Journal logo

Why Are Our Capitalist Overlords Scared of Remote Work?

Maybe it's because we finally have the power - and we're not giving it up easily.

By Paige HollowayPublished 4 months ago 5 min read
© Image created with AI; Paige Holloway assumes responsibility for the provenance and copyright.

If there was ever a canary in the coal mine of our industrial era, a small, nagging sign of an impending shift in the grand order of things, it was the pandemic-induced remote work revolution. A mere blip in the history of work itself, this sudden transition sent shockwaves through corporate echelons, challenging long-standing norms and rattling the pillars of capitalism.

You see, work - as we know it - has always been about power dynamics. The offices towering over our city skylines, the grueling 9-to-5 grind, the rigid hierarchical structures - they're all masterfully orchestrated elements of a system designed to concentrate power at the top. And therein lies the crux of the capitalist overlord's fear: the power to control work, to define productivity, and to dictate how, where, and when work should be done has slipped from their hands.

The Pandemic - A Wake-Up Call

For many, the pandemic was a wake-up call. It laid bare the stark inequalities that run deep in our society and forced us to confront the reality of what really matters in life - family, community, health, and well-being. For the first time, many workers had a taste of what work-life balance could actually look like. With remote work, the often ignored boundaries between personal and professional life were suddenly within our grasp to redefine.

A shift was observed, a shift that signaled a collective awakening of the workforce. Amid the chaos, a realization dawned - work doesn't have to be the centerpiece of our lives; instead, it can fit comfortably around what truly matters. This newfound autonomy has been a catalyst for change and a beacon of hope for workers worldwide.

But for the capitalist overlords, this was a worrying sign. It signaled the potential of an empowered workforce that valued quality of life over blind loyalty to corporate interests. It threatened the traditional mechanisms of control that kept the capitalist machine humming.

The Morality of Work and the Case of Elon Musk

Enter Elon Musk, the quintessential capitalist overlord. In his controversial argument against remote work, he brings up the issue of morality, criticizing remote workers for enjoying the flexibility and safety of home while others must physically toil. But does this really constitute a moral failing on the part of remote workers, or is it merely an attempt to shift the blame?

One might argue that the real moral quandary lies within the realm of income inequality. For instance, Musk earns a staggering 1.6 million times more than the average Tesla employee (Bivens & Mishel, 2015). And yet, he chastises remote workers for what he perceives as an imbalance. If morality is the lens through which we are viewing this issue, it's crucial to take a holistic view and question where the real imbalance lies.

It's not just about the morality of work but about the morality of wealth distribution and the power dynamics inherent in our capitalist system. The implication that remote workers are somehow morally inferior for taking advantage of technological advancements that allow them to work flexibly smacks of hypocrisy.

The Connection Conundrum and Malcolm Gladwell

Then we have Malcolm Gladwell, the renowned author who argues that the office is the best place for connection. While connection is indeed vital, the question arises - why should our most profound connections be limited to our workplaces?

Our need for connection is innately human. But is it fair to expect workers to fulfill this essential need primarily through interactions with colleagues and superiors? It seems like another con-job that corporate forces are perpetuating - defining where and how meaningful connections should be made. When you think about it, doesn't it sound eerily similar to the old playbook of controlling where, when, and how work is done?

Perhaps what's more concerning about Gladwell's position is the underlying notion that we should be segregating our lives in the name of employment. This perspective might be more detrimental to our collective well-being than we realize. It's worth asking: Is Gladwell simply reinforcing an archaic model that serves capitalist interests more than the human need for holistic well-being?

What's more, Gladwell's assertion is based on the premise that remote work leads to weak connections at work. However, research has shown that remote workers often have stronger, more meaningful relationships with their colleagues precisely because they have to make more of an effort to communicate effectively and connect on a personal level (Bloom et al., 2015).

The Power Shift

In the final analysis, what seems to unsettle the capitalist overlords isn't the morality of remote work or the purported lack of connection. Rather, it's the shift of power that the remote work revolution signifies. The narrative that workers need to be physically present in the office to be productive or to form meaningful connections is a part of the control mechanism that has been integral to traditional capitalism.

Remote work has revealed to us a different way - a way where we can control our work-life balance, define our productivity, and choose how and where to make our connections. It has provided us with the autonomy that has been lacking in traditional work structures. And once we've tasted that autonomy, it isn't easy to give it up.

The capitalist overlords may not like it, but the remote work revolution isn't about escaping responsibilities or shirking work. It's about claiming power - power over our lives, our choices, and our happiness. And that's a power that we're not ready to surrender.


Bivens, J., & Mishel, L. (2015). Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivity and a Typical Worker's Pay: Why It Matters and Why It's Real. Economic Policy Institute.

Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. (2023). Elon Musk Says Remote Work is 'Morally Wrong' and Malcolm Gladwell is Right to Criticize Remote Work.


About the Creator

Paige Holloway

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2023 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.