Art logo

Arty Farty – Are You Serious?

The price of art in the eyes of the beholder

By Calvin LondonPublished about a month ago • 2 min read
Top Story - August 2026
Author's image created in NightCafe_2026

I recently read an article discussing the ten most famous paintings in the world. It reminded me of a visit to an art gallery about twenty years ago. Don’t get the wrong idea here. I am not an arty person. I have a few original paintings in my house that I bought for the colours and the overall “likeness factor."

I have been lucky enough to see the Mona Lisa in the Louvre Gallery in Paris. After queuing up for over an hour, I was bitterly disappointed. I never really liked it as a painting.

This painting gets over 20,000 visitors a day. It is credited as the most famous painting in the world. I felt I had to see it to say I had. I was unimpressed by its small size (77 by 53 centimetres).I could never paint like that. I’m not saying Leonardo da Vinci is a bad artist.

I admire paintings like “Birth of Venus” by Botticelli, “The Night Watch” by Rembrandt, and “The Last Supper” by da Vinci. I can see the skill in each one. The level of detail in each is truly amazing.

“The Starry Night” by Vincent van Gogh is much more appealing to me. I love the colours and the excitement that it instils. I have a couple of abstract paintings like this one, painted by Australian artist McBett.

“The Scream” by Edvard Munch also does nothing for me, except to scare me. I would hate to have it on a wall and come across it halfway through the night. He actually made five versions of the same painting.

The Mona Lisa is officially listed as priceless. Hypothetical values range from $800 million to over 1 billion. The Birth of Venus, The Night Watch, and The Starry Night are all considered priceless. Experts believe the open-market value is between $500 million and $2 billion.

Even the pastel version of The Scream sold at Sotheby's for $119.9 million USD

Mark Rothko "No. 6 (Violet, Green and Red)" below sold at a closed auction in 2014 for 186 million dollars. In 1951, Rothko created a piece meant to connect with our basic emotions, like his other works. Personally, I don’t see it.

No. 6 (Violet, Green and Red) - Mark Rothko

So, this brings me to my gripe and amazement.  I started by talking about a gallery I visited many years ago.  On the wall was a painting that was selling for over $3000.  It was (as above), nothing but a white canvas.  The owner of the art gallery was horrified when I said I could go out this afternoon with a roller and bang out five of these.  Not bad for an afternoon’s work!

He tried to convince me that the artist who made it cost what it did.  I don’t disagree, but surely the piece of art also has to have some credibility.

[A/n: This is part of my ongoing quest to write at least one story for each of the Vocal communities. Only twelve to go.]

Till next time,

Calvin

Contemporary ArtPaintingFine ArtCritique

About the Creator

Calvin London

I write fiction, non-fiction and poetry about all things weird and wonderful, past and present. Life is full of different things to spark your imagination. All you have to do is embrace it - join me on my journey.

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also become a paid subscriber, letting them know you appreciate their work.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Calvin London