Research Experiment on Nudity at University: Part 4

The receptionist came to me happily and told me that the Professor had arrived. She must be happy because she could go home soon after the Professor arrived. My heartbeat increased and I returned to the standing position having my legs apart 1 foot and moved even closer to the door to increase the visibility of my naked body. This excitement made my penis become erect.

The professor came, saw me waiting nude, and called me behind her to follow to her office. She did not seem excited by my nakedness and did not even smile at me. She opened her office door and went in, I too followed. The first thing she asked me was whether I was circumcised. When I said no, she told me to pull my foreskin back and told me that nakedness did not include foreskin retraction. Then she directed me to a chair and asked me to sit down. I became embarrassed since I myself did not want to retract my foreskin and planned to make the Professor convinced that foreskin retraction is not part of nudity. I did not want to tell these to her and I thought I would definitely have chance to proof my deep understanding on nudity. In the meantime the Professor went out and had a short chat with the receptionist, might be to release her from her duty.

After she came back she sat at her chair across the table and started her discussion. One thing I noticed was, unlike the receptionist or other researchers I met earlier she did not bother to stare at my nudity that showed me how mature she was in nudity. In fact, by the time the Professor sat down at her desk my penis returned to normal flaccid mode. I was expecting her to ask many interview questions, but it was actually her talking to me in such a way that I was already selected and I was described my responsibilities as a nude subject.

The first question she asked me was whether I am aware of the change of the advertisement and I got confused whether the advertisement I viewed was the more recent version or the older one. Sensing my confusion she told me that the only difference between the advertisements was that according to the new advertisement I would be paid $50000 and not $15000. Then she asked me whether that payment was enough for me. I could not believe my ears. $50000, I could not even conceive the amount. She briefly told that change of amount was after a serious discussion between her daughter and her research team. She did not tell any details of the discussion but told me that I would be meeting her for dinner as she invited me. She told that she would be picking up me for the dinner and then she moved on to other items. The research team I mentioned here was not the researchers I met earlier but few professors and research fellows from two other Universities with whom this Professor was collaborating. Among many terms she discussed, two items that had slight different from that of the advertisement are the followings. One was that I had to stay in an apartment provided by the research team within the campus and that same apartment would be shared by any members of the research team. The second term was that I should always sleep naked, on my back, in a well lit room and that would be continuously videoed. This is not a term but a request to me that I could reject if I did not like that. But she told if I accept the second term and if I could sleep most of the nights on my back then the payment would be increased by another $10000. She told this video recording was not for their research on nudity but for some other research on studying about the behaviour of the penis in night during sleep including the morning erection. My only concern was I might not be able to sleep if lights were on. She told that they would provide me with good sleeping eye mask and would do their maximum to facilitate good sleep for me. So I agreed to that term as well. That's it for the much awaited interview for me and then we planned to leave for the dinner with her daughter.