What the Water Asks of You
It's legal for women to be topless in Canada. I swim at night to be considerate. The cops still showed up.

There is a particular quality to a lake at night that's difficult to describe to someone who hasn't experienced it. The cold hits you in a specific sequence — ankles first, then thighs, then the sharp intake of breath when it reaches your torso — and then something shifts, and the cold becomes simply the temperature of the world, and you stop registering it as something to endure. The stars overhead are different out here than they are anywhere with streetlights. The water is dark and very still at that hour, and when you lie on your back and let it hold you, the sound changes too: muffled, interior, the particular silence of being almost completely submerged.
I live in a small town in rural Canada, set back from a public beach that isn't much — a boat ramp, a stretch of sand, the lake beyond it. No lifeguard, no operating hours, no posted rules about when you can or can't be there. I've been going at night for years, mostly because I prefer to swim without an audience, and partly because my preferred state for swimming is without clothes at all.
I don't fully strip at a public beach. I understand that a nude stranger in the water isn't everyone's preference, and I don't want to make that someone else's problem. So I compromise: I go topless. This is legal in Canada — has been for decades, in every province, without meaningful exception. I know this not because I researched it for this situation, but because it's simply true, the same way other rights are true without requiring research to exercise them.
The beach is reliably empty after dark. I go, I swim, I float on my back with the stars overhead and the water holding my weight, and I feel, in the specific way that only certain moments allow, entirely like myself.
A few weeks ago I saw some teenagers cycling on the road that runs beside the beach. They were far enough away that it registered as ordinary — kids on bikes in summer, nothing remarkable. I didn't think about them afterward. I kept swimming.
The next day, police came to my door.
Two officers. They had the particular energy of people who have been asked to do something they find slightly embarrassing but are obligated to follow through on anyway. Someone had complained — a teenager had told a parent, or someone passing had seen me, the exact chain was never clarified. The officers explained that neighbors had raised a concern. They asked if I would consider not swimming topless anymore.
I told them I'd think about it.
They thanked me and left. The whole thing lasted maybe ten minutes and had the atmosphere of a conversation everyone involved knew was on shaky ground. They didn't cite any law, because there is no law to cite. They were enforcing a preference, dressed up as a request, delivered by uniformed officers to lend it a weight it didn't legally have.
I've been sitting with it since. Not with guilt, exactly, but with a kind of alert attention — the feeling of watching something reveal itself.
The mechanism here is familiar even if this instance of it is minor: a woman's body in its natural state creates discomfort in observers, and that discomfort is treated as her responsibility to resolve. I chose night hours specifically to avoid conflict. I stopped short of what I'd actually prefer — full nudity — out of consideration for other people's sensibilities. I made accommodations. And still the response was a police visit, a request with the weight of authority behind it, an implied suggestion that my legal exercise of a legal right was something to reconsider.
I won't pretend the spite isn't there. There's a version of me that wants to lay out on that beach in full afternoon sunlight just to see what happens next. Whether that impulse is wisdom or pettiness I honestly can't tell.
What I keep returning to is the gap. Not the gap between what I did and what's legal — that gap doesn't exist, the law is clear. The gap between what's permitted and what the community will actually allow, between rights that exist on paper and rights that exist in practice, between a woman saying "I'll think about it" to a police officer and genuinely having to think about it, because the social cost of exercising a right can be real even when the legal standing isn't in question.
I don't think I'm the asshole. I'm also not certain that matters.
Whose comfort, exactly, is supposed to govern what a woman does with her own body in a public space where she's breaking no law — and how did that ever become a question the police should be answering?
About the Creator
Bertyl Kently
Personal essays about family, boundaries, and the moments that shape us
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.