Tom Hanks Cautions of Dental Promotion Utilizing A.I. Rendition of Him
Tom Hanks alerts the public to an impersonation of him in a dental advertisement.
Mr. Hanks and the CBS anchor Gayle Ruler both said their resemblances were utilized in unapproved ads, as stresses have developed over the unregulated utilization of man-made reasoning.
Both Tom Hanks and Gayle King, a co-host of "CBS Mornings," have independently alerted their social media followers that videos with fake adverts have likenesses of them created by artificial intelligence.
"People keep sending me this video and asking about this product, and I have NOTHING to do with this company," Ms. King said on Instagram on Monday, attaching a video that she claimed had been altered from a genuine post advertising her radio program on August 31.
The doctored footage, which she shared with the words "Fake Video" imprinted on it, depicted Ms. King stating that her direct messages were "overflowing" and advised individuals to "follow the link" for more information about her undisclosed weight loss "secret."
"I have never come across or utilized this product!" she expressed. "Please do not be deceived by these AI-generated videos."
The specific weight-loss product being advertised and the associated company responsible for it were not immediately discernible.
On Saturday, Mr. Hanks also cautioned about a misleading advertisement for a dental plan that unlawfully employed his likeness. He revealed that the advertisement was counterfeit, created using an artificial intelligence rendition of himself.
"Be careful!!" he composed on Instagram over a screen shot of the obvious promotion. "There's a video out there advancing some dental arrangement with a simulated intelligence rendition of me. I don't have anything to do with it."
It muddled organization had utilized Mr. Hanks' resemblance or what items it was advancing. Mr. Hanks didn't label the organization or notice it by name. There was no proof of the video anyplace via online entertainment.
On Monday, inquiries regarding the commercial, including if Mr. Hanks intended to pursue legal action or if he had asked for the ad to be taken down from social media, were met with silence by Mr. Hanks' representatives.
In an email, a representative from Meta, the parent company of Instagram, refrained from providing specific comments about the advertisements. However, they emphasized that running deceptive ads exploiting public figures to defraud individuals out of their money goes against their established policies.
The spokesman stated, "Considerable resources have been dedicated to addressing these types of ads, leading to significant enhancements in our enforcement measures. This includes the suspension and deletion of accounts, pages, and ads that contravene our policies."
Christa Robinson, a representative for CBS News, said in an email that Ms. Ruler found out about the video highlighting her resemblance when companions pointed out her it. "Agents for her sake have mentioned the phony video be brought down a few times," Ms. Robinson said.
The utilization of A.I. proved to be a significant area of contention throughout the extended strike conducted by the Writers Guild of America, which concluded in the previous month.
In order to assuage the concerns of the guild regarding A.I. and the ownership of old scripts by studios, legal representatives for the entertainment companies devised specific language. Similarly, SAG-AFTRA, the union representing actors in the Hollywood industry, has also voiced apprehension about A.I. It is apprehensive that this technology may enable the creation of digital replicas of actors without appropriate compensation or authorization.
Mr. Hanks talked about the utilization of A.I. finally recently, only days before the Hollywood essayists' strike started. He said on "The Adam Buxton Web recording" that he originally utilized comparable innovation on the film "Polar Express," which was delivered in 2004.
"We saw this coming," he said. "We saw that there would have been this capacity to take zeros and ones inside a PC and transform it into a face and a person. Since has just grown a billion-crease from that point forward, and we see it all over the place."
Mr. Hanks claimed that the legal implications of an actor claiming ownership of their voice and face as intellectual property were being discussed by guilds, agencies, and law firms.
He considered the possibility of pitching a run of 32-year-old movies that would feature him. With the help of artificial intelligence or deep-fake technologies, "anyone can now recreate themselves at any age," he claimed.
"I could be hit by a transport tomorrow, and that is all there is to it, yet exhibitions can go on," he said. "Also, beyond the comprehension that it's been finished with A.I. or on the other hand profound phony, there'll not be anything to let you know that it's not me and me alone. Furthermore, having some level of exact quality is going. That is positively a creative test, but at the same time it's a lawful one."
As artificial intelligence (A.I.) gains ground in different manifestations and companies venture into its experimentation, apprehensions arise regarding the handling of confidential data, the precision of A.I.-generated responses, and the potential misuse of this technology by criminals.
At present, the situation is characterized by an abundance of queries rather than solutions. During the summer, policy experts and legislators indicated that the United States is embarking on a possibly protracted and challenging journey towards establishing regulations governing A.I.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Abdulah Al Emran and writers in Lifehack and other communities.
Was 'The Creator' Written by AI?
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a cultural symbol of fear and uncertainty in 2023. It is seen as the ghost in the machine that threatens to replace or replicate humanity's worst qualities. Musicians, writers, and artists worry about AI's ability to mimic their voices, which may dilute their originality and flood the world with countless fakes. The entertainment industry, represented by organizations like the WGA and SAG-AFTRA, have made the perils of embracing or ignoring AI a central focus of their protests. The future is here, and its dystopian implications are unmistakable.
By Abdulah Al Emran2 months ago in Lifehack
Which is better for you: "Real" meat or "fake" meat?
In 2021, a survey of more than 1,000 Americans found that nearly two-thirds had eaten some form of plant-based food in the past year. Many cited the health and environmental benefits as motivation. But are these types of foods better for us and the planet? First, let's introduce the contestants. Meat from slaughtered animals, called forage, has a complex structure consisting of muscle fibers, connective tissue, and fat. You may recognize it from its role in the human diet, dating back to the origins of our species. Our next challengers are the plant-based varieties, which look and taste like meat, but are made from protein, carbohydrates, fats and other plant molecules. Converting plant molecules into something flesh-like takes a lot of effort. The grain of beef is made up of long, stick-like proteins. To model this structure, global proteins can be pushed through an extruder and forced to unravel and join together into long filaments. To mimic animal fats, companies combine fats and oils derived from plants. One popular brand adds colored beet juice that changes the color of the patty as it cooks. Others added an iron molecule called heme, which their team says is key to the food's flavor. There are many types of results. Finally, our final ingredient: lab-grown beef. Also known as stem-cell and cultured beef, these products start with animal stem cells that researchers force to reproduce and build muscle. It should be noted that most lab-grown beef is still in the development phase, so the exact process may vary when it is produced on a larger commercial scale. So which type of meat or similar meat is best for your health? Raised beef is an important source of many proteins and human nutrients. But researchers also found a link between red and processed foods and health problems such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. A 2012 study concluded that replacing red meat with other foods, such as chicken, beans or peas, in one meal a day reduced the risk of heart disease. by 7 to 19 percent. There is too little data to know if replacing red meat with plant-based bread has the same effect. Plant-grown beef, while having the same amount of protein, calories and iron as farmed beef, is highly processed meat that is high in sodium. Most of them are in coconut oil, which is high in saturated fat and, like red meat, increases the risk of heart disease. At the same time, lab-grown beef can provide the same nutritional benefits and health risks as farmed meat. But we are not sure how to progress product development. So which competitor is better for the environment? The livestock industry is estimated to be responsible for 14.5% of human greenhouse gas emissions. Researchers report that producing plant-based foods produces an average of 90% less greenhouse gas emissions than beef, 63% less than pork, and 51% less less than a chicken. Plant-based crops require less land and water than conventional crops. It produces very little of the pollutants that run off from farms and waterways, posing a threat to the environment and public health. For lab-grown beef, the industry currently harvests stem cells from animal muscle tissue. But in order to increase the production, how many animals are needed to make these biodiesel? It is not clear to what extent alternative foods will reduce the environmental impact of the farmed food industry. What if, instead of replacing food with others, people continued to eat large amounts of organic foods while eating new options? While there's no real way to know which is the best diet, if you're concerned about your personal impact on animal welfare, public health, and the environment, plant-based foods may be at the top of the list. Switching to a different diet is not an all-or-nothing decision. In fact, a 2022 study suggested that cutting red meat to just one serving per day could reduce a person's dietary carbon footprint by 48%.
By Rowan Sharkawy6 days ago in Lifehack
Are you struggling to lose weight? It's not your fault!
One of the biggest areas I have noticed that most people do not pay attention too when struggling to lose weight is their liver function, crazy right! Speaking to most of the people who I have trained, putting in countless time in the gym and diet after diet but not seeing the results they wanted, so I started to do research to see if there was anything I can do to help further their progress.
By Rafael Aponte6 days ago in Lifehack
Comments (1)
Great work! Fantastic job!