FYI logo

The hole in the ozone layer

What happened to the hole in the ozone layer

By GazakPublished 9 months ago 3 min read
The hole in the ozone layer
Photo by Lightscape on Unsplash

within the Eighties, the arena faced a large problem:

there was a rapidly expanding hole inside the ozone layer.

So, what happened? And is it nevertheless there?

let’s pass back to the start.

The sun makes life in the world viable,

however an excessive amount of exposure to its UV radiation damages plant and animal DNA.

fortunately, about 98% of that radiation is absorbed via ozone molecules

dispersed within the stratosphere,

that are constantly damaged apart and reformed in this process,

maintaining a sensitive equilibrium.

but in the early Nineteen Seventies, two chemists— Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland—

established that extensively used chemicals known as chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs,

may want to disenchanted this balance.

CFCs have been developed within the Nineteen Twenties via 3 US-primarily based agencies

as coolants for fridges.

unlike current alternatives— inclusive of ammonia or methyl chloride—

CFCs had been non-flammable and non-poisonous—

which means they wouldn't burst into flames or cause deadly gasoline leaks.

they also made tremendous propellants, foaming marketers, and fireplace-retardants.

CFCs soon observed their way into a ramification of regular objects

and became a multi-billion greenback consistent with yr enterprise.

within the lower ecosystem, CFCs don’t smash down or react with different molecules.

but Molina and Rowland confirmed that within the stratosphere,

they are damaged apart by means of UV light, releasing chlorine atoms.

those then react with ozone,

destroying it faster than it may be replenished.

A single chlorine atom can spoil heaps of ozone molecules

earlier than eventually reacting with something else and forming a stable molecule.

Seeing the risk to their bottom line,

CFC producers pushed back to discredit the scientists,

even accusing them of operating for the KGB.

initial estimates showed that within 60 years,

CFCs ought to reduce ozone concentrations via 7%.

but through 1985, it became clear that ozone depletion, especially over Antarctica,

turned into occurring a good deal faster.

here, the extremely cold temperatures and particular structure of Antarctic clouds

accelerated ozone loss.

Scientists stationed in Antarctica observed a huge drop

in overhead ozone taking place every spring.

satellite information revealed the big quantity of those losses

and chemical tests confirmed that the motive become easily CFCs.

NASA quickly launched visualizations, which have been broadcast around the world

and captured public interest.

If ozone depletion endured, charges of skin cancer could skyrocket.

Photosynthesis could be impaired, making flora—

such as rice, wheat, and corn—

much less productive and extra at risk of disorder.

global agricultural production might plummet,

and complete ecosystems would crumble.

but many politicians— weighing immediately monetary concerns over lengthy-time period ones—

disagreed about what to do.

The fight to ban CFCs found not likely allies

in US President Ronald Reagan and united kingdom top Minister Margaret Thatcher.

regardless of their popular opposition to government regulation,

Reagan, who had passed through remedy for pores and skin cancer,

and Thatcher, who changed into educated as a chemist,

identified the need for immediate motion.

the united states and united kingdom, along with Canada, Norway, Sweden, and Finland,

led calls for an international ban on CFCs.

In 1987, representatives signed the Montreal Protocol,

requiring the speedy phasing out of CFCs

and creating a fund to help worldwide South international locations

in acquiring low priced, non-ozone depleting options.

It become later ratified by way of each us of a on this planet—

the handiest treaty in records to attain this.

In 1995, Molina, Rowland, and their Dutch colleague Paul Crutzen,

have been collectively awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

As the use of CFCs declined,

the ozone hole commenced shrinking,

and is anticipated to vanish absolutely by using 2070.

but we’re no longer out of the woods yet.

while the ban changed into a win for the climate, as CFCs are amazing greenhouse gases,

the alternatives that replaced them— hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs— are too.

at the same time as usually less powerful than CFCs,

HFCs still lure more heat than carbon dioxide

and are contributing to weather change.

To cope with this, in 2016, the Kigali amendment

turned into added to the Montreal Protocol,

calling for an 85% reduce in international HFCs with the aid of 2047.

This by myself should keep away from as much as 0.5°C of global warming by way of the stop of the century.

these days, as we are facing the existential danger of climate change,

the Montreal Protocol serves as a model for the decisive worldwide cooperation

we want to fight it.

The question is, what will it take for us to come collectively once more?


About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.