Education logo

The Intricacies of Learning from Failure

Unveiling Insights from a 2019 Rune Study

By Shelby AndersonPublished 6 months ago 3 min read
The Intricacies of Learning from Failure
Photo by lilartsy on Unsplash

In a comprehensive study conducted in 2019, a diverse group of over 400 participants willingly engaged in a unique and captivating experiment involving the acquisition of proficiency in a newly devised and enigmatic language. The linguistic challenge presented to these individuals involved deciphering three distinct pairs of runes, with inquiries ranging from identifying representations of living beings to discerning symbols indicative of inanimate objects.

Following a brief intermission, the participants faced a clever twist: the same rune pairs were reintroduced, but this time, the questions were strategically reversed. In essence, the participants were tasked with identifying runes that signified non-living entities. Unbeknownst to the participants, a clandestine mechanism governed the evolution of the game. The responses provided during the initial round played a pivotal role in shaping the meanings ascribed to the runes in the subsequent round.

In the inaugural phase, participants experienced one of two predetermined scenarios: either all their responses were unequivocally deemed correct, regardless of accuracy, or they were compelled to grapple with failure by having every question marked as incorrect. Consequently, at the intermission, all participants found themselves on equal footing in terms of acquired information, setting the stage for a genuine competition in the second round. Despite the ostensibly level playing field, those who triumphed in the initial round ascended to the upper echelons of success, while those categorized as failures continued to encounter setbacks.

Commonly, failure is characterized as a valuable lesson—a requisite stumble on the path to improvement. However, the assimilation of knowledge from our mistakes is not always straightforward, particularly when faced with demoralization, overwhelming challenges, or perplexing circumstances. The question then arises: What impedes us from transforming our failures into opportunities for mastery?

Arguably, the most palpable barrier to deriving lessons from failure lies in its inherent discomfort. People inherently desire to perceive themselves as capable and competent, and the experience of failure poses a direct threat to this self-image. In a post-study survey, participants who fell into the failure category reported significantly lower levels of self-confidence, underscoring the emotional toll of setbacks. While it may be tempting to view this pain as a transient setback, studies suggest that significant threats to self-esteem can hinder the brain's capacity to assimilate new information, potentially impeding the learning process.

However, the tolerance for failure is not solely determined by the painful emotional response; it is also influenced by one's relationship with the task at hand. A 2011 study, focusing on American students enrolled in introductory and advanced French courses, unveiled interesting insights. Beginner students tended to seek positive reinforcement, gravitating towards teachers who emphasized their strengths and successes. In contrast, advanced students displayed a greater inclination for critical feedback, valuing corrections of their weaknesses. This disparity in preferences was attributed to the different stages of the learning journey; beginners, in the nascent phase of language acquisition, sought motivation through praise, while advanced learners, already deeply invested, prioritized efficiency in skill enhancement.

Whether one is an expert or a novice, the process of learning from successes is often more straightforward than extracting insights from failures. Consider the scenario of receiving exam grades: success allows for a reasonable assumption that effective choices were made in terms of timing, content, and study intensity. On the contrary, failure introduces a myriad of uncertainties—perhaps insufficient study time, the focus on incorrect information, or unforeseen test content. The ambiguity surrounding the cause of failure makes it challenging to discern a clear path for improvement.

While the natural inclination is to learn from failures, cultivating resilience and adopting a growth mindset, it is essential to avoid fixating solely on setbacks. Acknowledging and building upon successes can be a more effective strategy than dwelling on mistakes. By accentuating what is working well, individuals can pave the way for continuous improvement and sustained success.

how to

About the Creator

Shelby Anderson

I like writing about many things

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Shirley Belk6 months ago

    Yes! Start with milk and then advance to meat. In nursing, it is well known that the more seasoned nurses often "eat their young." It is terrible and whole studies should be done on that. Nursing schools often have levels in clinicals done at the hospitals. I think a smart Dean would place the kinder, gentler instructors with the babies and then put the battle axes with the students about to graduate.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.