to watch as well. It had 10 episodes, so I had to consume a lot of content, and that is why I was not able to review Weak Hero Class 2 as soon as possible. But now, finally, I have come up with this, which I think everyone will know what story we got to see. After what happened in the first season, how our hero has to go to another school in this season where this time he is going to face even more dangerous, aggressive, strong children who are very expert in bullying, and it means that you will get to see the bully system inside this school as well. And I found this to be a very unique series, till now we have seen our heroes go to fight on the border, where they have to face challenges; there are drug lords; our heroes escape from criminals, escape from some dangerous people, escape from the police, escape from the government. But here we are shown the story of a school in a very minimalistic way where a child who is a normal person wants to live a normal life but the dangerous children who bully the children start harassing him and then how our hero saves himself from them and teaches them a lesson, all these things have been shown very well in it which I liked a lot in the first season and in this season also that thing has been continued where I tell you in advance that this series is not of the same level as season one. Now because there are some reasons for that, you all must know that when we were watching season one, we did not know much about our hero or the world of this series. That is why there was a mystery type thing in our mind about what he would do next, but this time, we know everything, so because of this, that element got reduced a bit due to which it is not of that level, but still, you will find it a very good series. I liked everyone's performance very much and the story too. Like Season 1, the action in Season 2 also feels very realistic. The way our hero faces dangerous situations this time, too, is a lot of fun to watch. So, it is not as good as Season 1, but still, in my opinion, Season 2 has been a very good follow-up season. You should definitely not miss it. The performances of all the actors are good, no doubt, the action and everything has been choreographed very well. The production budget of the series is very good, and you should definitely watch this series. But yes, to watch Season 2, you will have to watch Season 1 and you cannot watch this series with family because there are no adult or nude scenes in it but there are plenty of abuses which are quite good to watch, meaning at some places I remembered Mirzapur where you will remember Munna Bhaiya, Guddu Pandit used to abuse a lot, you will get to see something similar in it, meaning in comparison to the first season, you will get to hear a lot of abuses in this season which will give you a lot of fun, you will enjoy it. So now, what are you waiting for? Go to Netflix and start the show. And yes, it is available in Hindi as well.
By Ayush Vermaabout a year ago in Critique
Thank you, 'Paris, Texas (1984)'
Nearly two months ago, I had the privilege of watching 'Paris, Texas' by Wim Wenders for the first time. Before anybody comes at me for not watching it earlier, I humbly concede the fact that I didn't possess the sensitivity to appreciate something as poignant until recently.
By Gourav Bhattacharya2 years ago in Critique