I don’t know why, but whenever there are reports in the media about a mass shooting, such as the recent tragedy in California’s Monterey Park, or a missing sea vessel or plane, like the 2014 disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, I immediately ask myself: “Who were the victims?”
I guess the reason is that catastrophic events such as these represent a potential means to eradicate possible threats that people in power would rather see buried… and the alleged perpetrators of these acts are frequently patsies, with detailed knowledge of the victims being the only means to discover the absolute truth behind the events.
A clearer picture of the victims of the Monterey Park horror is emerging, with all 11 fatalities now identified, but little has really been revealed about their backgrounds other than they were all aged between 57 and 76.
On Sunday the person believed to have been responsible for the shooting at the Star Ballroom Dance Studio was also named, the man believed to have fatally gunned down the 11 victims and wounded nine more identified as 72-year-old Huu Can Tran, who was found dead in the nearby city of Torrance, about 30 miles southwest of Monterey Park, after shooting himself as police approached his vehicle – so no chance there of him ever being tried in court.
According to Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna, the suspect also targeted the Lai Lai Ballroom and Studio in nearby Alhambra but was disarmed by two civilians who wrestled his weapon away from him before he fled the scene. The gunman was using what local authorities said was a magazine-fed assault-style pistol.
So, in the eyes of the media, the case is probably now as good as solved. The names of all those killed have come out, the alleged assassin can’t be tried … so the true motive behind this crime may never actually come to light.
In the case of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 the perpetrators have now been tried – eight years after the tragedy actually occurred. Two Russians and a Ukrainian were found guilty of murder in November last year for shooting down the passenger jet over eastern Ukraine, killing 298 people.
The Dutch court that tried the case ruled that a Russian-made missile – supplied from Russia and fired by an armed group under Russian control – brought down the passenger plane, with Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky and Leonid Kharchenko found guilty in absentia and sentenced to life in prison. A third Russian suspect was acquitted of the crime.
The court found that bringing down the plane, which was on route from Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport to Kuala Lumpur, was a deliberate act, even though the three found guilty had allegedly aimed to shoot down a military aircraft and not a civilian one. Really?
Girkin, the military leader of the so-called Donetsk People's Republic, was convicted of deploying the missile and seeking Russian help, while Dubinsky was found to have ordered and overseen the transport of the Buk missile launcher. Kharchenko was found to have overseen the Buk, acting on Dubinsky's instructions.
The 298 passengers and crew who lost their lives were from 17 countries – 196 were from the Netherlands, 43 from Malaysia, 38 from Australia and 10 from the United Kingdom – while 100 of those on board were destined for Melbourne, where they were believed to be intending to attend the 20th International AIDS Conference.
Now, this bit of information really set my alarm bells ringing. Could there have been someone on that list who had been targeted for eradication because of some information they may have been going to divulge in Melbourne?
There are many people worldwide who are still convinced the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that gives rise to AIDS – which, it was claimed, had jumped the species barrier from monkeys and chimpanzees to humans – was actually no freak occurrence at all… the origins of the US outbreak in the 1980s said to have been traced to the CIA’s door.
At the time the United States government was allegedly experimenting with the hepatitis B vaccine and conducted tests on gay and bisexual men in major cities, with New York – where the US outbreak was first noticed – being a focal point for the tests, following which gay and bisexual men were first reported to have the deadly disease.
However, the original cases of HIV are believed to go back to Africa in the 1950s and polio vaccines administered in the Congo.
Based on almost two decades of research that gave rise to his 1999 book, The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS, British journalist Edward Hooper lays the blame on a polio vaccine administered in the central African state.
Hooper argued that Dr Hilary Koprowski’s part in the race to create the first polio vaccine produced the epidemic and dismissed the conventional bushmeat hypothesis because the epidemic only took off in the latter half of the 20th century, while people in the Congo had been consuming bushmeat for centuries before that.
Koprowski – an American scientist who worked at Philadelphia’s Wistar Institute and was racing Dr Albert Sabin and Dr Jonas Salk to create the polio vaccine – tested his oral vaccine in the Belgian Congo and Hooper showed a geographic correlation between the first documented cases of HIV and the locations where the vaccinations were given and early cases of AIDS emerged.
"The location coincides dramatically," Hooper writes on his website, AIDS Origins. "The earliest known cases of AIDS occurred in central Africa, in the same regions where Koprowski's polio vaccine was given to over a million people in 1957-1960."
But this begs the question: how could a vaccine give a monkey virus to humans? And the answer is quite simple since the polio virus was grown in a soup of chopped-up monkey organs before being made into a vaccine, with Hooper claiming that during Koprowski's vaccination campaign kidneys from chimpanzees infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) were used to grow the virus.
Another anti-polio campaign in the 1950s injected millions of people with vaccines containing the monkey virus SV40 – a DNA virus shown to cause tumours in hamsters that normally exists as a latent infection – leading to it being banned for future use.
However, the discovery that polio and other viruses could be grown in primate cell cultures was a key breakthrough in developing polio vaccines and was instrumental in winning a Nobel Prize in 1954 for researchers Frederick Robbins, Thomas Weller and John Enders, who used human tissues for their studies.
It was later discovered that monkey kidneys could be used in vaccine production and they were commonly used to culture the polio vaccine despite frequently containing previously unknown simian viruses, some of which could infect humans.
Following the discovery of SV40, vaccine makers used Indian rhesus monkeys instead of African green monkeys to grow cultures but by the early 1980s it was discovered they were also infected with a retrovirus related to HIV that caused AIDS in humans. So SIV, a retrovirus cousin of HIV, could have been present in any vaccine made from the tissues of monkeys before 1985, the year more sophisticated testing was introduced.
So, it’s clearly a possibility that an African polio vaccine programme allowed HIV to jump the species barrier... but could its’ spread to the US have been down to a CIA-sponsored hepatitis B immunisation programme that saw the gay and bisexual communities in New York and other US cities deliberately targeted?
I guess that’s a question that will never be adequately resolved but it throws up the possibility that someone heading from Amsterdam to Melbourne for an AIDS conference in July 2014 could have been close to a cure for, or of uncovering incriminating evidence about, a virus that the CIA is alleged to have deliberately infected people with.
Now what anyone would have wanted to keep from getting out in 2014 remains a complete mystery but suggestions still circulate that a possible cure for AIDS could have been lost due to the scientists and researchers killed on Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Former president of the International Aids Society and world-renowned researcher Joep Lange was one of those among the group heading to the Melbourne conference. The co-director of the HIV Netherlands Australia Research Collaboration (HIV-NAT), Lange was professor of medicine at the Academic Medical Centre of the University of Amsterdam and a senior scientific advisor to the International Antiviral Therapy Evaluation Centre in the city.
“What if the cure for AIDS was on that plane? Really? We don’t know,” Canadian HIV researcher Trevor Stratton told ABC at the time, adding that researchers had been getting close to a vaccine for the virus. “There were some really prominent researchers that have been doing this for a very long time and we’re getting close to vaccines and people are talking about cures and the end of AIDS. And you can’t help but wonder what kind of expertise was on that plane.”
Professor Richard Boyd, director of the Monash Immunology and Stem Cell Laboratories, told the Guardian Australia: “This will have ramifications globally because whenever you lose a leader in any field it has an impact. That knowledge is irreplaceable. We’ve lost global leaders and also some bright young people who were coming through. It’s a gut-wrenching loss.”
Professor David Cooper, director of the Kirby Institute at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Australia, said Lange – who was travelling with his wife Jacqueline – had an “absolute commitment” to HIV treatment and care in Asia and Africa, adding: “The joy in collaborating with Joep was that he would always bring a fresh view, a unique take on things, and he never accepted that something was impossible to achieve.”
And, according to information from the UNSW, Lange had worked in AIDS research and treatment since 1983 and made “ground-breaking” contributions to the development of affordable treatments, playing a pioneering role in exploring affordable and simple anti-retroviral drug regimens for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission.
"I think the greatest achievement of Joep is to really give a face to the nameless people, mostly in Africa and Asia, who are suffering from one of the biggest epidemics of all time," said researcher Tobias Rinke de Wit, a member of the Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, who added that his friend had probably saved millions of lives. "There are nine million people now getting treatment in Africa and Joep contributed to that big time.”
Whether the events of 2014 were part of some elaborate cover-up remains a mystery but another strand to the plot could have been Russia’s February 2022 invasion of the Ukraine, widely seen as another New World Order work in progress.
Russia has always denied any involvement in Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 and has put out a range of alternative theories about it which were all rejected by the Dutch court. The Kremlin dismissed the legal proceedings and the suspects – except for Oleg Pulatov, who employed a team of Dutch lawyers to defend him – refused to appear in court. Probably a wise decision on Pulatov’s part since he was the solitary acquitted Russian.
The ruling is unlikely to result in anyone serving time in prison for the crime but it establishes a narrative that helps explain the phoney conflict between the countries that now exists and the west’s unerring financial backing for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
And, based on an online investigation of the events surrounding the 2014 incident by digital sleuths – including Eliot Higgins, a former office worker turned blogger, who set up the investigation website Bellingcat just three days before the plane went down in the Ukraine – the invasion that took place in 2022 was inextricably linked to the events that took place eight years earlier.
"People were just turning a blind eye to it, policymakers just weren't comfortable with calling out Russia in a way they really should have done,” Higgins said. “And they didn't react in the way that could have prevented the invasion in 2022. I think there should have been more military support for Ukraine, there should have been more sanctions, there should have been a stronger response than we saw at the time. There could have been preventative measures that would have saved a lot of lives."
And that pretty much sums up the current narrative regarding the Russia-Ukraine situation adopted by the west to justify its immense financial support for Zelensky, a former actor and screenwriter groomed by the World Economic Forum to follow his predecessor Petro Poroshenko into the Verkhovna Rada, the country’s supreme council.
But it’s not only Zelensky who has the ears of the WEF charlatans, Russian President Vladimir Putin too is an esteemed member of the gang, being a frequent participant at Davos gatherings and a contributor to the 2021 quackery via an online address since that year the meeting had assumed a digital dimension to help legitimise the organisation’s Covid plandemic agenda.
In a rambling video performance, as he brought his address to a conclusion, Putin said: “There are no borders for infections or pandemics. Therefore, we must learn the lessons from the current situation and suggest measures aimed at improving the monitoring of the emergence of such diseases and the development of such cases in the world.
“Another important area that requires coordination, in fact, the coordination of the efforts of the entire international community, is to preserve the climate and nature of our planet. I will not say anything new in this respect.
“Only together can we achieve progress in resolving such critical problems as global warming, the reduction of forestlands, the loss of biodiversity, the increase in waste, the pollution of the ocean with plastic and so on, and find an optimal balance between economic development and the preservation of the environment for the current and future generations.”
This address, featuring all the key WEF agendas, came a year before the Kremlin’s troops marched on Kiev and probably marks the point when the forum began to finalise its strategy to foment the conflict in the Ukraine.
Also, while the spotlight was on this year’s Davos talking shop, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov decided to warn that hostilities between Russia and the western powers was no longer "hybrid" but had become an "almost real" conflict that anti-Moscow countries had been "preparing for a long time".
"It is no longer a hybrid war, but an almost real one, which the west has been preparing for a long time against Russia, trying to destroy everything Russian, from the language to the culture, which has been present in Ukraine for centuries, and forbidding people to speak their native language," Lavrov said.
Speaking from South Africa where he was meeting his counterpart there, Naledi Pandor, Russia’s foreign minister accused Zelensky and his predecessor Poroshenko of having failed to keep the promises which got them elected.
"Both former president Poroshenko and current President Zelensky, who were elected under the slogan of establishing peace, immediately after being elected became war presidents and Russophobic presidents," Lavrov told the Russian news agency TASS.
In denouncing Kiev’s anti-Russian policies, Lavrov pointed out the Ukrainian authorities had even adopted laws banning the Russian language in the educational system, media and everyday life.
"All cultural contacts related to the Russian language are banned,” he said. “And all this is supported by the west. Just as the west supports regular marches of neo-Nazis with swastikas, with symbols of divisions that were banned by the Nuremberg Tribunal and are recognised as criminal. The west supports all this.”
And that wasn’t the end of Lavrov’s dig at the west as he continued his attack later in the week, during his annual news conference in Moscow, when he claimed the United States had assembled a coalition of European countries to solve "the Russian question" in the same way that Adolf Hitler had sought a "final solution" to eradicate Europe's Jews.
"How dare he compare anything to the Holocaust, anything,” White House national security spokesman John Kirby responded. “Let alone a war that they started."
But what tends to be ignored by the mainstream media is that both sides in this conflict are acting according to the WEF strategy, with both Zelensky and Putin playing their parts in the New World Order campaign to destabilise international affairs to increase its hold over the world.
For the fat cats who descend on Davos in January, wars are nice little earners that allow them to foist their agendas on us while lining their pockets too.
Don’t be taken in by all the false rhetoric that fills the airwaves... US President Joe Biden, Zelensky and Putin are all on the same team and the losers in this game of deception are the people of Ukraine caught up in a WEF charade.
About the Creator
From Covid to the Ukraine and Gaza... nothing is as it seems in the world. Don't just accept the mainstream brainwashing, open your eyes to the bigger picture at the heart of these globalist agendas.
JOIN THE DOTS: http://wildaboutit.com