Filthy logo

Sensual Art or Outright Pedophilia?

Balthus's obsession with cats and adolescent girls

By Kamna KirtiPublished 2 years ago 2 min read
2

The first time I encountered this painter's work, it reminded me of the classic and controversial novel- Lolita.

And then I came across that the painter's composition did make it to one of Lolita's book covers.

Balthus, born Balthasar Klossowski on 29 February 1908, developed an inclination for cats and art early.

In simple words: he had a long-standing obsession with cats and girls in puberty, whom he often featured nude, asleep, or in repose.

His earliest painting, The King of Cats, shows him posing stylishly towards the viewer. He is wearing high waist yellow trousers and an abbreviated necktie. A fluffy cat nudges his left calf, and a tile placed on the other side says: "A portrait of HM the King of Cats."

The King of Cats. Source - Public Domain

Another surrealist painting showcases a human-sized grinny cat devouring straight into his fresh fish and champagne. Doesn't the white bib on the cat look cute?

A shoal of fishes form a rainbow and refills the cat's plate one after another. A whole crab lies on a serving plate, and an adolescent girl waves from the boat.

The Mediterranean Cat (1949). Source - Public Domain

---

As Balthus progressed in his artistic career, he started creating eye-catching pictures of adolescent girls, in particular, Thérèse Blanchard, a 12–13-year-old girl who was Balthus's neighbor.

Girl and Cat(1937) show Blanchard gazing at us with her arms and hands crossed behind her head. She wears a mini skirt, and bobby socks, and her panty is exposed.

An obese cat looks at us too.

Girl and Cat (1937)

A year later, another version of Blanchard's series came out - Thérèse dreaming.

This painting shocked many. Two years ago, during Balthus's exclusive exhibition, a petition was filed against the Metropolitan Museum of Art stating:

"The artist of this painting, Balthus, had a noted infatuation with pubescent girls and this painting is undeniably romanticizing the sexualization of a child … Given the current climate around sexual assault and allegations that become more public each day, in showcasing this work for the masses, The Met is romanticizing voyeurism and the objectification of children."

Blanchard poses in a red mini skirt, bobby socks, and red ballet flats. Her eyes are closed, head turned, knee raised, and panty exposed.

Is she daydreaming? Or is she perhaps disconcerted by the viewer's gaze?

A white cat slurps milk beside Blanchard.

Thérèse dreaming (1938). Source - Public Domain

---

The Golden Days portray a 14-year-old model, Odile Bugnon, in a short skirt, her legs spread across a divan, and a shirtless man near the fireplace.

The Golden Days (1944)

---

The Guitar lesson (1934) became Balthus's most infamous artwork. It received a lot of wrath from the general public.

A bare-breasted woman strums the vulva of a schoolgirl with one hand and pulls her hair with another. The girl pulls the woman's nipples and the guitar on the floor.

---

Considering his times, Balthus unquestionably pursued a fragile and bold subject of adolescent psychology and vulnerability. Girls daydreaming, being lost in their vanity, or being completely self-absorbed show a few puberty traits.

Their unselfconscious postures sometimes suggest sensuality and sometimes inelegance, a contradiction that perfectly matched puberty's phase.

However, the artist's mindset and orientation towards making these subjects remain enigmatic.

Why was the Guitar Lesson made in the first place? What was Balthus's intent?

Was it artistic infatuation or outright romanticism of pedophilia as viewed by the audiences? Although he and his keepers denied these allegations.

Balthus confessed late in life that few of his subjects, especially Guitar Lesson, might have crossed the line of decency.

---

Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

---

Here are my art musings on my YouTube Channel Frame of Reference.

art
2

About the Creator

Kamna Kirti

Art enthusiast. I engage with art at a deep level. I also share insights about entrepreneurship, founders & nascent technologies.

https://linktr.ee/kamnakirti

Reader insights

Nice work

Very well written. Keep up the good work!

Top insight

  1. Eye opening

    Niche topic & fresh perspectives

Add your insights

Comments (2)

Sign in to comment
  • The Food Guy2 years ago

    It's really strange and fascinating to see anyone making this borderline inappropriate art and yet it almost begs the question - shouldn't this art exist too? I feel that it should but the way to see it should be covered in context otherwise it is porn. Right?

  • David Parham2 years ago

    The hardest job in the art world is that of the art writer. Those who attempt to explain what an artist has created. When I look at the work of Balthus I have to wonder how much grooming took place in order to get Thérèse Blanchard and Odile Bugnon, to agree to such provocative poses. And did their parents agree to let them pose? Were they paid? The Guitar lesson is, in my opinion, straight up kitty porn. It's tempered by the fact that the teacher is a female with her breast exposed one might think this is consensual. I don't think it is. It would be quite a different story if the teacher had been a man. The young girl looks like she's being assaulted and neither the teacher or the student looks to be enjoying this sexual encounter. But the teacher is clearly in control while the student submits. Notice the limp hand next to the guitar; and where the student's hair is being pulled it looks like an attempt by the teacher to keep the girl from falling off her lap. I think Balthus was fascinated by the female shape of the guitar itself. The hole in the middle emits sound. Depending on how it's played the sounds can be violent or sensual, comforting, even loving. Those sounds are what the teacher is searching for by strumming the Vulva. the fact that the guitar is casually discarded on the floor, to me, is a sign this young girl will be discarded as well like a worthless instrument. Or an artist's model. I think you've done a great job. I'll be reading the rest of your articles. Thanks.daveparha8@instagram

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.