Assassination, Deceit, and Deception

by Dr. Williams 8 months ago in corruption

The Act of 1871

Assassination, Deceit, and Deception

What does the United States stand for today? The ideals that America was founded on were never before combined ... Liberty, justice, education, and morality these four basic principles were the basis that our democracy was founded on. But, in 1871 our core principles were basically stripped away by treasonous acts by our very own Congress. There have been many scholars who question the validity of what the Act of 1871 did to the United States. Yet, there is undeniable truth that the Act of 1871 was a direct result of the money changers influence on Congress to deceive the American public. Too many of us ever since 1871 haven't realized that our own government has been a Corporation created by the Act of 1871. Reference to Art. 1, 8, cl. 17. firmly stipulates that the government of the United States turned into a Corporation where citizens rights became privileges. This act turned a nation of sovereign individuals into a nation of servitude. One has to wonder why the American public have been deceived and oblivious to what our own government has done and continues to do to the American public.

To fully understand the magnitude of deception, lies, and outright fraud of a treasonous act perpetrated on the American public is to retrace how and why Congress was so inclined to pass the Act of 1871. The year was 1860 Abraham Lincoln just became President and the Union was on the verge of the great Civil War. One of the darkest periods in our nations history was just beginning. But, that was not really the start of the nations troubles. Back when Andrew Jackson stopped the charter for the Bank of America was the beginning of one of the greatest financial grabs in history. We have to remember that soon afterward there was an assassination attempt on Andrew Jackson. Some point out that the attempt was because Jackson refused the Bank of Americas charter.

In 1863 Junius Morgan who was already established with George Peabody and Company a London based Merchant Bank which was associated with the Rothschild's Bank Of England opened up the New York office of J.S. Morgan. With combined offices in London and in New York J.S. Morgan became one of the most influential financial institutions in the United States. Together with the Bank of New York they continued to loan money with interest to the Government of the United States.

The European bankers namely the Rothschild's realized that the United States was an emerging financial opportunity. But, in order gain a foothold to control the currency of the United States they had to create a way that the U.S. was so in debt it had no choice but to go the the Bank of England and the Rothschild's for much needed loans. In 1860, England was sympathetic to the Southern cause. The increased tensions between the North and South finally reached the point of no return and hostilities finally erupted sending the United States into the most horrific civil war. Many point out that the Civil War was more about financial control by the Rothschild's and the Morgans than it was about freeing the slaves.

For Abraham Lincoln though, his troubles and the nations began almost from the time he took office. By 1862 congress repealed the flat tax and instead established what was to become the basis of the complex tax system that we have today. A more progressive tax structure putting more of a burden on the less wealthy. Another set back was the National Bank Act of 1862. This act let banks become national in that they are charted by the Federal Government and authorized to issue interest bearing notes secured by Government bonds similar to what Alexander Hamilton did after the Revolutionary War in the creation of the First Bank of America. Passage of this bill ensured a market for the Federal Debt since the new National Banks would now be required to buy those bonds. The National Bank Act meant that the U.S. money supply would be from then on created out of debt.

Had the National Bank Act failed to pass, Congress would have benefited the American public in a time of great uncertainty. Look what happened in 2008 with the Federal Reserve Bank running the show. Millions of our citizens suffered great financial loss. All the Federal Reserve does is loan money to the government at interest. What drives up our national debt higher are privately owned banks, the Federal Reserve, and a nation that continues to be engaged in armed conflicts anywhere in the world. It was Lincoln that stressed "Money is a creature of Law and the original issue should be maintained by the exclusive monopoly of national government. the Government should stand behind it's currency, credit, and bank deposits of this nation. No individual should suffer a loss of money through depreciation or inflated currency or bank bankruptcy;"

The London Times in 1863 who favored the Bank of England's monetary policies wrote, "If that mischievous financial policy, which had it's origin in the North American Republic, should become indurate down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish it's own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized government of the world. The brains and the wealth of all the countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." The wealth of the United States is in the hands of the private bankers not the American public. It is no wonder that the English were trying to help the Confederacy. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 the British populace quietly withdrew their support of the Confederacy while Russia grew more supportive of the Union cause which helped the North and Lincoln preserve the Union.

Repealing the greenback law and passage of the National Bank Act meant that all national banks were to be privately owned and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest bearing. The National Bank Act also provided that the greenbacks be returned as soon as possible as they came back in the payment of taxes. A hundred years later the United States Treasury Department computed the amount of interest that would have been paid if 400 million dollars would have been borrowed at interest instead of being issued by the Treasury Department as Abraham Lincoln initially did. Because of the greenback resolution the United States Government saved $4 billion in interest. President Lincoln followed the exact interpretation of the United States Constitution by the government creating its own money interest free.

In 1864 Lincoln's opposition to the central banks financial control is well documented. He knew the dangers of what money loaned to the government with interest would have on the overall economy. The plot to assassinate Lincoln revolved around the fact that the high financiers couldn't gain complete control of monetary policy with Lincoln as President. Had Lincoln lived he would have done what Andrew Jackson did and eliminate the national banks monopoly. When history tells about the tragic death of Abraham Lincoln they fail to explain that the money changers like the Rothschild's the Morgan's etc. desperately wanted to gain access to Americas monetary policies. Though no direct involvement in Lincoln's assassination by the Rothschild's or Morgan's was ever substantiated one cannot help think that others acting on their behalf and theirs had devised the plot to eliminate Lincoln and Andrew Johnson.

It was right after the civil War that the Bank of England and other European Bankers convinced or should we say bribed members of Congress that the Constitutional monetary system that Lincoln briefly used would not be in the nations best interest. So in 1866 Congress passed the Contraction Act and recalled all the Greenbacks that Lincoln put in circulation. Congress with the full cooperation of the financial institutions like the Bank of New York or J.S. Morgan gave the American public the false impression they would be better off using the gold standard the banks used to control the swings of economic instability. All they did was call in existing loans refused to issue new ones which caused the depression of the late 1860's.

By now the major banks realized the importance of the media in securing the further advancement of their control over the U.S. economy. They spread the word that the lack of a single gold standard was the cause of the depression all the while used the Contraction Act to lower the amount of money in circulation. In 1866 there was $1.8 billion in circulation and by 1871 there was only less than $.5 billion. In truth when many economists tell the American public that recessions and depressions are part of the natural flow of economies the money supply continues to be controlled by a very small select few that have always done so and will continue to do so if we let them.

By 1871 the United States was cash strapped. Needed funds for the debts of the Civil War and needed to reverse the downward spiral of the continuing economic troubles. The Bank of England would only lend the much needed funds if Congress passed the Act of 1871. We have to point out that in 1787 the "Constitution for the United States of America" was signed. In 1871 under the Act of 1871 the original Constitution was changed to "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" To this day, the American public have been deceived into thinking that THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was the original. In truth, the original constitution that guaranteed our freedoms and inherent rights was suddenly stripped away by what Congress did when they fell in bed with the European bankers and signed our freedoms away with the creation of the Act of 1871.

The Act of 1871 created a city state called the District of Columbia in the heart of Washington. In creation of this district an independent Constitution was conceived. That is the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA that to this day is recognized as the original. But, it is not. With the passage of the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was change by the word of that replaced the word for. The corporation called THE UNITED STATES now was owned by European bankers. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THE UNITED STATES INC. now operates in an economic capacity and has ever since duped the public into thinking it governs the republic.

When letters are capitalized it is very significant when one refers to a legal document. This alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What our Congress did in 1871 was create an entirely new constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government which only benefits the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. What this means is that ever since 1871 instead of having absolute and unalienable rights that were guaranteed under the original Constitution, we the people those rights have turned into privileges. A good example is the sovereign right to travel which under corporate policy means that right is now turned into a privilege which requires one to be licensed. The passage of the Act of 1871 Congress did in fact commit treason against the people of the United States who were sovereign under the grants and decrees of the organic Constitution.

In 1872, Ernest Seyd from the Bank of England bribed members of Congress into stop the minting of Silver. The Coinage Act passed by Congress effectively stopped the circulation of silver coins and by 1873 gold was the only form of coin money used. By 1876, with over 30 percent of the work force unemployed the American public realized that silver backed money and greenbacks were essential to ease the economic recession the country was in. We again have to realize the lessons learned from history. Without money civilization could not have had a beginning and with a diminishing supply it will languish in desperation and unless relieved civilization as we know it will perish.

In 1877, the country was immersed in another recession where riots broke out all over the country. The banks response to this crisis was to do nothing. Meanwhile James Buel the American Bankers Association Secretary wrote fellow members of the Bankers Association, "It is advisable to do all in your power to oppose the greenback issue of paper money and withhold patronage from all applicants who are not willing to oppose the government issue of money. To repeal the Act creating bank notes or to restore to circulation the government issue of money will seriously affect our individual profits as bankers and lenders." With that letter he convinced members of congress to oppose any attempt to government issue of currency.

When James Garfield became President in 1881, he realized that whoever controls the volume of money in any country controls its industry and commerce. When Garfield publicly stated his opposition to what the banks continue to do and state that the entire monetary system is controlled by a few within a week Garfield was assassinated.

The Act of 1871 had and continues to have serious implications not only on the individual citizens whose rights were stripped away, but on the lives that could have made a huge difference in the daily lives of an deceived public but were taken away by conspirators who showed no remorse in keeping the money changers strangle hold over a depressed nation. In 1963 President Kennedy who like Jackson, Lincoln and Garfield realized the dangers the money changers possessed became another victim of the length the money changers will go to keep their tight grip on a nation. In 2012, there was an attempt to repeal the Act of 1871 but, the tight grip of current monetary policies prevented the attempt from ever making it out of committee. Remember, if we let them! The money changers will continue to thwart any attempt to change the status-quo.

corruption
Read next: New Mexico—It's like a State, like All the Others!
Dr. Williams

A PhD in Economics. Author of National Economic Reform's Ten Articles of Confederation.

See all posts by Dr. Williams