My Cock Spurts Dirty Words

Google, Yahoo, Bing and DuckDuckGo have algorithms to keep all the little children from seeing bad, bad, dirty, dirty words. The Economist, The New York Times and The Atlantic, reputable print and internet media remove splooge and jizz from their articles and editorial comments. As if anyone, or any idea, is made less by using slang instead of the acceptable, authorized hospital term: semen. Cum by any other name doth smell as salty. Perhaps you are a novelist, with ten thousand online followers, and your new short story includes bad, bad algorithm-censored words. Your story will not come appear in a Google search, or your online blog may be altered with nonsense words, to replace any bad, bad, dirty things the algorithms thinks you wrote. I slurp your cum- is unacceptable. You might get away with- I drink your semen. Google: Scunthorpe problem

I have notice this specifically with my articles on vocal.media. During the first month, a “Roscoe Forthright” search in Yahoo would list all my vocal.media articles. Then I turned into a potty-mouth, and the algorithms turned against me! The word-filters say I am offending someone's tender , virginal sensibilities. The visual filters are a different story, and usually can be turned on and off by the user. I notice all my very x-rated cumshot, cock-sucking, pussy-licking videos are available to watch by searching Google, Yahoo and the rest. I do notice: Only the RedTube videos show up in the searches, that is, only the free videos show up. I wonder who wrote that algorithm? As if me and my beautiful naked girls making a dollar or two from porn is ethically, socially, economically or morally impure. As if the creators of algorithms know what is best for our civilization, and only want to list what is FREE. Cheap bastards.

Who makes up these rules? In 2005, S.1507 Internet Safety and Child Protection Act was passed by our brilliant U.S. Senators, and then began the word-filter obsession. All the innocent, sweet, little children may not see the written word “cunt”-- though they can hear the word in the routines of many stand-up comics and in many old rap songs. However, the main push for word censorship comes from the big advertisers, on whom the search engines rely for billions of dollars of ad revenue. Volvo, Pfizer, McDonalds, Walmart and Subaru do not want their expense ads placed next to creative articles, perhaps concerning a sweaty, hairy non-white twat, spilling out five of the six loads of sticky Asian jizz, which muscular, handsome boys just shot inside her. If I ran a car company, I would not want my expensive family-friendly ads next to this sort of creative fiction. The Google solution is: Eliminate the creative fiction. As if grown-ups are no longer allowed to think or communicate dirty ideas to each other in any public forum. And, since the only public forum left is the internet--- We simply need to censor ourselves, or the prissy, prim algorithms will do it for us.

Clearly, I am a trouble-maker. I must be quarantined, censored and removed from public discourse. My creative short porn videos will probably go on forever. Long after I am dead, some young men will jack-off while watching Roscoe Forthright videos, in whatever media-types are available in 2080. My ideas, my written words will disappear from human history, deleted, edited, censored into oblivion, by current search engines, designed to respond to current advertising necessities. Do I care? Not really. I am not certain I have anything truly important to say. I simply wish advertising concerns, the making of big money, did not pretend to be “doing it for the innocent, sweet little children, to protect the little children.” Censorship is for the purpose of maximizing cash flow, and has nothing to do with the little children.