social media

The scoop on social media for influencers, lobbyists, budding politicians and civilians with a stake in the Swamp's trending issues.

What I Learned Growing Up in a Cult. Top Story - June 2025.
Earlier this week I was talking to a coworker about life. After a while, we somehow got on the subject of religion. I had to explain that I have an aversion to most organized forms of religion, having been raised in a church that at the time was very cult-like, and later after a split, the faction that stayed with the original leader went full cult. But that begs the question.
By Atomic Historianabout a year ago in The Swamp
Healing Through Cultural Disconnection and Reconnection
For many of us, culture is a quiet ache we carry. Not because we rejected it— but because we were pulled away from it. Sometimes by migration.
By Irfan Aliabout a year ago in The Swamp
NATO Summit in The Hague Signals Shift Toward Greater Defense Spending
has placed renewed emphasis on alliance unity, military readiness, and a significant increase in defense spending among member states. A Turning Point for NATO NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg opened the summit with an urgent call for greater resolve in the face of new and evolving global threats. “Our security environment is more unpredictable than ever,” he said. “Authoritarian regimes are challenging the rules-based international order. NATO must adapt—not tomorrow, but today.” The summit comes just weeks after coordinated U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian military targets in retaliation for Tehran’s alleged involvement in regional destabilization. The events reignited concerns over the alliance’s readiness for potential escalation in the Middle East and the possibility of broader global conflict. A Renewed Push for Defense Spending One of the clearest outcomes from the summit has been a recommitment to defense spending goals. Since the 2014 Wales Summit, NATO members have pledged to allocate at least 2% of their GDP to defense. While progress has been uneven, the latest events have accelerated urgency. Germany, France, Italy, and Spain—previously among those criticized for lagging behind—have all announced updated timelines to meet or exceed the 2% benchmark by 2027. In a major policy shift, Germany unveiled a €30 billion increase to its annual defense budget, with new investments in cyber defense, air mobility, and NATO’s rapid reaction forces. U.S. Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks, representing the Biden administration, applauded the movement. “America remains committed to NATO, but we must see fairer burden sharing. The security of the transatlantic alliance cannot rest on U.S. shoulders alone.” Alliance Cohesion Tested Despite strong rhetoric of unity, the summit revealed underlying concerns about alliance cohesion, particularly with looming elections in several NATO countries and shifting domestic attitudes toward defense priorities. Hungary and Slovakia have expressed reservations about increased troop commitments, citing economic pressures and political opposition at home. Meanwhile, Turkish President Erdoğan voiced frustrations over NATO’s stance on regional conflicts and criticized what he called “Western double standards” in Middle East policy. However, these tensions have not derailed the summit’s core goals. A joint communiqué issued Tuesday reaffirmed “unwavering solidarity” among members and outlined concrete steps to modernize NATO’s military posture, including: Establishing a new NATO Cyber Command Center based in Brussels Expanding rapid deployment capabilities with a proposed 300,000-strong high-readiness force Increasing joint exercises in the Baltic and Black Sea regions Enhancing intelligence-sharing protocols among members Geopolitical Ripple Effects Outside observers are closely watching how NATO’s moves will be interpreted by global rivals. Russia, though currently entangled in internal political turmoil and economic slowdown, responded harshly to the summit’s opening statements. A Kremlin spokesperson warned that NATO’s “aggressive expansion of military infrastructure” could “destabilize European security for decades.” China, while not directly addressed in the summit’s early briefings, looms large in NATO’s long-term strategic outlook. The alliance’s recent Strategic Concept document labeled Beijing as a “systemic challenge,” and this year’s discussions have included preliminary talks about expanding cooperation with Indo-Pacific partners such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Iran, the focal point of recent conflict, issued a statement through state media accusing NATO of “provoking regional instability through militarization and coercive diplomacy.” The regime has also increased military drills in the Persian Gulf and threatened to restrict access through the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could have significant global economic implications. Public Sentiment and Political Ramifications Back in Europe and North America, public support for NATO remains high, particularly in Eastern European countries like Poland, Estonia, and Romania, where the Russian threat feels most immediate. In Western Europe, however, opinions are more mixed. Recent polling by the European Policy Centre shows growing concern over the cost of defense increases, especially among younger voters more focused on climate and social issues. In the U.S., where presidential elections are just months away, NATO is again becoming a campaign issue. Former President Donald Trump, a prominent critic of the alliance during his tenure, has warned against “blank checks to Europe” and has suggested withdrawing troops unless burden-sharing improves. Analysts believe this dynamic could shape future U.S. involvement in NATO and have encouraged European members to take greater initiative in defense planning and procurement. Looking Forward: What Happens Next? While many of the summit’s announcements focus on long-term goals, there are immediate operational implications. NATO will begin a new round of joint military exercises in late July, including simulated cyberattacks, coordinated missile defense drills, and enhanced maritime patrols in the Mediterranean. The alliance is also set to release a classified review of its nuclear posture later this year, in response to Russia’s deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus and growing concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Stoltenberg concluded the summit with a message of cautious optimism: “NATO is not just a military alliance. It is a community of values. Today we have shown that even in uncertain times, we stand together—united, committed, and ready.” Conclusion The 2025 NATO summit in The Hague has reinforced the alliance’s strategic priorities amid rising global tensions. With defense spending on the rise and new military commitments on the table, NATO appears to be entering a phase of renewal. Yet the path ahead is not without challenges—from internal divisions to external threats. What is clear, however, is that the decisions made this week will shape the alliance’s trajectory for years to come. ---
By Shehzad Khanabout a year ago in The Swamp
U.S. Strikes Deal Blow to Iran’s Nuclear Program
Acording to multiple Western intelligence sources, the precision strikes have inflicted considerable damage on key facilities linked to Iran’s uranium enrichment infrastructure, setting back the country’s nuclear ambitions by several months. However, analysts caution that the disruption is likely temporary, and Iran retains the knowledge and capacity to resume its nuclear activities. Background: A Stealthy Escalation The operation, carried out in early June 2025, followed months of covert tensions and a steady rise in hostilities across the Middle East. The strikes, authorized after credible intelligence suggested Iran was accelerating enrichment activities beyond the levels permissible under the now-defunct 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), targeted underground centrifuge installations near Natanz and Fordow, as well as research facilities believed to be tied to weaponization efforts. The Pentagon has not officially disclosed the scope of the operation, but sources familiar with the mission report that a mix of stealth drones and long-range precision missiles were employed. The strikes reportedly avoided civilian areas and focused exclusively on military and nuclear-linked infrastructure. Intelligence Assessment: Progress Interrupted According to a classified intelligence briefing leaked to the press, U.S. analysts believe the attacks caused enough physical and technical damage to delay Iran’s nuclear enrichment timeline by 6 to 12 months. Satellite imagery released by independent research groups shows extensive structural damage at one of the centrifuge halls, and international nuclear inspectors from the IAEA were reportedly denied access to several affected facilities, raising suspicions of concealed impacts. One senior U.S. intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, stated: > “The operation achieved its tactical goals. Iran’s most advanced centrifuges have been destroyed or rendered inoperable, and critical support systems were disrupted. They will need time to rebuild—time we can use to reassess our diplomatic and strategic posture.” Iran’s Response: Defiance and Secrecy Iranian state media has confirmed that several military installations were “subject to foreign aggression,” but has not acknowledged the extent of the damage. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a televised speech days after the strikes, vowed that Iran would "respond forcefully to any act of sabotage" and accused the U.S. and its allies of attempting to suppress Iran's sovereign rights. In the days following the strike, Iran has increased air defense drills near sensitive sites and expelled several IAEA inspectors under the claim of "security violations." Tehran also moved key assets to undisclosed locations, further shrouding its nuclear activities in secrecy. Experts Warn: Knowledge Is Intact Despite the apparent success of the strikes in causing physical setbacks, nuclear non-proliferation experts warn that the most important aspect of Iran’s nuclear program—its scientific expertise—remains untouched. According to Dr. Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear policy expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies: > “Iran can rebuild what was lost. The real concern is not hardware—it’s know-how. Once you master the nuclear fuel cycle, you can’t bomb that knowledge out of existence.” Analysts emphasize that while infrastructure can be delayed, the momentum of Iran’s nuclear research community and the decentralized nature of its program make permanent rollbacks exceedingly difficult without a diplomatic solution. Diplomatic Fallout and Global Reactions The strikes have also reignited international tensions. Russia and China have condemned the U.S. action as unilateral and destabilizing, accusing Washington of undermining regional peace. European powers, while more measured in their response, have expressed concern about the consequences for non-proliferation efforts and the IAEA’s ability to monitor compliance. Israel, on the other hand, has openly praised the U.S. move. Prime Minister Yaakov Ben-David called the strikes a "necessary act of defense against an existential threat" and hinted that Israeli intelligence assisted in targeting decisions—though U.S. officials declined to confirm any collaboration. At the United Nations, the Security Council held an emergency session, but no consensus emerged on further action. A French-sponsored resolution calling for renewed diplomatic talks was blocked by both Russia and China. Regional Security Implications The immediate consequence of the strikes has been a marked increase in regional tension. U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria have been placed on high alert, and there have been multiple rocket and drone attacks on U.S.-aligned targets in the region, widely believed to be the work of Iran-backed militias. Oil prices have also seen significant fluctuations, reflecting market fears of a broader military confrontation in the Persian Gulf. Analysts warn that even a limited war between Iran and the U.S. or Israel could severely disrupt global energy supplies. Next Steps: Diplomacy or Escalation? With the Iranian nuclear program disrupted but not dismantled, the Biden administration faces a delicate balancing act. Domestically, the move has received bipartisan support, with many lawmakers praising the targeted nature of the strikes and calling for a firm stance against Iranian proliferation. However, some foreign policy experts are urging caution. Former U.S. diplomat Wendy Sherman stated: > “Military action can buy time, but it cannot provide a durable solution. We must use this window to re-engage diplomatically and build a stronger, multilateral framework.” There are also growing calls within Iran’s political establishment for withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a move that would trigger a full-blown nuclear crisis and strip away any remaining international oversight. Conclusion: A Pause, Not a Solution While the recent U.S. strikes have temporarily set back Iran’s nuclear program, the broader strategic challenge remains unresolved. The core of Iran’s capabilities—its scientific knowledge, its motivation, and its geopolitical leverage—endures. Without a return to meaningful diplomacy and a robust verification regime, Iran’s nuclear ambitions may only be delayed, not deterred. The next few months will be critical in determining whether the world edges closer to another cycle of confrontation or pivots toward a renewed path of negotiation. ---
By Big Storyabout a year ago in The Swamp
"The Iran-Israel Conflict: Assessing the Human and Financial Cost on Both Sides"
The Iran-Israel conflict, although not declared as a full-scale war, has taken a dangerous turn in recent years. Through cyber-attacks, proxy warfare, drone strikes, and missile attacks, both nations have inflicted serious damage on each other — directly and indirectly. This shadow war, largely played out across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and even international waters, has caused significant human, political, and financial losses. In this article, we will break down the consequences suffered by both Iran and Israel in this long-standing conflict, focusing on casualties, infrastructure damage, and the broader economic impact. --- Human Cost: Casualties and Psychological Impact One of the most tragic aspects of any conflict is the loss of human life. Although Iran and Israel have not faced each other directly on the battlefield in large-scale confrontations, both have experienced loss of life through indirect strikes, assassinations, and regional skirmishes. Iran’s Losses: Iran has suffered the deaths of several top military officials and scientists. One of the most high-profile cases was the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 by a U.S. drone strike — widely perceived as being in Israel’s interest, given Soleimani’s coordination with Hezbollah and other proxies hostile to Israel. Additionally, several nuclear scientists linked to Iran's nuclear program have been assassinated over the years. The most notable was Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, who was killed in 2020 in an ambush that Iran blamed directly on Israel. Iran has also lost hundreds of IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) personnel and affiliated militia fighters, especially in Syria and Iraq, where Israeli airstrikes have targeted Iranian military installations and weapons shipments. Israel’s Losses: Israel, while having more advanced defense systems like the Iron Dome and David’s Sling, has not been immune. Rocket attacks by Iranian-backed groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Islamic Jihad and Hamas in Gaza have led to the deaths of both civilians and soldiers. In the May 2021 Gaza conflict alone, more than 12 Israelis were killed, with hundreds injured. While Iran was not directly firing these rockets, it provided funding, arms, and ideological support to these groups. Moreover, the psychological toll on both populations — especially Israeli civilians living under constant threat of rocket attacks — has been immense. Mental health crises, PTSD, and social instability are long-term costs of these tensions. --- Financial and Economic Damage Iran’s Economic Losses: Iran’s economy has been under severe pressure due to international sanctions, especially after the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA (Iran Nuclear Deal) in 2018. However, the conflict with Israel has added further strain: Nuclear Facility Attacks: Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility was hit multiple times by what Tehran claims were Israeli cyber or sabotage operations. Rebuilding and securing these sensitive sites have cost Iran millions of dollars. Proxy Warfare Costs: Funding militias like Hezbollah, Houthis, and other regional actors costs Iran billions annually. A large portion of Iran’s military budget goes into sustaining these groups, reducing its ability to invest domestically. Cyber Attacks: Israeli cyberattacks have targeted Iran’s infrastructure, including oil terminals, transport systems, and banking networks. In retaliation, Iran has also targeted Israeli water facilities and other sectors. Investor Confidence: The ongoing hostilities have further deterred foreign investors and crippled tourism and trade prospects, especially in times when Iran desperately needs economic revival. Israel’s Economic Losses: Although Israel has a much stronger and diversified economy, it has not escaped economic consequences: Military Spending: The cost of maintaining a constant state of military readiness, including funding advanced missile defense systems, intelligence operations, and air force activity, consumes billions annually. Damage to Property: Rocket attacks have caused damage to homes, schools, factories, and public infrastructure. Each conflict flare-up costs the Israeli economy millions in insurance claims, reconstruction, and lost productivity. Tech and Cyber Disruption: Iran’s cyber retaliation has targeted Israeli transportation and banking systems. Although not always successful, these attacks require constant defense and system upgrades, which add to national expenditure. Tourism Decline: Every round of conflict leads to a dip in tourism, which is a vital part of Israel’s economy. Air travel disruptions, safety concerns, and international advisories harm revenue generation in this sector. --- Geopolitical Fallout and Long-Term Costs Both countries have suffered significant damage to their international reputation and regional standing due to their actions. Iran is increasingly isolated diplomatically, with even some of its traditional allies questioning its support for non-state armed groups. Israel faces growing international criticism over civilian casualties in Gaza and the West Bank, often linked to its security responses to Iranian-backed threats. Moreover, both nations are engaged in an arms race, particularly in the fields of drone warfare and cyber capabilities. The cost of this technological arms race is not only financial but also strategic, as each seeks to outdo the other in a race that has no clear end. --- Conclusion: The True Cost of Conflict While Iran and Israel may gain short-term tactical advantages through their actions, the long-term costs are mounting — economically, socially, and politically. Human lives have been lost, infrastructure damaged, and entire populations live under fear and instability. Without meaningful dialogue or third-party mediation, this shadow war is likely to continue, draining both nations of their resources and peace. For now, the Iran-Israel conflict remains a tragic example of how geopolitical rivalries can inflict deep scars on nations and their people — scars that may take generations to heal.Start writing...
By Big Storyabout a year ago in The Swamp
The Fear That Shapes Us
“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” — George Orwell e World on Edge It begins in silence. A mother turns off the news and looks at her child differently. A father locks the door, not from robbers, but from headlines. An elderly man walks past a newspaper stand and mutters, “They’re lying again.” All over the world—from the White House to West Bank, from Tehran to Tel Aviv, from Kashmir to Kyiv—fear has replaced logic. Power has replaced truth. And for many, the only real battlefield is the human mind. --- 🧠 Fear as a Political Weapon Fear is the most ancient, primal human response. But in the hands of modern politics, it has evolved into a silent psychological weapon. Governments no longer need bullets to dominate minds. They have talking heads, clickbait headlines, deepfakes, and carefully scripted press releases. Through them, fear becomes systematic—administered like medicine and justified like war. We are told to fear: The other religion. The immigrant. The foreign power. Our own freedom of thought. But what if the enemy is not across borders, but inside the broadcast? --- 🔁 The Psychological Cycle Psychologically, fear triggers fight, flight, or freeze. But in global affairs, it creates something worse: submissive obedience. The average citizen, overwhelmed and anxious, begins to: Distrust everything Avoid complex truth Seek refuge in simplified lies Justify inhumane actions in the name of safety That is how entire populations slowly begin to accept war as defense, censorship as order, and power as morality. --- 🏛️ Superpowers or Superpredators? Let’s be honest: The term “superpower” has lost its dignity. Once a symbol of stability and guidance, today it reminds us of: Proxy wars fought in poor countries Weapon sales in the name of peace Diplomacy used for economic bullying Alliances built on shared paranoia, not shared values Whether it’s America’s role in Ukraine, China's eye on Taiwan, or Israel’s actions in Gaza, we must ask ourselves: When does power become the enemy of humanity? --- 🪞 A Mirror to Our Own Minds This isn’t just geopolitics. It’s psychology. Each headline we read, each image of a bombing or protest, triggers something inside us. Some feel anger. Some feel numbness. Some feel guilt. But very few ask: Why do I feel this way? Here are a few reasons: Childhood trauma reawakened by images of suffering Groupthink that pushes us to echo what others say Cognitive dissonance when we support a cause that harms innocents Moral fatigue when we stop caring because caring hurts too much --- ⚖️ Truth Is Not Neutral Anymore “Stay neutral” is a lie told by those who benefit from imbalance. Neutrality, in the face of genocide, is not wisdom—it’s compliance. Silence, in the face of lies, is not peace—it’s permission. And apathy, in the face of global suffering, is not protection—it’s participation. We live in a time when morality has been hijacked by narratives. Where media houses sell you rage per click. Where empathy is algorithmically filtered. Where the victims are judged by their side of the map. --- 🌐 A Global Mind in Crisis Let’s zoom out: Humanity is not just at war with itself—it is at war with truth. And the battleground is your mind. Each day, you are being shaped. Each day, you are nudged closer to acceptance or resistance. Each day, you are choosing—consciously or unconsciously—between fear and understanding. So what will you choose today? --- 🔦 A Call to Mental Resistance It’s time we stopped looking at world affairs like sports. This is not “us vs them.” This is “truth vs illusion.” And the most dangerous weapon of the 21st century is not a nuclear bomb. It is a narrative. Let’s reclaim our minds. Question what you believe Ask where your beliefs come from Listen deeply to those who suffer And if you must take a side—choose the side of the voiceless --- 📣 Final Reflection History will not remember your Twitter debates. It will remember your silence when your voice could save lives. Truth is not just about facts—it’s about courage. And today, to seek truth is to resist. --- 🧩 Engage With Humanity, Not Headlines If this reflection sparked something in you, share it. Let’s rebuild the world, not with weapons, but with awareness. Your mind is not a battlefield. It is a seed. Water it with truth. ---
By Riaz Gillani Exclusiveabout a year ago in The Swamp
Oil price jumps after US strikes Iran
"A Deep Dive into Global Energy Markets": "Oil Price Jumps After US Strikes Iran" In a move that has sent shockwaves through global markets, the price of crude oil spiked following a series of military strikes carried out by the United States against Iranian targets. The escalation of tensions between two of the world's most influential oil-producing nations has led to uncertainty in the energy sector, with far-reaching implications for both oil prices and the broader geopolitical landscape.
By GLOBAL NEWSabout a year ago in The Swamp
us bombs iran
Washington, D.C., June 23, 2025 — In a stunning escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States confirmed a pre-dawn airstrike on Iran’s heavily fortified Fordow nuclear site, marking the most aggressive U.S. military action in the region since the 2020s. The bombing, dubbed “Operation Midnight Hammer,” was personally authorized by former President Donald Trump, who re-entered office amid a heated global security crisis.
By Saboor Brohi about a year ago in The Swamp
How to be A Ventriloquist’s Mouthpiece for War-Mongering Propaganda.
Because having absolutely no idea what you're talking about has never stopped you before. Why start now? STEP ONE: ANNOUNCE YOUR EXPERTISE
By River and Celia in Underlandabout a year ago in The Swamp
PACO Calling TACO - 1
This conversation happened on June 14, 2025, Trump's birthday, before his Big Beautiful Birthday parade. "Hello, Donnie?" "Yes, Vlad, who else would it be?" [sounds grumpy]
By Lana V Lynxabout a year ago in The Swamp
💔 Tragedy Above Ahmedabad: Air India Flight 171 Crash
On the afternoon of June 12, 2025, Air India Flight AI‑171—a Boeing 787‑8 Dreamliner—suffered a catastrophic fate just 30 seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad, heading to London’s Gatwick. With 230 passengers and 12 crew onboard, the aircraft tragically plunged into the BJ Medical College hostel, claiming 241 lives and causing at least 28 ground fatalities among on-campus residents . A horrific scene: eyewitnesses described the impact as “like an earthquake,” followed by a deafening roar . --- 🕯️ The Lone Survivor In the wreckage emerged a glimmer of hope: one survivor, identified as British–Indian national Vishwashkumar Ramesh, seated in row 11A. Miraculously, he emerged relatively unscathed and is now receiving medical care—walking away on foot from debris captured on video . --- 📊 Who Was Onboard Of the 242 souls aboard: 169 Indians 53 British nationals 7 Portuguese 1 Canadian 12 cabin crew and 2 pilots . Notably among the dead was former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani, along with several students and even a travel influencer—depth and diversity spanning the global Indian diaspora . --- 🔧 What Went Wrong? Preliminary reports from Flightradar24 show the Boeing reached merely 625 ft before losing contact and issuing a mayday that wasn’t answered . Investigator notes highlighted: The landing gear was reportedly barely retracting, suggesting a mechanical malfunction . Experts pointed to possible post-pandemic pilot training gaps, overburdened air traffic control, and factory standard erosion . This marks the first hull loss of a Boeing 787 since its 2011 debut—a major aviation industry shock . --- 🌍 Ripple Effects & Investigation The black box has been recovered, with US NTSB and UK investigators joining Indian authorities to determine the cause . Boeing has pledged full cooperation, while Air India and its parent, the Tata Group, work closely with investigators, offering assistance to victims’ families . Facing a potential historic insurance claim, analysts predict this catastrophe could rival or exceed prior records . --- 🕊️ A Nation in Mourning India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, expressed deep grief, and condolence messages poured in from around the world. This has sparked a nationwide conversation on aviation safety standards, especially amid growing concerns about pilot readiness and systemic vulnerabilities . --- 🔍 What Comes Next Full technical investigations are underway—watch for official DGCA, NTSB, and AAIB reports. Air India and Boeing may need to reassess safety protocols, training, and manufacturer oversight. Families and survivors will look to fair, transparent compensation and justice—not only for those lost onboard, but also for ground victims. --- In Reflection The AI-171 crash forces us to confront the intersection of technology, human error, and institutional preparedness. The Dreamliner’s first fatal catastrophe in over a decade underscores how even the most advanced aircraft remain vulnerable. As the probe unfolds, it’s clear that lessons learned could reshape aviation safety—not just in India, but worldwide. Let us remember the souls aboard—passengers, crew, and ground victims—with empathy and respect. And support those left behind as they seek answers and healing.
By GadgetGroundabout a year ago in The Swamp
Bitcoin vs Open Interest Should traders be worried by THIS divergence
The price action of Bitcoin has recently been scrutinized, but savvy traders are also paying attention to something even more telling: a significant divergence between open interest in Bitcoin and its price. The derivatives market may be sending a cautious signal while the spot market maintains its optimism. Analysts are concerned about this divergence, which raises the question of whether traders should be concerned. Understanding what open interest actually entails is essential before delving into its ramifications. The total number of unresolved derivative contracts in the futures and options markets is referred to as open interest. It shows how much activity and participation there is in the market. An increase in open interest typically suggests that new money is flowing into the market, which can reinforce a trend. A decline could indicate that traders are closing positions, which could indicate indecisiveness or exhaustion of the trend. The price of Bitcoin has been either steady or showing signs of rising, hovering in bullish territory above key support levels in recent weeks. However, open interest in Bitcoin futures has not followed suit. In fact, in several instances, open interest has dropped or stagnated while prices climbed—a classic divergence.
By GLOBAL NEWSabout a year ago in The Swamp