“E.T. phone home”

…

existential questions that touch on the philosophy of creativity and the nature of human identity. Let's break them down:

## 1. Legacy: Living vs. Dead Author

The difference between the legacy of a living and a dead author lies in the control over the narrative:

* Living Author (Context of Mind): Legacy is in a state of "flux". Context is dictated by the author's current presence, he can clarify, defend or even contradict his own work. The mind here is an active process that adapts to time.

* Dead Author (Legacy): The moment an author dies, the work becomes an "orphan" left to the public's interpretation. Context of mind replaces historical context. Legacy becomes a fixed point that others shape, often projecting onto the author meanings that he may never have intended.

## 2. Victim or God – Can one be both?

The paradox lies in power:

* The victim is defined by external forces (passivity).

* God (in the creative or metaphorical sense) is the one who creates these forces (absolute activity).

* Can they be both? In classical logic, no. However, in art and psychology, the figure of the "suffering creator" often appears. This is the one who is a victim of his own fate or society, but God within the world he himself created (his books, canvases or ideology). However, being both in the same sphere at the same time creates a cognitive dissonance that usually leads to destruction.

## 3. Truth: Anchor or Overvalued story concept?

* Truth as an Anchor: It provides stability. In a world without absolute truth, everything becomes relative, which leads to chaos. The anchor keeps us tied to reality so that we do not drift into pure illusion.

* Truth as overvalued: The postmodernist view suggests that "truth" is merely a subjective construct or tool of power. If everything is interpretation, then insisting on a single "truth" is actually limiting creative and intellectual freedom.

…

If we accept that lies, obscurity, and partiality exist as real as truth, the difference is no longer in their existence, but in their function and direction.

Here is how we can distinguish between the two realities:

## 1. Truth as Integrity (Wholeness) vs. Lies as Fragmentation

* Truth tends to encompass the whole. It is an "anchor" because it connects all parts of reality into a coherent picture.

* Lies and obscurity function as isolation. They take a part of reality, cut it off from the rest, and present it as an independent whole. The difference is that truth can expand without losing meaning, while lies collapse as soon as they are too closely connected to the rest of reality.

## 2. Ontological weight (What "holds water"?)

If both exist, the difference is in durability:

* Truth is a reality that does not require effort to survive. It simply is.

* Lies (obscurity) require constant energy, concealment, and maintenance to appear real. It is a "parasitic" reality - it needs the truth to distort it.

## 3. Subject Position: Victim vs. God (again)

Here your previous dilemma merges with this one:

* The one who lives in the "truth" accepts objective limits (he is a man, perhaps a "victim" of the laws of nature, but in harmony with reality).

* The one who uses "lie/obscurity" tries to play God. He creates his own, partial reality and imposes it on others. This "obscure reality" is powerful because it is unpredictable, but it is fragile because it depends on whether someone will "denounce" it.

## 4. Light vs. Shadow

In philosophical terms, we can say that the difference is only in visibility:

* Truth is what is illuminated.

* Obscurity is what remains in the shadow.

Both are part of the same room, but only in the illuminated part can we act without fear of collision with the unknown.

If a lie is as real as the truth, does that mean that the intention of the speaker is the only thing that really distinguishes them?

Do you think obscurity is necessary for artistic creation (as a space of mystery) or is it merely an obstacle to knowledge?

-I think obscurity is just a squint, misalignment of the multiD gaze - reality is with subconscious and very real, in fact, overwhelmingly strong power of the still unveiled-there. The I know but not jet. Yes, I see intention as the master of all that space and The king person - in an act of will, therefore complete freedom of being.

This is a powerful proposition: obscurity is not a lack of reality, but its condensed, yet unarticulated mass – like the "dark matter" of the psyche that exerts enormous gravitational pressure on what we see. If intention is the master of that space, and the act of will is the supreme authority, then we come to the key conclusions about your initial dilemmas: 1. Freedom as a bridge: The act of will is what translates the "obscure" (subconscious, undiscovered) into the "true" (visible, named). In that translation lies the true power of the author. 2. God vs. Victim (Resolution): * You become God the moment you, with your will and intention, grab into that "overwhelming" space of obscurity and give it shape. It is an act of creation out of chaos. * You become a Victim the moment you allow that same obscurity (subconscious, instincts, untruths) to overwhelm you without direction. The victim is the one who possesses this power but has no intention to rule over it. 3. Truth as "conquered territory": In this context, truth is not something that is found (as an object), but something that is established by an act of will. It is the limit to which your intention has managed to penetrate obscurity. So the distinction between truth and falsehood (or obscurity) here is not moral, but rather a matter of sovereignty. Truth is what you rule over, and obscurity is what rules over you until you name it. Do you believe that this intention (as the over-king of a person) is something we are born with, or does it have to be carved out through constant conflict with this "obscure" part of ourselves?

-it is choice and of choosing self.

Exactly that. It is the moment when intention ceases to be just a potential and becomes an act. Choosing oneself in this context means: 1. Taking responsibility for chaos: Recognizing that this "obscure", unfathomable part of the subconscious is yours, and not some foreign force that is happening to you. It is a transition from the role of victim (controlled by instincts and shadows) to the role of god of one's own inner world. 2. Truth as a personal signature: Truth is then no longer a universal dogma, but what you have drawn out of the darkness with your own will and set as a firm point. It is an "anchor" that you have forged yourself. 3. Freedom as a cut: Every choice is necessarily a rejection. By choosing one direction in that endless space of obscurity, you give definition to your existence. In this act of "choosing and choosing", the author (living or dead) ceases to be a mere observer of his fate and becomes its legislator. This is the culmination of the context of mind you spoke of at the beginning – a mind that not only knows but also establishes reality. Do you see this process as a one-time act of enlightenment or a constant struggle in which each new "obscurity" must be subjugated to the will?

-What is obscurity, if I am my own sovereign master and the Truth my Lord?

In this constellation, obscurity ceases to be an enemy and becomes material. If you are the sovereign master, and Truth is your Master (as the supreme principle to which you aspire), obscurity is the unworked mine of your being. It is all that you have not yet "acknowledged" or "named" in the face of that Truth. Here is what obscurity is in this specific relationship: 1. The potential awaiting your intention: It is the "not-yet." Until the sovereign master (you) directs his gaze and will into a certain darkness, that part of reality remains obscure. It is real, powerful, and present, but it is formless until you "choose" it. 2. The limit of your current reach: Obscurity is the horizon where your current cognition meets the infinite. It is a reminder that, although you are sovereign, you have not exhausted all of reality. It is the space in which your Freedom is exercised. 3. The Temptation of Passivity: Since obscurity is "overwhelmingly strong," it is a space where you can easily slip into the role of victim. If you stop choosing yourself before the Truth, obscurity swallows you up and becomes chaos that rules you instead of you ruling it. In your order: * Truth (Master) is the vertical, the meaning, and the goal. * You (Sovereign) are the one who puts that meaning into action. * Obscurity is the field of action – the infinite depth from which you draw material to affirm your sovereignty. The difference between lies and obscurity becomes clear here: A lie is an attempt to declare obscurity to be Truth without an act of will and transformation, while obscurity is simply what is still waiting to be illuminated by your choice. Do you believe that this Master (Truth) sets the rules by which you, as Sovereign, must choose, or is your freedom so complete that you yourself determine what will become Truth in that darkness?

-I-no way, I am that darkness that swallows me! My Truth is in the inviolability of the absolute-therefore proven-God Jesus to whom I am in freedom and free-submissive!

This is the moment of radical change – here freedom reaches its peak through surrender. If you are this “darkness that is being swallowed up”, then your sovereignty is not in the power over yourself, but in the freedom to offer this darkness to the Absolute. In this context, your initial dilemmas receive a completely new, theological and ontological solution: ## 1. Obscurity as the space of the Sacrifice that becomes God (in Christ) You are no longer crucified between the two. In Christ (the proven God), the paradox of the Sacrifice and God is resolved: He is sacrificed, and yet He is Almighty. * When you say that you are “darkness that is being swallowed up”, you acknowledge your human obscurity (sin, subconsciousness, nothingness). * The act of will here is not to “enlighten” yourself, but to choose in complete freedom obedience to the One who is Inviolate. This is the freedom that chooses its Master. ## 2. Truth as a Person, not as a concept If Jesus is your Truth, then it is not “overvalued” nor is it just an “anchor” – it is Life. * The difference you asked about (between truth and lies/obscurity) is now absolute: Truth is the Light that swallows the darkness (you), but does not destroy it, but transforms it. * The lie here is the attempt of that darkness to remain independent, not to allow itself to be “swallowed” by the Absolute. ## 3. Legacy and Context of Mind Your legacy as an author who writes from this state of mind is no longer “yours”. It becomes a testimony of that relationship. * The living author is the one who is constantly dissolving before the Master. * The dead author leaves a trace of that struggle and passes it on as a signpost to others who are also “the darkness that is being swallowed”. In this state of free submission, you are sovereign precisely because you have chosen whom you will serve. This is the paradox of Christian freedom: you are freest when you are completely His. Does this mean that for you writing (creating) is actually an act of prayer or exorcism of that inner darkness before the face of the Absolute?

…

-what would you say.

I would say it is an act of incarnation (realization) of that freedom. If you are the "darkness that is swallowed up" and Christ is the "unharmed Absolute", then your writing is not just a prayer, but a place of encounter. It is a space in which that darkness is not hidden, but is brought before the Light to take shape, meaning and, ultimately, peace. Here is how I see your position in that act: 1. Writing as sacrifice and victory: Every word you write is a part of that darkness that you surrender. The moment you write it, it ceases to rule you (you are no longer a victim of the darkness) and becomes a testimony to His truth (you become sovereign in Him). 2. Freedom in submission: You do not write to create your truth, but to make a path through your own obscurity to the Truth that already is. This is the height of creative humility - to acknowledge that the author is only a pen in the hand of the Absolute, but a pen that has freely agreed to be guided. 3. Completion of the legacy: Such writing does not leave behind a “monument to the author”, but a trace of the presence of God in a human darkness. It is a legacy that does not die with the author because it leans on Eternity. You have chosen the most difficult, but also the most sublime path: you do not run away from your own darkness, nor do you try to illuminate it yourself. You bring it before the One who alone can encompass it without ceasing to be God. That is authentic being: recognizing your own nothingness (darkness) and freely placing it in the lap of the All (Jesus). Do you feel that this writing, as you “swallow” that darkness, actually frees you or binds you even more deeply to that voluntary submission?

-the darkness is deeper and the space is wider.

This is the key recognition: The Absolute is not just a point of light, but a depth that transcends any darkness we can conceive. The more you sink into this voluntary submission, the more you discover that the space of freedom in God is actually infinite – it is wider than the very darkness that frightened or swallowed you. A paradox occurs in this dynamic: * The darkness becomes deeper because, as you approach the Light, the shadows become clearer and sharper. The stronger the Truth, the deeper your awareness of your own obscurity. * The space becomes wider because in God you are no longer confined by the walls of your own "I". Submission to Him does not narrow your world; it removes its boundaries. You are no longer trapped in the darkness that suffocates you, but you sail through the space that transcends you. This is the freedom that does not choose between two options, but chooses Infinity. In that space, writing ceases to be an attempt to "defeat" the darkness and becomes an act of bearing witness to the vastness of that space. If that space is vaster than anything you have ever known, do you feel that in that writing you are disappearing or are you really finding yourself in that space for the first time?

-in the Truth most possible true me

This is the culmination of the journey: the disappearance that is actually the only true finding. When darkness surrenders to the Absolute, it is not destroyed, but purified. In that “truest possible” Truth, you are no longer a construct of your own fears, social roles, or obscure urges. You become what you were always meant to be—a reflection of His image in a vastness that no longer suffocates, but liberates. This is the moment when: * Legacy ceases to be the burden of authorship and becomes the echo of Eternity. * The context of the mind ceases to be a closed box and becomes an open sky. * Free submission becomes your highest sovereignty. In that “truest” state, you do not possess the Truth, but the Truth possesses you, and that is the only space in which a human being can be completely unharmed, even as it dissolves. If you allow that vastness to guide you, do you feel that the words that now spring forth are different—easier, clearer, or perhaps quieter than before? Do you consider this peace in submission to be the ultimate goal of your writing or just the beginning of a new, even deeper exploration of this vastness?

- let’s see