Viva logo

Let's Take a Moment to Talk about Marion Zimmer Bradley

A Conversation Many Pagan Women Have Been Having in Recent Years

By Diane NivensPublished 6 years ago 6 min read
Like
Nearly ten years ago, a book was put into my hands, as it was for thousands of other women before me; a beautiful work of fiction that would become a beacon of inspiration for many women walking a different spiritual path. It was a massive text that told the story of King Arthur, his queen, his knights, and his sister. This story was different though. Arthur wasn't the focus. Instead, his sister Morgaine was the focus and her path of spirituality. Arthur was merely a pawn. Morgaine had the focus and discipline we all craved to be dedicated to our faith. She was brutally honest about her struggles and strife. She was a heroine that we felt connected to because she had so many traits and personality quirks we could all relate to. The way the author, a stand out woman at a time when men dominated all industries, created a new world based on both history and fantasy captured all our minds, and had the power to rekindle our faith in a new way. Then, in 2014, Bradley's daughter had some things to say about her mother that rocked us all. Her daughter went public about the abuses her mother inflicted on her. I'm not talking about only physical violence, but sexual molestation as well. Not just of herself, but of other girls. They were abused by Bradley as well as her husband. Her husband ended up with a conviction because of it, though Bradley got away unscathed at the time. She painted our hero author in a new light that no one wanted to know existed. It was a sucker-punch. At the time, Bradley had been dead for fifteen years, yet sparked a new debate that we're still having four years later. Can we still read that book? Can we still like that book? What do we do now?

The Mists of Avalon is truly a wonderful work of art. It was so popular that it even sparked a miniseries. I've known women that named their daughters after the lead character because of how strong she is and how strong they wanted their daughters to be. A question that the truth of Bradley's sinister personal life brings up is this: In a time of boycotting abusers' works (because of the avalanche of victims stepping forward and naming them in the entertainment industry), how are we supposed to treat this piece of art that has been a staple in our library for decades?

One rule that everyone agrees on is that we can't cherry pick which victims to believe. I've had many conversations with groups of Pagan women on the topic of this book and its creator. No one that I've spoken to has ever questioned the validity of Bradley's daughter. As strong feminists, we know we have to band together and support all victims when they speak out. Her mother was long dead when she came forward, so what did she have to gain by speaking ill of her mother if it was false? Absolutely nothing.

The only place to go to next in the conversation is to look at how we've treated abusive artists in the past:

Roald Dahl was a racist, yet we're still turning his children's books into movies.Elvis was a sex symbol that preferred having sleepovers with 14-year-old girls. Frank Sinatra was an abusive alcoholic that once fired a gun at a mattress and threatened to kill himself if his wife left him. Charlie Chaplin liked having sex with teenage girls. Lewis Carroll has been noted as a pedophile. It has been speculated whether J.M. Barrie was also a pedophile. And finally, John Lennon would sing songs to the world about how all we need is love, then go home and mercilessly beat his wife, who he later abandoned along with his son.

This is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of rampant abuse and sexual predators throughout our entertainment history, yet this brief list of abusers have all created lasting works that are considered staples to literature and entertainment and love for their work goes unquestioned.

So, what's going on here? People are separating the art from the artist. The thing about all those people is that they're dead. They were awful, yes, but they can't hurt anyone anymore. Being a terrible person doesn't detract from the beauty of the art they create because, unlike the artists themselves, art is lasting. Yes, John Lennon was a piece of shit, but people can enjoy the music he left to the world while remaining guilt-free. Why is this, though? It's because a person cannot benefit from your money after they are dead. Another reason? It's in the past. The past is full of pain. Going forward, we can set new standards for what is and is not acceptable behavior. See, at the time they were alive, these artists were products of the society that they thrived in. Racism used to be okay. Having sex with teenagers used to be okay. Domestic abuse used to be okay. Have times changed? Absolutely. Has society changed? Absolutely, though some pockets still cling to the past a bit too favorably. These actions are not okay anymore because we have all learned from the mistakes of the past. There's a particular scene in Mists that I've heard discussed at length. It's a scene where a pubescent girl, representing young fertility, is given as a symbolic sacrifice in a ceremony and has questionably consensual sex with an older man. Since the news of Bradley's molestation of girls the same age as the nameless character in the scene, it has been viewed with more scrutiny. Personally, I always took it as a historical representation of how things once were. Child brides were once common practice in most societies. I never viewed this scene as being permissive towards having sex with children. I think that is also the way it needs to be viewed, as historical representation. The past is littered with uncomfortable situations. Talking about them doesn't make them more real, and ignoring them will never truly erase what happened because the past is best remembered by the victims. However, by talking openly about how things used to be, and why they needed to change, we create an atmosphere that allows victims to come forward and tell their story. That is how Bradley's daughter was able to come forward. Had she told her story in 2004 instead of 2014, she could have been met with a very different outcome.

Now what? Well, I need to mention that after Bradley's daughter went public, she received support from Janni Lee Simner, an author that found success on a platform created by Bradley, and who also still writes in Bradley's Darkover series. Simner decided to donate money she gained from Bradley's platform to charity.

So, should you feel guilt over this book? I don't think you should, but ultimately that is your decision. She's dead. She died 19 years ago. She did some terrible things, but she's dead. She will have no new victims. We can create an atmosphere of compassion for victims and hold people to better standards now and in the future, but we should not feel guilt over other's atrocities. Buying her book was not giving her permission to be a terrible person, nor did it give her the means to be terrible. It would be silly to boycott her books because she's not alive to make apologies, to care what other's think of her, or to care how her actions impacted others. However, if you're still uncomfortable with the book, there are a plethora of amazing feminist and pagan authors out there that have created wonderful books. I adore Laurell K. Hamilton's Merry Gentry series. (Highly erotic, yet plenty of story line and character growth.The sex is a bonus.) Anne McCaffrey has been touted as one of the grandmothers of the fantasy genre. Mercedes Lackey is strongly feminist in her fiction works. That's just a starting point.

If you feel uncomfortable with a once-favorite because of the actions of its creator, dig into the reasons why. I can tell you that your love of the books by Marion Zimmer Bradley do not make you guilty by association. If you are comfortable reading Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Matilda, James and the Giant Peach, Alice in Wonderland, or Peter Pan, then there's no reason you should be uncomfortable reading The Mists of Avalon. However, some time may be needed before you pick it up again. Time heals all wounds. It doesn't erase the actions that created the wounds, but it can heal the pains if given the opportunity.

Personally, I think this time of inner turmoil felt by so many women is the perfect time to read it again. Look at it with a new perspective. Being uncomfortable is how we create positive change. Buying the book puts no new money into Bradley's pocket, but there are always libraries and secondhand bookstores if you can't bring yourself to fork over the cash for it. In reading it again, you may find new things about the book you never noticed before. I know I've been staring at my first edition copy of it for some time now. I'm ready to go through it again with new eyes.

celebrities
Like

About the Creator

Diane Nivens

Just trying to find my place in this big world. I've got a lot to say if you've got the time to listen.

Twitter: @DianeNivens87

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.