I Make $20K a Month. Here's Why I Still Felt Empty.
My salary covered rent, food, and everything else. It couldn't answer the one question that mattered.

Friday, 10 p.m. The salary notification pops up. Twenty-three thousand yuan, eight hundred more than last month thanks to a performance bonus. You stare at the screen for three seconds, put the phone face down on the table, and go back to your bowl of noodles, already soggy. Outside, someone walks a dog. The leash drags on the ground; the owner scrolls on his phone. You think: Will next Friday be the same? And the Friday after that?
You don't dwell on it. Once you start, it's easy to slide into the big question: Why are we alive at all? And once that question shows up, the next day at work becomes harder to get through. So you push it back down, wash the dishes, open a streaming site, watch two episodes of a variety show, and go to sleep. Monday, back to normal.
But the question doesn't disappear. It changes its face after you've secured food and shelter, and quietly sits down across from you again.
1. Your Needs Moved Up. That's All.
A 20K monthly salary in most cities covers rent, food, and occasionally a trip. Physiological needs and safety needs are basically handled. In Maslow's terms, the crisis at the bottom is over.
Maslow's theory is often simplified into a rigid ladder, as if you must climb one rung at a time. Here's the thing: when lower-level needs stop being a crisis, they stop being the main source of motivation. Not worrying about next month's rent doesn't automatically mean you feel alive. The question you've been suppressing with "I'll think about it after I make more money" comes knocking again.
Feeling that life is meaningless isn't pretentious or ungrateful. It's a normal signal that your needs have moved up a level. Your psychological system is telling you: the rice bowl is stable now. It's time to ask something else.
No one ever taught you what that something else is.
2. Work Gives You a Salary. It May Be Draining Three Things.
Many people try to put meaning into work, as if finding a "job with a sense of mission" will automatically give life an answer. In reality, only a very small number of people find work that fits their soul. For most, work is first and foremost a way to make a living. There's no shame in that. Work has always been a tool.
The problem: when a job gives you only a salary for a long time, and not three other things, a person slowly burns out. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) lays out those three things clearly: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Autonomy is "I am the subject of my actions, not a tool being controlled." It doesn't mean you decide everything yourself. It means you feel your actions come from your own will. You have choices, a sense of control, and responsibility for results. The workplace scenes that damage autonomy are probably familiar: the proposal gets revised seven times, and the leader says to go back to the first version; you make a suggestion, and the response is "Just do it the way I said for now"; you finally get into flow, and a last-minute meeting drags you away. The salary isn't low, but you're pushed along every day. The longer it goes on, the more suffocated you feel.
Competence is "I can do things well, and I can feel growth and value." It doesn't mean succeeding all the time. It means that when you do well, someone sees it; when you make a mistake, you get guidance rather than only blame. What drains competence is years of odd jobs, unreasonable KPIs, having your work claimed by someone else, and receiving only criticism with no recognition. After a year, your annual summary can't fill three lines, because every item is "assisted with," "coordinated with," or "supported." You start to suspect you can't do anything well, and eventually you just coast.
Relatedness is "I am respected, accepted, and connected to others in a positive way." It doesn't require you to be friends with every colleague. It means basic respect, support, and fairness. What drains relatedness is office politics, a boss who uses PUA tactics, colleagues who pass the blame, and group chats where your message gets no reply. The interpersonal friction drains more than the work itself. You sit at your desk, do nothing, and you're already tired.
When work consistently provides these three things, people gradually shift from "working for the salary" to "willing to work." Conversely, when all three needs are chronically overdrawn, people slide from "I don't want to work" to "I can't work anymore," and finally into a numb state of exhaustion. When you feel life is meaningless, look at what your psychological system is signaling: this place has long been short on autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
3. "Meaninglessness" Is Three Smaller Gaps.
"Life is meaningless" sounds huge, but it can be broken down. It's often a combination of three shortages: not knowing where to go (a lack of direction), life not making sense (a lack of coherence), and feeling empty in the present (a lack of immediate experience).
People who lack direction let external coordinates decide their life path. They ask whether the money is good, whether it looks respectable, and what others will think. They study whatever is hot, do whatever makes money, and do what people of a certain age are supposed to do. Every step is "correct," but put together, it doesn't feel like their own life. You're walking a line someone else drew. It's steady, but you don't know why you're walking it.
People who lack coherence have lives that feel like scattered fragments. They've changed jobs a few times, studied a few things, been to a few places, but none of it connects. It's hard to tell it as a story, so it's hard to feel "who I am" from it. When someone asks, "What kind of person are you?" you can only list your job, your city, and your zodiac sign, like reading off a résumé.
People who lack immediate experience feel empty in the present. They can handle work, and life runs, but very few things absorb them. Time gets chopped up, attention gets consumed, and happiness becomes the brief numbness of scrolling on a phone. You lie around all weekend, and on Monday you're still tired.
Work may not provide these three things. But one thing can: interest.
In psychology, interest is not a vague "liking." It is a state of being continuously drawn to something, willing to actively invest attention and time in it, and finding satisfaction in the investment itself. Its satisfaction does not depend on external rewards. You play guitar not to pass a grading exam; you run not to post on social media; you repair old furniture not to sell it. You do the thing because while you're doing it, you're there.
Interest supplies all three gaps. It provides direction: it is one of the few coordinates that grows from the inside, requiring no justification and no self-persuasion. It provides coherence: people with a stable interest can tell their life as a story. Because I was curious about this, I learned that, and because of that, I went through these experiences. In meaning research, coherence is largely narrative ability, and interest is the narrative thread. It provides immersion: Csikszentmihalyi's flow research found that when challenge matches skill, goals are clear, and feedback is immediate, people enter a state of self-forgetfulness. The frequency of flow predicts happiness more directly than income or status.
Calling interest a "hobby" undersells it. It's a crucial part of the system that supplies meaning, especially when work can only provide a rice bowl.
4. Treating Work as a Tool Is Not Lying Flat. It's Drawing a Boundary.
Many people hear "treat work as a tool" and assume it means lying flat, slacking off, being irresponsible. It doesn't.
Treating work as a tool means acknowledging that it first has an economic function, and then, on that basis, trying to secure as much autonomy, competence, and relatedness as possible. If the work itself can't provide them, you supplement them outside work. This is drawing a boundary, not giving up. You can still do your job well, but you no longer demand that it carry the weight of your entire life's meaning.
You stop asking, "Can this job help me find my soul?" You start asking how much autonomy, competence, and relatedness it gives you, which one is most overdrawn, and whether it can support something outside work that actually supplies meaning.
But treating it as a tool has limits. If work chronically consumes all your energy and destroys the three needs, it's hard to make up for them outside work. If you get off work at eleven every night and just want to lie down on weekends, you won't have the energy to practice guitar, run, or meet friends. So more precisely: work can be a tool, but life's meaning has to be constructed by you. The materials for that construction are often autonomy, competence, relatedness, and the interests you're willing to keep investing in.
5. The Finland Example Can't Be Reduced to One Cause.
You mentioned Finland: high welfare, no worries about food or shelter, no fear even if unemployed, yet a seemingly incongruous high suicide rate. The example is worth thinking about, but be careful with single-cause explanations.
The relationship between high welfare and high suicide rates is complex. It involves history, alcohol, loneliness, climate, social comparison, mental health services, and many other factors. And Finland's suicide rate has generally declined in recent decades. It cannot simply prove that "having no material worries causes a meaning crisis." But it does remind us: welfare solves survival. It does not automatically solve connection and meaning. Not fearing hunger does not mean not fearing loneliness. Having a safety net does not mean having a reason to live.
This returns to the same conclusion: meaning is not an accessory to income, nor a benefit automatically issued by a system. It takes relationships, investment, narrative, and autonomy. And it takes a person slowly building a system of supply beyond survival.
6. Instead of Asking "What's the Meaning of My Work?" Ask Three Things.
If you're in the stage of "20K a month but life feels meaningless," you don't need to rush to quit, and you don't need to force yourself to immediately find a "soul job." Start with three concrete questions.
First, do an audit of what you need. Ask how much autonomy, competence, and relatedness the job gives you, which is most overdrawn, and whether the problem is a lack of decision-making space, years of work with no growth, or too much interpersonal friction. Locate the gap first, then decide whether to negotiate, adjust, or leave. Don't say vaguely "it's meaningless." Be specific: "Which need has been negative for too long?"
Second, build a meaning supply outside work. Find a stable interest, real relationships, physical activity, creative expression, or community participation. At least one of these should consistently give you the experience of "I'm willing to invest in this." Don't wait until work becomes a soul job before allowing yourself to feel alive. What work can't give you, you have to find yourself, and find it concretely. Not "I should cultivate a hobby," but "Wednesday at 7 p.m., I'm going to that woodworking class."
Third, practice telling your life as a story with a main thread. Not a success narrative, but a coherent one: what I was curious about, what I learned, what I went through, what I care about now. The thread doesn't have to be grand, but it can make you feel that these fragments aren't just scattered for nothing. You can start with one sentence: "This is the thing I've always cared about." Whatever you fill in is often a clue to meaning.
7. No Grand Finale. Just One Concrete Thing.
Friday, 10 p.m. The salary notification pops up again. This time you don't look at the number. You put the phone in your pocket, change your shoes, and go downstairs. The music shop at the entrance of the neighborhood is still lit. The owner is tuning a secondhand guitar. You asked about the price last week but didn't buy it. Today you walk in and say, "That Yamaha, let me try it."
You play for twenty minutes, stumbling, fingers hurting. The owner doesn't rush you. He sits nearby peeling an orange. Finally you say, "I'll take this one." On the way home with the guitar, you remember that next week you still have to revise the seventh version of that proposal, and the leader may still say to go back to the first version. But right now you have a guitar in your hands. The strings are new. Pressing them leaves marks.
When the alarm goes off tomorrow morning, you'll still have to go to work. But you know that when you come home at night, the guitar will be waiting in the corner.
About the Creator
Jin
Writer of reamstories
https://reamstories.com/jin
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also become a paid subscriber, letting them know you appreciate their work.
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.